Well-known leader for a Responsible Society, Terry Newell, in his essay, “Fostering Civic Virtue,” depicts how America has lost sight of their civic responsibilities. Newell’s purpose is to alert readers to the steady decline of civic virtue in America. He creates an irritated tone in order to convey to his readers that our nation is straying from the path George Washington built for us. Due to his tone and evidence, his argument is well supported and effective. Newell opens his essay by emphasizing how George Washington’s busy work schedule did not conflict with the seriousness of his civic duty. He quotes George Washington in his Farewell Address, “I beg you…to do me the justice to be assured that this resolution has not been taken without a strict regard to all the considerations appertaining to the relation which binds a dutiful citizen to his country” (1). Newell moves to praise George Washington due to the fact that he came out of retirement twice and none of that impacted his responsibility to his nation. He praises George Washington in order to demonstrate the ideal citizen, one who works hard and never forgets his civic duty. The appraisal of George Washington conveys an inspiring tone that forces the reader to remember the core values that this nation was built upon. Newell furthers his argument by quoting parts of the Farewell …show more content…
He states that Americans consistently involve themselves in the community and are eager to help one another. However, he declares that this alone is not enough. Our liberty depends on the strength of our government and the bond of our people. Newell emphasizes that the bond of our people should not be forced, instead it should be from the heart with “sympathy and interest” for one another (2). His nostalgic tone revives the communities America used to have and ignites determination in the reader to foster civic
The World of George Washington Plunkitt by William L. Riordon. It is a collections of talks and writing of Plunkitt detailing about his life, politics, and general knowledge of the public. Many reformers saw the organization of Tammany Hall as a corrupt malignancy that plagued the American government. But Plunkitt argues that his work was always practical, legal and influential and helped shape the democratic system for the better. And as for his fortune, he simply states, “I seen my opportunities and I took em.”
In the book of His Excellency: George Washington by Joseph J. Ellis, the author introduces Washington, the Father of the United States, in a fresh portrait focused on the characters of Washington. This book is an impressive biography of Washington's remarkable dedication to the United States history. According to the author, George Washington is an omnipresent figure as he was growing up, described as the man in the moon who was aloof and silent. This book focuses on Washington's wartime service which became some of his major contributions to the United States, rather than merely telling the true story of Washington, its main thesis is focusing on analyzing his contributions and how his governorship had affected the American history. Washington's life is divided into three areas in this book.
“How To Be Presidential” is an informative text written by Edward G. Lengell that analyzes and lays out George Washington's rise to power. It describes the decisions and choices that led Washington to be a powerful and impactful leader. In this Biography of Washington, Lengell uses many figures of speech to get his point across in a way that is not only informative, but enjoyable to read. Lengell uses many creative words and phrases. He also structures his paragraphs in very easy to read and understandable formats.
In An Imperfect God, Henry Wiencek presents George Washington as a specific case through which to study what he calls the great “paradox” of American history: how a nation founded on the philosophies of liberty and equality also kept human beings in chains. Washington was a slave-owner his entire life and he took the role of managing the slaves who lived and worked at Mount Vernon including their purchase and sale. Prior to the Revolution, Washington “was just another striving young planter, blithely ordering breeding wenches for his slave trade, blithely exiling a man to a likely death at hard labor” (Wiencek 133) The fortune produced by Washington’s slaves kept him in the ranks of Virginia’s planter elite, securing the social and political prestige that helped lead the Second Continental Congress to appoint him commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in 1775.
Introduction: In the text by Eboo Patel “Acts of Faith: The Story of an American Muslim, the Struggle for the Soul of a Generation,” Patel focuses on living in a diverse faction full of religious prejudice in a world full of materialistic outlooks. At the same time he intertwines his personal experiences and provides a remarkable account in which he says that growing up in America as a Muslim led him to discover the importance of cultural pluralism, the acceptance of all religions, and his huge account that all Muslims aren’t extremists. He believes in ethnocentrism; religions should be able to coexist without feeling that one religion is superior than the other. In a world where the forces that seek to divide us are strong, Patel thinks the meaning of pluralism is that the differences
How can improvements be made without the people who want the improvements don’t make an effort? Giving American citizens the responsibility to improve their own lives may cause setbacks, but it is the outcome of these setbacks that enable change and allow further quality of life. Without American citizens taking initiative to improve their own lives, they will be never be satisfied with the quality of their own lives. Many improvements in this world such as freedom and rights were not established through citizens counting on authority to make this change. It was the people who were affected by this dilemma that took action that ended up giving a new meaning to life.
Written by Thomas Paine in 1791, the book “Rights of Man” soughts to describe the characteristics of America. Although he did include some accurate descriptions of America in his writing, considering the time the book was written and the fact that he was a revolutionary and a supporter of American independence, there are some descriptions that do not concur with the current-day America and some descriptions that are biased as well. Paine asserts that America is made up “of people from different nations, accustomed to different forms and habit of government, speaking different languages, and more different in their modes of worship,” and this assertion still holds true till this day. America fundamentally was, and still is, a melting pot of different people and culture (Paine).
George Washington was a great leader. “He respected all his men and listen to their ideas one by one.” This makes happy his men to be treated with respect to be listening. They feel like humans. Doing this make people want to work that help run well the United States.
Although unrelatable and underappreciated in the eyes of modern history, George Washington shows his greatness through his character. Contemporary culture often neglects to recognise Washington’s greatness. Sadly, he has become a figure so far removed from the ideals and lives of modern Americans, that his name often provokes boredom. Nonetheless, his character proved to be perfect for what America needed during his life. His greatness was largely due to chance.
First of all, George Washington is one of many that influenced society today. He was the general that led America to be its own free
He first juxtaposes his preface of Louverture with a contribution about the prodigious American President and military leader, George Washington. This petitions nationalist emotions in the audience as a Haitian Negro is preceded by a prominent American leader. By inserting the two names alongside each other, Phillips accentuates an intended comparison between the two in terms of renown. Phillips demonstrates the triumph of Washington, whom Americans respect as “no marble white enough on which to carve the name of the Father of his Country.” Through the use of hyperbole, Phillips expresses to the audience the haughty attitude each country holds in recognizing national heroes.
When hearing George Washington’s Farewell Address for the first time it is easy to understand it is well written and the substance is things he really felt is important. However once the time is spent relating his speech to todays times and problems the magnitude of his word is really understood. Almost 250 years later and 44 more presidents, George Washington’s thoughts still apply perfectly to the current state of the U.S. So much has change sense he gave this address but unity, Stoping the divide of political parties, morality, and avoiding entangling
A respected author John Green questions, "Why is being a nerd bad? Saying I notice you 're a nerd is like saying, ‘Hey I knows that you 'd rather be intelligent than be stupid, that you 'd rather be thoughtful of them be vapid, that you believe that there things that matter more than the arrest record of Lindsay Lohan and why is that?” Many people who are passionate about their studies question the same thing. Leonid Fridman wrote a passage “America Needs its Nerds” in order to raise concern that our society does not value intelligence. Fridman uses compare and contrast to get his point across to the readers.
A common stereotype in our country today is that people are lazy and only concerned for themselves, it will be shown in these individual’s stories this stereotype is false. As this story continues, the reader will be able to hear about some of the different reasons why each of these people wanted to go to Washington D.C. I will begin with my own personal discoveries while on this pilgrimage to our nation’s capital. I am
Individuals lay the foundation of America. The Founding Fathers of this unique nation broke their allegiance with Great Britain to create an improved governing body. They desired an individual-centered authority as opposed to Britain’s monarchy, which ruled with tyranny. These Founding Fathers experienced a neglectful democratic monarchy that cared little about the ethical treatment of its people. The domineering actions of Britain challenged these historic individuals to form a new cultural identity.