Marwah Alabbad Post lab 10/21/15 Question 1: 1. Experiment 1: Number of trails NaOH concentration (M) Volume of HCl solution (mL) Initial volume of NaOH(mL) final volume of NaOH(mL) The volume of NaOH to titrate HCl (mL) Concentration of HCl (M) 1st 0.1023 25.0 10.05 36.12 26.07 0.085 2nd 0.1023 25.0 5.74 31.40 25.66 0.105 3rd 0.1023 25.0 9.84 35.52 25.68 0.105 First trail calculation: 0.02607L× (0.1023mole NaOH/1L)×(1 mol of HCL/1 mol of NaOH)×(1/0.025)= 0.085M of HCl The average HCl concentration of the three trails is = 0.098 M 2. Question 2: Experiment 2: The acidity and vinegar, the type of vinegar we used was Kroger distilled white vinegar, and the acidity of the vinegar was 5% Trails Dilution of original vinegar solution. Volume of …show more content…
To find the mass percent of acetic acid in vinegar, the molar mass of acetic acid is 60.05 g/mole, and 1.00 g/mol of density, then 0.96 mol×(60.05 g/1 mol) = 57.65 g 57.65 g/1000= 0.0576 ×100 = 5.76% The average mass % of acetic acid in vinegar = 5.53% The average % of acetic acid was 5.53%, which is close to the acidity of the vinegar that was taken in the lab which was 5%, for the different percent we had it could be because of errors in calculations or errors in collecting data. 3. Question3: Experiment 3 The unknown acid sample was 1 • Monoprotic Acid Trails Initial NaOH solution (mL) final NaOH solution (mL) The volume of NaOH to titrate the acid (mL) Amount of Unknown Acid sample 1 (g) The moles of the Unknown Acid (mol) Molar mass of the Unknown Acid (g/mol) A 3.38 28.31 24.93 0.150 0.0026 57.69 B 0.18 29.32 29.14 0.175 0.0029 …show more content…
Question 4: List the 3 errors; • Adding too many drops of NaOH at the same time would affect the results because we can’t determine the exact equivalent point when the color changed. The results won’t be accurate and that will affect all the data that are dependent on the amount of NaOH to titrate. • Other error could be the hardness to notice a color change; we always use a white paper under the flask to determine when the color changes right away. And if we don’t use the white paper it will be hard to determine the color change and the amount of NaOH that was used to titrate it. • Also other source of error could be by not rising the burette with NaOH before we fill up with it, or it maybe they were rinsing it with a lot of NaOH which could affect the data recording for NaOH amount of titration. 5. Question 5: a) As mentioned in the manual, we have the ratio (K/H+ ), if H+ was lower than K then the equivalent point will be achieved and it will change color. And if H+ was more than K then the solution we are titrating will be the same, the equivalent point won’t be achieved, and it will be acidic solution. And to find the value of H+ is by having the value of pH, therefore the pH has changed from 7 to 9, which is by shifting from 10-7 to 10 -8 by adding the 0.01 of the base, and it will shift again from 10 -8 to 10 -9 by adding another 0.01 of the base to the solution , the different that’s added between the two shifting are close to each other which indicates that the
Prelab week 1 Calculations Preparation of 1.5μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=1.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(1.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.1ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.1ml×1000)μL= 100μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=3μmol/L × 10ml V1=(3μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.2ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.2ml×1000)μL= 200μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=7.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(7.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.5ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.5ml×1000)μL= 500μL Preparation of the blank samples The volumetric flask will be filled to the mark with 150μmole/L of stock solution to act as blank (reference). Additional two blanks will
In the first part of the experiment, Part A, the standard solutions were prepared. As a whole, the experiment was conducted by four people, however, for Part A, the group was split in two to prepare the two different solutions. Calibrations curves were created for the standard solutions of both Red 40 and Blue 1. Each solution was treated with a serial 2-fold dilution to gain different concentrations of each solution.
Conclusion: Compare Trial 1 and Trial 2. The Trial 1 change in mass are 12.5g, however Trial 2 changes in mass is 1.2g. The Trial 1 change in mass is more than Trial 2. And I think the Low of Conservation of Mass violated in the Trial 1 is can be exist. Because the Trial 1 actually the soda with vinegar have Chemical reactions occur and chemical
3. Upon adding 20 drops of NaOH, a white precipitate was formed signifying acidic impurity. In the second NaOH mixture, about 20 drops were administered and no precipitate formed indicating that the ample is more pure than before. Data: Weight of flask = 75.10 grams Weight of the flask with solids =
Conclusion: Based on the results of molarity from Trials 1, 2, and 3, it is concluded that our experimental for each trial is .410M NaOH, .410M NaOH, and .450M NaOH. The actual molarity of the NaOH concentration used was found to be 1.5M NaOH. The percent error of the results resulted in 72%. The large error may have occurred due to over titration of the NaOH, as the color of the solution in the flask was a darker pink in comparison for the needed faint pink. Discussion of Theory:
The percent recovery of the acid was 42%, but there was originally 40% of o-toluic acid in the mixture. The extra 2% could have been the impurity, 1, 4-dibromobenzene, which was isolated in the next part of the experiment. There is also another possible reason on why more acid was recovered. The acid wasn’t dried completely before it was weighed; the clumpy solids of the acid prove that it was still wet and thus, the extra liquid added to its mass. This could have been prevented by allowing the acid to dry longer or by drying it in an oven.
Stoichiometry is a method used in chemistry that involves using relationships between reactants and products in a chemical reaction, to determine a desired quantitative data. The purpose of the lab was to devise a method to determine the percent composition of NaHCO3 in an unknown mixture of compounds NaHCO3 and Na2CO. Heating the mixture of these two compounds will cause a decomposition reaction. Solid NaHCO3 chemically decomposes into gaseous carbon dioxide and water, via the following reaction: 2NaHCO3(s) Na2CO3(s) + H2O(g) + CO2(g). The decomposition reaction was performed in a crucible and heated with a Bunsen burner.
11) After you have prepared the dilutions, clean the outsides of the cuvettes with a paper towel. 12) Place the blank tube (tube 0) in the spectrophotometer. Since distilled water has no color it will not absorb any light so the absorbance number would be zero and this done to test the absorbance scale on the Spectrophotometer for the purpose of having it calibrated correctly. 13) Set the spectrometer to a wavelength of 530 nanometers. 14) Place the cuvettes (numbers 1-6) with the appropriate substance and record it’s reading in the data table.
(0.01 moles of NaOH) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 2 moles of NaOH) = 0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2 Tube 1: (0.0020 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.002 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.002 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.1 grams = theoretical yield Tube 2: (0.0035 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.004 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.004 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.3 grams= theoretical yield Tube 3 (0.0050 moles of CaCl2) x (1 mole Ca(OH)2/ 1 mole of CaCl2) = 0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2 (0.005 moles of Ca(OH)2) x (74.08 grams/mole) = 0.4 grams =theoretical yield Tube
2.The color differs with depth or length of the solution because when we are to use the flashlight above the test tubes the color may seem to be darker or more concentrated and if we are to light it from the
Ali Atwi : Internal assesment – calculating of the concentration of ethanoic acid in vinegar AIM : To calculate the concentration of ethanoic acid CH3COOH in vinegar using stoichiometric equations, ( Yamaha brand ) Introduction : I personally like to add a little bit of vinegar on my food because it makes it taste better, yet I know that vinegar contains acid, and I also know the consequences of highly concentrated acid intake, like severe itching and stomach ache, vomiting. Venigar contains a small percentage of ethanoic acid Ch3COOH. This practical aims to find out the concentration of the of the vinegar against a standard solution of sodium hydroxide soloution of concentration 0.1 mol dm3 through acid-base titration, the label on the bottle says 6%.
IV. Data and observations Mass of beaker (g) 174.01 Mass of beaker + NaOH pellets (g) 174.54 Mass of NaOH pellets 0.53 TRIAL 1 TRIAL 2 Mass of potassium acid phtalate (KHP) (g) 0.15 0.15 final buret reading (ml) 30.75
In direct titrations, the number of moles of acid can be easily derived by simply manipulating with the values of acid and base given in the experiment. In back titration, excessive volumes of acid are always added. Of which, only a certain quantity would be neutralised. The number of moles of acid is eventually derived from titrating this excess acid with a strong base and using mole fractions to calculate. The quantity of acid neutralised is obtained by subtracting the moles of acid given at the start of the experiment, with the moles of acid titrated.
The chemical equation for this experiment is hydrochloric acid + sodium thiosulphate + deionised water (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in 5ml intervals) sodium chloride + deionised water (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in 5ml intervals) + sulphur dioxide + sulphur. As a scientific equation, this would be written out as, NA2S2O3 + 2HCL + H2O (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in
That caused a new initial reading of NaOH on the burette (see Table1 & 2). The drops were caused because the burette was not tightened enough at the bottom to avoid it from being hard to release the basic solution for titrating the acid. The volume of the acid used for each titration was 25ml. The volume of the solution was then calculated by subtracting the initial volume from the final volume. We then calculated the average volume at each temperature.