ipl-logo

1960s Dbq Essay

724 Words3 Pages

From 1954 - 1968 the United States faced an essential event in its history called the African-American civil rights movement which occured to have equal rights for the african americans. When these events occurred there were leaders chosen for the african americans. A voice that spoke out in favor for them, and not only was there one but there was two. There names were Martin Luther King Jr (MLK) and Malcolm X. Though there was two, Martin Luther King Jr’s philosophy made the most sense for america during the 1960s because of their views on three topics. Violence, integration and the economy. Both leaders had there own personal views on violence but Martin Luther King Jr’s had the most peaceful and logical views to be used. Malcolm X views of violence were a bit more aggressive. Malcolm X was not in favor of violence but he said that non-violence should not be taught only to the black. Malcolm said that he didn't see anyone teaching the Ku Klux Klan about stopping …show more content…

Malcolm X’s philosophy on economy was that the blacks should learn more on financing and that they should have their own economy separate from the whites. Malcolm talked about starting a business in our own community, knowing how to spend out money and make a living also not protesting against whites and influencing boycotts (Doc 7). MLK was the opposite of Malcolms. He wanted to boycott he wanted everyone to have one economic system and he wanted to protest. MLK said that if the people refused to cooperate in the with the government and refusing to buy from stores that refuse to hire blacks, then there profit is taken away, forcing them to increase salaries of the blacks and there need of workers. MLK’s views on the economy was better. When his teachings were applied to all the blacks lives the outcome was just as he said. Income salaries were increased and store owners need to hire the blacks helping them in their

Show More
Related

  • Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Dbq

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    During, the fight for civil rights in the late 1950s and 1960s two men stood up to lead the black community to fight for their rights and their equality. In the 1960’s it was a hard time for black Americans to consider themselves as equals due to the laws in the United States of America. The Civil War had stopped slavery but hadn’t stopped discrimination towards blacks. To help their fellow African Americans, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. both wanted to find a way that could and a way that should help all African Americans receive equality in a world where they weren’t wanted.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Nonviolent Tactics Of MLK And Malcolm X

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    I personally think MLK’s philosophy made more sense in the 1960s. My reasons for this is his nonviolent tactics, you can't fight fire with fire, and his determination. One of my reasons that MLK’s philosophy was better was his nonviolent tactics. He did things like marches, boycotts, speeches, and sit-ins, which were smart and effective in the 1960s. In document F it says,”There is nothing quite so effective as a refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and institutions which perpetrate evil in our communities.”

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Was The Best For America Dbq Essay

    441 Words  | 2 Pages

    The number one reason why I think Malcolm X’s philosophy made the most sense for America in the 1960’s is because he is a realist. He knows what it takes to make things great. So this means that he sees things the way they are in the world. In document K it states that Malcolm X does not favor violence but condemns it when necessary.

    Read More

  • What Is Malcolm X's Philosophy In No Crystal Staiir

    805 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the book “No Crystal Stair”, many people were motivated by Malcolm X’s philosophy “by any means necessary” more than Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy. The way I see the Civil Rights Movement, society moves forward farther using violence. A nonviolent approach was not a good as a violent approach because violence was the key to the Civil Rights Movement. Also, Lewis Michaux, the main character, supports Malcolm X’s philosophy a little more than Martin Luther King Jr’s. Reasons being that it made the black community more brave, made them grow and fight for what they believe in, and nonviolence lead to death.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcom X

    1298 Words  | 6 Pages

    Ololade Latinwo In the 1960s, the idea of equal rights for African Americans citizens began to take hold in the United States At the head of this major movement were two major leaders: Martin Luther King Jr. Despite the fact that they had the common goal of racial equality, they had opposing views on how to obtain it. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that Civil Rights should be obtained peacefully, through methods such as boycotts, sit-ins, and marches. While Malcom X believed that such a thing should be obtained at all costs, with violence or otherwise.

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Movement: Similarities Between MLK And Malcolm X

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    Malcolm X felt that black Americans needed to secure their rights “by any means necessary”. A lot of terrible things happened to him which is why he was that way, like his house getting burned down, being under threat by the KKK, his fathers death, and his mother having a nervous breakdown, which led him into a foster home. Ultimately, both of them changed how many individuals viewed the world and the Civil Rights Movement. MLK Jr. was a peaceful activist who decided to resolve things with more tranquility. Many things influenced him to be this way.

    Read More

  • Mlk's Approach To Violence

    411 Words  | 2 Pages

    MLK’s approach to civil rights acts was non-violent , passive resistance, and “ weapons of love”. I feel like MLK is more successful for the civil rights movement, he was more of a peaceful leader. He was more careful at handling stuff, like weapons, and non-violence. Both of them are against violence. That's why they had

    Read More

  • 1960s Dbq Essay

    1117 Words  | 5 Pages

    Malcolm X on the other hand was trying to strengthen the African American economies, and was less focused on getting the support of whites as well as blacks. Because of this, his philosophy wasn’t as good as Martin Luther

    Read More

  • 1960s Dbq Essay

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the late 1950s and 1960s the southern states in America were segregated. Black and white people were separated from bathrooms to schools and therefore, blacks had to use their installments or they would be punished by whites. While this was happening, two African American men, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, wanted segregation to come to an end. So they proclaimed their ideas and started to form groups to protest against segregation in America. Consequently, Martin Luther King Jr’s civil rights philosophy made the most sense during the 1960s because integrated schools was the goal, nonviolence could have a huge impact on the enemy and nonviolence was the only practical strategy.

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Dbq Essay

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil rights philosophy made more sense for the 1960’s. During the 1960’s the civil rights movement proved prominent. Through the 60’s thousands of leaders rose, but only two emerged above the rest. Those two were known as Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both Martin and Malcom were very intelligent men but the two had totally different views on how blacks should go about gaining civil rights. Both proved to be pioneers of the movement, however it was Martins philosophy that reigned supreme.

    Read More

  • 1960s Dbq Essay

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the 1960’s, the Civil Rights Movement was a big topic and controversy with all of the United States. It was quite clear that African Americans did not get treated the same way that whites did. It had been ruled that it was constitutional to be “separate but equal”, but African Americans always had less than the whites did. For example, the schools that they had were run down, and had very little classrooms, books, and buses. Martin Luther King had a large role in the Civil Rights Movement, as did Malcolm X, and others.

    Read More

  • 1960s Dbq Essay

    811 Words  | 4 Pages

    From the late 1950s to the late 1960s civil for blacks in remained a burning topic in media and everyday life. Two of the most influential to the movement were Martin Luther King Jr., a preacher from Atlanta, and Malcolm X, an ex-convict from Lansing, Michigan. King, during this era, was most well-known for quite literally preaching for non-violent civil disobedience to create social change. Conversely, X vouched for a violent revolution, a sort of fight fire with fire for the time. For the 1960s however, the ideals of king would be much more advantageous to the cause of the African Americans; in that they had little to no respect towards them from whites and violence would only cause more disrespect, the violent protests would also end

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Dbq Analysis

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    It took the military to allow nine African Americans students to enter a school in a white neighborhood. This is only one event, other events created riots, bombings, discrimination, poverty, and racism. This is why Malcolm X’s philosophy is much better for the sake of time and our nation. Malcolm X

    Read More

  • Philosophical Differences Between Martin Luther King And Malcolm X

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

    1974 Words  | 8 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. was the leader of peaceful protests and nonviolence for the segregation among blacks and whites while Malcolm X wanted to gain justice through any possible way even if it required violence. The Montgomery Bus Boycott made King a more prominent leader

    Read More

More about 1960s Dbq Essay

Open Document