Malorie Broussard HIST 1302 November 17, 2016 Renée Celeste Vindicate Or Be Vindicated “Impetuosity, boastfulness, recklessness, daring” (19) – all traits that described Andrew Jackson as a human and as our country’s seventh president. Moreover, this is what James C. Curtis thinks of Jackson. In Curtis’s biography, Andrew Jackson and the Search for Vindication, Curtis describes Jackson’s life from birth to death in a psychological way through his tenacious personality and lifelong quest for power. Through his martial fame, heroism, and presidency, he was considered a “sick man” (53). Persuaded by Professor Peter Carroll of Stanford, James Curtis was intrigued by Jackson’s personal down falls. “While often critical of the hero, I have tried …show more content…
In 1815, Jackson led his out numbered army to defeat the British in The Battle of New Orleans. Prideful of his victory, he had wished “[his mother] could have lived to see this day” (66). Growing up the youngest and named after his dead father, he never wanted to disappoint his mother. For those reasons Andrew Jackson seemed to always feel like he had to prove himself self to people, more so himself. Yet, the Battle of New Orleans “made him the outstanding hero of the conflict, and perhaps the most popular man in America” (Wiltse …show more content…
Curtis portrays Jackson as he sees him. From research and scholarly help, he grasps an inside on how Jackson felt on certain stressful situations. This psychological aspect of history is fascinating to me and stands out over other bibliographies. Jackson, when pronounced the new president after two elections, said “‘[he was] filled with gratitude, still [his] mind [was] depressed’” (92). He was coming into a presidency characterized my negative personal attacks and mourning over the death of his wife. Although Jackson was a fighter, his emotions could not win this battle. The negative aspect of this work is the tone of the book. Curtis seems to be very one sided and only expresses the way Jackson felt. I would have liked to see how other people he influenced thought of his decisions. Unlike Cady Stanton’s biography, this book gets only the opinion from Jackson point of view. For example, in Elizabeth Cady Stanton: A Radical for Woman’s Rights, Lois Banner, author, investigated into Stanton’s later family who were still alive which gave Banner a more personal insight into her
“The Birth of Modern Politics” is about the 1828 presidential election, which pitted Andrew Jackson vs. against John Quincy Adams. Parson’s book also discusses the events in Andrew Jackson’s and John Quincy Adams’ lives leading up to it as well. The book opens by giving background information about Andrew Jackson and his achievements. Specifically, his success in conquering the Native Americans at the battle of New Orleans and his humble origins made Jackson America’s first “man of the people” candidate for the 1824 election. However, during the 1824 election, Jackson had lost to Adams to which his followers claimed he was denied and should have won.
In the novel, Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man, writer James Weldon Johnson explores what life was like for a particularly privileged light skinned African American man at the end of the 19th century. Through the novel, he outlines a phenomenon called “cultural tourism”; in which describes a person of one culture who travels through another culture without really having the true experience of it. A cultural tourist engages in another culture’s history, language, art, music, even superstitions, all while posing as a clandestine member of that same culture. By examining the case of a “white” person touring and absorbing black culture; there is an identity crisis of the unnamed narrator that through a series of events; places him in a position
In 1814-1815 the battle of New Orleans caused many soldiers, both British and American, to lose their lives. Since this battle there have been many roaring debates as to whether or not Andrew Jackson should be president due to the fact that people were elected for being heroes of war. Although General Jackson was considered a war hero in his time, with the knowledge we have today, it’s questionable that he would of still been considered the hero he was thought of then. Andrew Jackson fought for the Americans in the battle of New Orleans to defend New Orleans against the British in one of the most pointless battles of the century, where nothing was lost but nothing was gained other than military status for General Jackson and a song we as Americans
Andrew Jackson once said, “You must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing.” Jackson was known for many things, but being honorable wasn’t one of them. He was admired by the people for always fighting, but this was a reprobate trait. The price that Jackson paid to “secure the blessing” was not of his own, but of the lives of other people. He was from a poor background and was the first self made man in the White House.
Based on the major events that occurred in Jackson’s life, our group has come to the conclusion that Andrew Jackson was a bad president. This final resolution was reached after visiting numerous sources regarding both perspectives of this argument. The events that make up our argument comprise of the elimination of the Bank of the United States, the legalization of the Indian Removal Act, and other small but major incidents. We will also be dismantling several opposing arguments, such as the Jacksonian Democracy, and thus reinforcing our frame of mind. Firstly, Andrew Jackson is a substandard president due to his eradication of the Bank of the United States.
According to Thomas P. Abernethy, Jackson was “a frontier nabob who took sides against the democratic movement in his own state…an opportunist for whom democracy was good talk with which to win the favor of the people and thereby accomplish ulterior objectives.” Different views of Jackson continued the debate about who he really was as a leader. It was not until historian Arthur Schlesinger, took a different look at the study of Jackson. He believed that Jackson’s presidency was designed to suppress the power of capitalists, and try to help those of the lower classes. Other historians continued to disagree with Schlesinger, while others supported his idea or enhanced it, saying Jackson was almost similar to a Marxist.
Andrew’s image was highlighted as a man of the people fighting corruption “(class notes/recorded notes, chapter 11)”. Andrew Jackson is looked upon as the President who imbedded the patronage which is considered the
Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.
Coming into the courtroom I believe Jackson was a vicious president who just wanted to kill to get his way, but in the trial, I came to the consensus that Jackson isn’t always that angry old man people perceive him to be. Sure, he’s killed many people and could’ve possibly led to many more deaths, but his crimes against humanities was never fully brought to light. I believed, that prosecution proved that he was an immoral, violent and at times vicious president, but they never proved he committed a large enough crime to affect humanity. In the opening statements, prosecution called Jackson a president that failed to do his job.
In regards to the Jacksonian historian’s remark about whether America should "celebrate or apologize for Andrew Jackson. " I am also torn in between celebrating all Andrew Jackson’s passion and strides in American history or to keep in mind all of his scandals, his hot temper and his take on slavery. Jackson was known for his passion. He started off as an orphan and then grew on to be the President of the United States; many people admired him for this aspect. The battle in New Orleans put Jackson on the map and gave him great recognition.
Andrew Jackson, being a tyrant, abused his power in his time of presidency. He was the 7th president, but before Jackson’s presidency, he had no political experience. One of the only things that really qualified him was the hardships he went through when he was younger. His father had died while Jackson was young and Jackson received the reputation as a “self-made man”, or an independent man.
The time has come to make a judgement of the great Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States from 1829~1837. Although some people didn’t like Jackson very well due to very few of his decisions, he made many good decisions during his presidency. Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero of the common man due to his unifying leadership, generous approach of governing, and concern for economic equality. The first reason that Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero is because of his unifying leadership.
Curtis tries to show that Jackson was always searching for personal vindication. The book goes into great detail of how Jackson would deal with these feelings.
Born into a non-aristocratic poor family, somewhere in the Carolina’s on March 14, 1767, was a man named Andrew Jackson. Jackson, also called “Old Hickory” was a very bold proactive man in American history. From being a military hero and founding the democratic party to enacting the trail of tears and dismantling the of the Bank of the United States, the man and his legacy are a prominent topic for scholarly debate. Some believe he was a great president and some believe he was the worse president. But if you look at it from a moral perceptive or in the eyes of a foreigner, Jackson’s legacy was far more villainous than heroic.
Dolly Madison, Francis Scott Key, and Andrew Jackson were important individuals in the War of 1812 because Madison was brave in the face of danger, Key was strong in the time of doubt, and Jackson was persistent in the line of fire. First, Dolly Madison was brave in the face of danger. For example, Dolly was one of the last people out of the burning White House to save George Washington’s picture. Since she could have been killed by the British Army, she is brave. Second, Francis Scott Key was strong in the time of doubt.