McCandless went to the wild thinking he could find himself and happiness because he thought happiness comes from loneliness which he should be admired for. McCandless find happiness by being on road on his own which makes him feel independent. On this trip he encounter many people whom he get along very well, but he leaves all of those people. As a matter of fact McCandless could have stayed with Jan Burres if he just wants to be on road, but he didn’t because that’s not that he wants. He wants to be independent which he thinks can happen by being alone. “When he left, we never expected to hear from him again.” (Krakauer 31). Jan Burres told Krakauer that Mccandless left her and Bob, he did that because he is relying on the person somehow by being with them which McCandless does not want. In the same way he left Ronald Franz and Wayne Westerberg even though he sees Westerberg as a father figure. “Westerberg was both shorthanded and very busy, so he asked McCandless to postpone his …show more content…
He is well educated man from a nice family background. He could have had all the luxuries things, but he choose something more beautiful. For example he choose to burn all his money knowing he would need it in the future. “He told us about abandoning his car, about burning all his money.” (Krakauer 30). He abandoned his car and burned his money because for him happiness doesn’t comes from money or car. People were happy long before cars were invented so they could be happy again without car. Not only he burns his money, but he also gives it away to charity. “Was that he would shortly donate all the money in his college fund to OXFAM America.” (Krakauer 20). He gives away all his money because he thought that money can take ones happiness by making them slave to other person. Of course his main reason for going into the wild is to find Christopher
(Krakauer, Jon. 1996) Throughout the whole story, it seems like McCandless went into the wild to ponder nature but from this analysis from Krakauer, it is clear that he went to explore the spiritual connection between himself and
Do you believe “Alex” Christopher Johnson McCandless was successful? Many people say Alex was not successful in any way. Why burn 25,000 dollars and hitchhike to Alaska. “Some readers admires the boy immensely for his courage and noble ideals; others fulminated that he was a reckless idiot, a wacko, a narcissist who perished out of arrogance and stupidity”(Krakauer, Authors note). I Believe Alex was very successful at times, but there were times he was not at all.
Miller states in his article “Tragedy and the Common Man” that to be a tragic hero, one must fit into certain criteria. One of them includes the hero’s primary struggle to search for their sense of dignity and identity. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a book about Chris McCandless who abandons his current life to explore the world in search of his real self but dies in the process. He fits this particular criteria about being a tragic hero because he abandoned everything he had som he could go find himself. McCandless did not think this decision through because he had no idea what he was getting himself into and as miller says the protagonist cannot be stupid, insensitive, or incapable of overcoming obstacles.
He felt that he could live by himself in the wilderness without them, which didn't workout that way. In Krakauer's novel he mentions McCandless “wanted to prove to himself that he could make it own his own, without anybody else’s help.” (Krakauer 159) which shows how rebellious McCandless really was. I think if he wasn’t so rebellious and had different philosophical views that he wouldn’t have made the actions he did to go into the Alaskan wilderness and would've lived a normal
Where there wasn’t anyone to tell him, no, don’t follow that route. We don’t want you to hinder all that we have indure, your parents want more for you.. He grew weary of his surroundings, he tried too hard to make sense of the everyday world. Tired of the representation of a good samaritan, McCandless could care less what everyone else did, prior to that very moment. He wanted to choose the path that he wanted, just like his heroes Jack London and David Thoreau.
Mccandless sense of self confidence while trying to find his identity helped him to progress in life, but was also his greatest downfall; Into the Wild demonstrates self confidence as not an unacceptable trait to have, but the significance of the negative or positive effects it can possess. Confidence played a big role in Mccandless life, so much that he created relationships with his family and other people that caused him to go on his adventures. Throughout this book Mccandless expresses his hate towards his parents. When he was old enough to realize that his dad had cheated on his mom this particular aspect changed him.
Some would say “Life on the road is suited for everyone”, others such as for myself, would disagree. Life on the road is not suited for everyone, because not everyone can throw away their normal life and go on the road or the wilderness and survive like Chris McCandless. Some would think, Chris McCandless, was on a suicide mission but he was only following his dreams and he actually did, unlike many people. Chris McCandless inspired so many people to move out, leave their old lives, and have a fresh start at their life. Chris McCandless was a independent person and he was trying to get away from civilization because he felt like he never fit into it.
Throughout Medred’s article, his critical and aggressive tone are clear indicators of his negative feelings towards McCandless. Krakauer, however, does an exceptional job of addressing his pathos. From the very beginning of the novel, Krakauer states that he “won’t claim to be an impartial biographer. McCandless’s strange tale struck a personal note that made a dispassionate rendering of the tragedy impossible” (Krakauer 2). Krakauer relays that he does not claim to be an unbiased narrator while Medred fails to acknowledge his implicit bias.
Throughout the Non-Fiction book “Into the Wild” the author Jon Krakauer traces young McCandless footsteps as he changed from Chris McCandless to Alex. More specially, Krakauer unfolds mysteries as to why McCandless abounded his previous life including his past identity. Young McCandless cuts off all connections with his family and goes into a journey to Alaska, where he encounters various obstacles. Krakauer anecdotes asserts McCandless as an individual lost trying to re-create himself.
What really drove Chris McCandless into the wild? I believe the top three of the countless reasons that drove McCandless into the wild was the emotional damage from his parents, rebellion of the youth & risk taking tendencies, and his hubris and detestation against authority and/or someone telling him what to do. Some may believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild because of his literary heroes Leo Tolstoy, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau , and Jack London but the real reason he left everything was because of those reasons. In this essay I will elaborate on why I believe those are the reasons that drove McCandless into the wild.
“If you are always trying to be normal, you will never know how amazing you can be.” ―Maya Angelou. Jon Krakauer’s true story titled Into the Wild is about a man who decides to throw away his old life and escape the rules of conventional society. Twenty-two-year-old Chris McCandless came from a well-to-do family in Virginia and, without warning, abandons everything. He changes his name, loses contact with his family, gives away his car and all his money, and begins a two-year long journey hitchhiking to Alaska where he eventually dies of starvation.
Chris McCandless abandoned the modern world and chose the wild because he believed that he could improve himself through living in the wild, and found the true happiness of the life. McCandless abandoned his wealthy family because of his complicated relationship with his father, and he was ashamed with his father’s adultery. Therefore, McCandless believed that human relationship was not the only thing that forms happiness, instead a man’s connection with the nature brings joy as well. He also believed the habitual lifestyle was not what people were meant to do, and people shouldn't have more possessions than what they need. For this reason, McCandless traveled with little effects.
Even the richest man in the world can be unsatisfied because they are missing that love from their family or they might not even have a family in the first. However, ¨A Summer Night¨ The Millionaire suicide is about a rich man tending to buy that missing puzzle piece in their heart with money. Most people don't know that rich people are depressed because they don't have that capacity of understanding that life isn't always going to be about money. That's why¨A
He is very irresponsible during this part of the story. He starts to spend his money on unnecessary stuff. You can also relate this to the youth of today. I mean of course we are a little advanced now than the youth of yesterday but we do still have some of the same characteristics.
He has learned that material wealth doesn’t always make one happy, and he has matured enough to be content with what he has in