In the article titled "Offensive Play" published in 2009 by the New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell argues that NFL players, in particular linemen, and dogfighting resemble due to the amount of violence that has been done to their bodies and the long-term effects they acquired from the amount of violence. However, this analogy that Gladwell presents throughout the article that can be viewed as a false dichotomy. Gladwell deftly manipulates his audience into believing in the analogy by the end of the article, but the truth is that the analogy is far off because of player have an option of choice.
Gladwell makes this analogy hard to follow throughout the article because of spiraling transitions between subject focus. The article started with a long
…show more content…
With those two strategies Gladwell increased his credibility as an author because of the personal narrative of the players that connects with the audiences, and the research reports that Ann McKee, who runs neuropathology laboratory at a hospital, Bennet Omalu, neuropathologist and Kevin Guskiewicz, Sports Concussion Researcher, provide that supports the claim that Gladwell is trying to make with his argument. Throughout the article, there were lengthy paragraphs focused on the narrative stories and as well as the doctors report However, Gladwell does use those two strategies when talking about dogfighting, but the length talked about dogfight is small that the reader forgets the analogy. Dogfighting is mention in the article at the being of the article with Michael Vick scandal and exert from the "The Social Milieu of Dogmen and Dogfights," article from a journal titled Deviant Behavior and doesn't refer back to dogfighting until the end of the article with the Michael Vick scandal and the Best Friends Animal …show more content…
Gladwell highlights Kyle Turley eagerness to get back to practice after so many injuries. However, the psychological state of mind that a player is different from what a dog has when it comes to a matter of choice. "[I]s no more than a dog's "desire to please an owner at any expense to itself," that argument that Carl Semencic makes in "The World of Fighting Dogs"(1984). A dog has no choice in either it fights or not because it is trained on loyalty to please its owner at in cost, whereas a player has a choice of where his loyalty is directed to. In conclusion, player choices push his body is a matter of choice, whereas a dog pushes his or her bodies to please his owner because the bond of loyalty
The beginning of the 2014 season for the NFL has already started out to be a rough one. Several terrible things have happened to give the NFL a bad name this season. One of the biggest things to already happen this season is the Ray Rice incident. Then, before this even happened the NFL had the drug problem of Josh Gordon with the illegal substance abuse.
A Need for Change Anticipation builds while players’ line in formation. Electric seconds pass while the quarterback yells the play. Shockingly, the players’ crash together in an explosion of energy, aggression, and sod. Televisions across America play this scenario over and over every Sunday during football season. Enthralled by the sheer athleticism and excitement of the sport, fans watch religiously, eyes glued to the screen.
The book highlights the good and the bad of the sport. For someone who may not be too interested in it, or just has to read it for a history class, he made it entertaining. Giving not only a history lesson on the sport but just as much on the working class of America and the emerging commercialized leisure’s and shifting social classes in the nineteenth century. Gorn is able to interweave social and political issues of the times all told with characters as colorful and wild as the early days of this country. Men crave the order of violence with rules and attach elevated importance to such contests in part because so much of life is entirely unjust and oppressive.
(Tobias Wolff) One quote that exceptionally explains my claims on the man and the dog's relationship is, "Once, sensing danger, he made the dog go ahead. The dog did not want to go. It hesitated until the man
In his article, Gladwell repeatedly elaborates his claim on the aspects of previous school shootings, by providing quoted interviews. Thus supporting his credibility and creating trust between the author and audience. Gladwell appears to have acquired the knowledge of such events therefore, exemplifying to the reader his credibility, adding onto and advancing his argument. Along with his credibility, Malcolm Gladwell uses several logical statements such as “But, beyond those facts, the great puzzle is how little school shooters fit any kind of pattern.” (Page 3)
One author argued that football was a manifestation of humanity’s primal bloodlust; another stressed that brutish play preserved the Machismo ideal. All the books, however, seemed to draw a common conclusion: football’s tolerance for ferocity was systemic. I had a hunch that this culture of violence was far-reaching, but I needed specific evidence to prove it. To explore society’s role, I returned to JumboSearch and tracked down sources beyond the Tisch Stacks. I read into the bounty scandal that rocked the NFL, and tracked down initial reports and policy statements issued in response by League officials.
Rhetorical questions In his expository text, “Blink”, Malcom Gladwell uses rhetorical questions to get the reader interested in the content of the book. This trend begins in the introduction where Gladwell introduces the idea that the subconscious mind has extraordinary abilities that people do not know about. After the Getty museum was asked to buy a Greek Kouro statue that was in almost perfect condition. The Getty performed an investigation to determine whether the Kouro was a forgery or not.
In 1940, 18 players died as a result of spinal injuries, fractured skulls and broken ribs. (pg. 9 and 10) I find it clever that Almond begins the section with a quote by a very well known American president. “I believe in..rough, manly sports. I do not feel any particular sympathy for the person who gets battered about a good deal as long as it is not fatal.”
Thesis Statement Kids are literally just dying to play football. This project is intended to dissect the reason why children playing football can sustain a traumatic brain injury. Youth football can cause traumatic brain injuries. This exposes why football is damaging to kids. Methodology The first step I took toward researching my project was, choosing a topic.
Gladwell’s Argument in Outliers Success is a concept that is constantly altered and has a different meaning from person to person. The stereotypical definition of success would be someone who has a high-paying job or is in the upper-class. Malcolm Gladwell, the author of Outliers: The Story of Success, approaches the concept of success in a different and unique way. Gladwell discusses how opportunities, cultural legacy, and hard work all coincide with each other to produce real success. He uses mostly logic and multiple unrelated anecdotes to support and provide evidence for his statements.
Several examples are given throughout the essay such as torturing dogs, misogyny, sex crimes, disrespecting family, and the belief of hurting someone or jeopardizing one’s intelligence, health, and morality in order to be ranked first (Paragraphs 7, 10, 12, and 13). Believing these actions will be copied and accepted by the world, Lipsyte predicts society will become a darker, more despotic place if Jock Culture continues (Paragraph 12). He also believes that those labelled as Pukes should not be discriminated against because of their lack to participate in sports; everyone should be treated equally with equal opportunity instead of categorized (Paragraph 13). Lipsyte’s ending is a paradoxical beginning for the game of Jocks vs. Pukes leaving a cliffhanger on who will win the
The Most Dangerous Game Conflicts All stories have to have a conflict, the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell has three important conflicts. Man against man, man against nature, man against himself are the three main conflicts that take place. For man against man Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting each other in the hunting ‘game’. For man against nature Rainsford is fighting the sea once he hears the gunshots and is trying to get out of the water.
behavior, learning and memory of an individual ( 1). While Dr. Noble noted the more affluent children possessed larger hippocampuses than their disadvantaged counterparts (Brain Trust 47), Hanson notes that the lifestyle of less affluent families affect the hippocampus negatively. For instance, maternal separation can negatively impact the hippocampus, I.e. working mother's. The lower the income a household has, the more stress it faces. Outstanding stress can have long-lasting negative effects on the hippocampus (1.).
Adrenaline pulsing through my body and anxiety filling up in my stomach, I quickly throw on my football gear and head out to the practice field. It’s a nice hot day in Ocala, Florida, with the sun beating down on our necks, we stand side by side in line waiting to be picked to play second, third, or fourth string in a play. Waiting in anticipation, each of us grinding our teeth, watching first string pure athletes colliding against each other like gladiators to have possession of a ball made at one-time of “pig’s skin”. To some people, the game of American football makes no sense, whether it’s the idea of trying to protect a ball or running and passing it to make a goal for your team. People like this, see the concept of football and understand why millions of people love it; but to them the sport is pointless and causes way too many casualties.
Mark Twain believes that dogs are superior to man because out of all animals, man is the only one that is cruel enough to inflict pain on others just for the pleasure of doing it. Twain’s short story “A Dog’s Tale”, written in 1903, displays these beliefs and is done so from a dog’s point of view. This unusual take on the story is used to help convey the theme that one shouldn’t assume the others will do the same for them. The story includes literary elements such as characterisation, structural irony and a plot and conflict. It is a story of a loyal and heroic dog which unfortunately ends in an ironic twist of fate.