The Constitution of the United States is the concrete platform that the nation is built upon which contains fundamental principles in which our nation is governed by. However, much of the Constitution is very ambiguous which leads to controversy in the court room. For example, the Eighth Amendment which states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (Baltzell). The first part of the Eighth Amendment protects accused citizens of the United States from unreasonable and extreme amounts of bail that would prevent them from being released from pretrial containment and it also limits the amount of a fine that can be given to a convicted person (8th Amendment)(Kurt). The …show more content…
It all began with a guy named Titus Oates who claimed that the Catholics were plotting to kill King Charles II. This lead to the death of a multitude of Catholics. Later they figured out that he was lying the whole time in in order to try to get his father to have the thrown (8th Amendment). Oates was then convicted of perjury and sentenced to a life of imprisonment. Only three days out of each year was he allowed out of his cell, two days to be placed in the stocks and one day to be whipped (8th Amendment). A few short years later, Parliament created the Bill of Rights which prohibited “cruel and unusual punishment” (Stevenson). They descried Titus Oates punishment “as exorbitant, extravagant, barbarous, and inhuman,” therefore becoming the central key reason why the Eighth Amendment was created to put a stop to any more harsh chastisements similar to his (8th Amendment). It was placed into the English Bill of Rights which stated, “That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted,” which later was almost taken word for word and placed into the U.S. Bill of Rights (Levy). The U.S. Constitution reads today, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” for the Eighth Amendment (Baltzell). Then exactly a century later, in 1789, the Constitution was on its way towards ratification …show more content…
But are we in the future to be prevented from inflicting these punishments because they are cruel? If a more lenient mode of correcting vice and deterring others from the commission of it would be invented, it would be very prudent in the Legislature to adopt it; but until we have some security that this will be done, we ought not to be restrained from making necessary laws by any declaration of this kind’ “ (Bomboy). In other words, Livermore was arguing that all citizens who commit horrible crime do deserve severe punishments for the crimes that they commit, and until the government figures out a way to place restrictions and guidelines on the penalties that we believe are morally proper to give, then they cannot hold back from reprimanding those citizens. Consequently, The Founding Fathers created the Eighth Amendment to be intended for further generations to interpret the meaning of “cruel” and “unusual” over time (Donnell). The amendment was then ratified in 1791 nevertheless, the Eighth Amendment and the death penalty is still highly debated today because the differences in interpretations
They wanted to gain inspiration from other countries so they looked at a document called the Magna Carta from England. In the document it says, “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or
The Constitution of the United States, comprised of seven articles and twenty-seven amendments, exists to establish a three branch government, to divide power between the federal government and the states, and to give citizens of the United States individual liberties. This document has lasted over two hundred years because of its flexibility and the way in it effectively spreads out power amongst the branches in the federal government and the state governments. The Constitution of the United States has changed the way that myself and millions of other Americans experience life; it has made the United States one of the most successful nations in the history of the world. The second article of The Constitution of the United States has greatly
Upon reading the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8 stood out for me. The reason being is that it was not contained in the Articles of Confederation. In Section 8, it says that Congress will have the power to impose and collect taxes. This was a step from the Articles of Confederation that they once followed. This was one of the many problems that they had.
The most important issue that must be addressed in this case is the principle of the “evolving standards of decency” and the uses of a national consensus. The “evolving standards of decency” were developed by Trop v. Dulles and have been implemented in one way or another in all of the precedents dealing with “cruel and unusual” punishment. It is important to treat these principles as an important aspect of “cruel and unusual” punishment jurisprudence, therefore turning from these set of principles would be foolish and a disregard for every precedent. However, it is important to acknowledge that each case satisfies the standards by using a different method; some use the presence or lack of state legislature as a judgment of consensus while others look at foreign countries.
The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, stating “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Although the Eighth Amendment is typically used in relation to the discussion of the death penalty or the evaluation of a long prison sentence for a nonviolent crime, in 2011 the Supreme Court used the cruel and unusual punishment portion of the amendment to assess Brown v. Plata, a case which determined whether or not the Eighth Amendment protection is violated if prisoners are deprived of basic sustenance. In the case of Brown v. Plata, 46,000 prisoners were to be released from a federal correction facility as a result of unprecedented overcrowding within a
The U.S. Constitution is what the Supreme Court uses to make the decision for a court case, it is like an instruction manual for the U.S., and it contains the rights of all
The Eighth Amendment was created to prohibit cruel punishments that the colonists would receive from the British. The British brought colonists over to an unfair trial and then received punishment that sometimes would be death. The writers of the wanted to make sure that the colonists received the fair trial and fair punishment they deserve. The Eight Amendment was ratified in December 5, 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights. The Eighth Amendment has not been changed since the ratification in 1791.
A principle called habeas corpus came under the English Bill of Rights as well. Habeas corpus abolished excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment. Also by that principle, no person could be held in prison without first being charged with a specific crime. This let the nobles live in peace because they could not be unlawfully arrested
Being a US citizen has its perks, but knowing the amendments to the Constitution is something every citizen should consider, especially the first. Freedom of speech is one of the most important. If people want to share their opinions on how the government is doing, they are able to do so without the fear of getting in trouble with the law. It’s also a way to defend one’s self from courts but in an unharmful way. Freedom of religion is another right to the amendment that is also very important.
There was a recent storm in Hollywood, Florida that left many homes without power. This storm also affected prisoners that were still kept in prisons that lacked of power, supplies, and plumbing during the emergency. This situation relates to The Eighth Amendment. The Eighth Amendment protects people from “cruel or unusual punishment”. Some might view that keeping them in prisons is wrong and against their will.
Bennett Reisner Justifications for Punishment and the Prospect of Reform in Early America I. Introduction In Early America, justifications for legal punishment informed the severity of sentences and shaped opportunities for reform. Justifications for punishment fell into numerous categories, including: pragmatic or utilitarian justifications, justifications based in English common law, religious or moral justifications, justifications based on the need to maintain the existing social order, and purely punitive justifications. In particular, Early Americans offered a litany of rationalizations for the practices of imprisoning debtors and executing criminals.
The United States Constitution was constructed from a set of rules, also known as amendments, which were written with the great intention of securing the basic rights of all United States citizens and as such, it serves as an outline for the laws of the land by dictating the powers of the people and what is acceptable under the watch of the United States government. These rights are considered a privilege afforded to the people and should be exercised as indicated within the document. The history behind the induction of the second amendment began in the nineteenth century when in the summer of 1787, the Framers (included US Presidents) conspired with one another to write the articles of the United States Constitution during the constitutional convention. Fifty-five men drafted this document which serves as the blueprint of the United States government today. The motivation to construct and devise such a plan was created in order to give American citizens the absolute rights to proper enjoyment over their own lives.
It’s Not working out. By:Taija Jones. The 8th amendment says “Excessive bail shall not be required, Nor excessive fines imposed, Nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” . With that being said if the 8th amendment applies for cruel punishments of death penalties then why is it still happening.
6th Amendment I personally find that out of all the amendments the most important one is the 6th amendment. Reason being that it is crucial in aiding the judicial process from wrongly persecuting innocent people and it allows our democratic process to continue without preventing innocent people for taking the fall while punishing those who harm it. It keeps justice in check, keeping laws in line and rulings to be fair. The 6th amendment helps the defendants have an attorney when they are unable to afford one.
The meaning of the Constitution may be puzzling and unclear but I find that the Living Constitution approach is the most practical for making judgements about particular cases. If I were a justice in the Supreme Court, I would use this approach because it’s based on a system that the document of the Constitution sets up a set of timeless principles that are applied in today’s world and not simply based on the time when it was written. The Constitution should be used to help solve problems by coming up with what these principles mean when applied in today’s world. An example of this is the controversy of whether marriage can or cannot be denied to gay people because of equality.