ipl-logo

Analysis Of You Still Need Your Brain By Daniel Willingham

607 Words3 Pages

Nowadays when we are not sure of question we turn towards the Internet, to try and find answers. In the Article "You Still Need Your Brain," Daniel Willingham argues that memorizing facts remains an essential skill even in today's world of internet searches. He builds his argument by first acknowledging the importance of technology and then explaining why it cannot replace human memory. . Willingham provides scientific evidence and real-life examples to support his claim, making a compelling case for the value of memorization in our ever-changing world.

Willingham argues that the Internet Is good for learning new things, however It should not come to the point where you use It for your brain's memorazation. In the Article "You Still Need Your Brain" Willingham states " Students should learn the information for which the internet is a poor substitute. Getting information form the internet, takes tiem, so they should memorize facts that are needed fast and frequently. Elementary math facts and the sounds of letters are obvious choices, but any information that is needed with high frequency is a candidate - in algebra , that's the quadratic equation". Willingham infers that rather than looking up facts that we use In our everyday life to instead study and memorize it. Sure this takes longer than just going on the web, but …show more content…

He says the following "The meaning of “spill” depends on context, but dictionaries, including internet dictionaries, necessarily offer context-free meanings. That’s why kids fall off cliffs meticulously." Willingham believes that having background knowledge, context knowledge, in which information is presented Is essential for comprehending and applying that knowledge. Without this knowledge, he thinks that students will struggle to make sense of they see on the web or may misinterpet

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    977 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicolas Carr analyzes the dramatic affects that technologies have been having on our brains. The short summary, the Net is making us all mindless zombies in Carr’s mind, but he is not the only who feels that way. His long dragged out article is abundantly full of meaning examples, personal opinions, and hard facts on the drastic changes the Net has done to our brains. Carr starts his articles with the death of super computer, HAL, from the movie A Space Odyssey.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    224 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the author, Nicholas Carr, is arguing against the effect of our increased access to information. He is unsettled by the common idea that we’d all “be better off” if our brains were supplemented, or even replaced, by an artificial intelligence. Carr describes how am immediate access to a rich store of information from the Net has shaped his process of thought by reducing his capacity for concentration and contemplation. He is worried that placing efficiency and immediacy above all else is weakening our capacity to make rich mental connections that form when we read deeply without distraction. Carr uses an anecdote of the printing press to demonstrate how equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    273 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” Nicholas Carr argues that Google is deteriorating the human mind. He mentions that people no longer want or even need to deeply read information and retain it because the particular information that they are looking for can just be Googled. In fact, he argues against this by stating that everything is not available on Google, and things that are available on Google are not necessarily true. Another con of this, he states, is that it is extremely difficult to read off of a computer screen. Carr argues that people’s brains are not programmed to read something in depth if it is off of a computer or phone screen.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    162 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” (2008), Nicholas Carr argues that the use of the internet has affected human beings to process information. For example, reading in front of a screen and reading a printed book is not the same thing. Carr supports his assertion by his own and others experiences reading and searching information online and viewing how it has negatively shaped their ability to read long texts. He states that he cannot concentrate reading a long piece for a certain amount of time without losing focus. His purpose is to is to warn the internet and technology users of the adverse mental effects that these devices have on individuals.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    313 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that the internet has been changing the way of human cognition. He supports his argument by emphasizes the negative experience that the readers are difficult to focus on deep reading when they read online. In addition, he illustrates the professionals’ studies and explanations of how new technology influences the internet users’ cognition. He concerns that artificial intelligence has slowly changed and has controlled human brain activity.

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Whole New Mind By Daniel Pink

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    A Whole New Mind by Daniel Pink discusses the shift of our generation's needs for different types of thinkers. According to the book, there are two types of thinking. Left-directed or left-brained and right-directed or right-brained thinking. L-directed thinkers are much more analytical and factual than R-directed thinkers, who are artistic, sympathetic, and more emotional. In the past, the industrial age required physical laborers, mostly for factory work; however, as the informational age crept in, the need for l-brained people expanded.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google making us Stupid?” (731-745) his thesis is, “...what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation.” (733) According to Carr, the Internet affects the way that we read, think, and live. It affects the way we read because through the continued use of the Internet we have been conditioned to skim through information quickly and efficiently.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    and we no longer need to retain the information we read because it’s always there. However, people still have to work for the information they want as they need to sift through thousands of sites to find accurate information. With sifting through these sites, they have to do work, which if they were

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Jason Peters 'Cooling Down Our Brain'

    83 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Cooling Down Our Brain,” Jason Peters talked about how researchers proved that self-control can be developed by specific mental exercises. He explained an experiment named “the marshmallow test” and how the result of the experiment showed that children who had self-control became more successful in their lives than those who did not have it. The author further stated that additional research showed that the human brain has “hot” and “cool” areas and everyone can train the “cool” part to control the impulses.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    1160 Words  | 5 Pages

    The debate is whether the physical and physiological changes are detrimental. In 2008 The Atlantic publishes an article by Nicholas Carr who discusses his take on the critical conversation presenting what the internet is doing to our brains in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. When analyzing Nicholas Carr’s stance on the argument, one would both agree and disagree with Carr. The

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    866 Words  | 4 Pages

    For example, “What happened?’ He speculates on the answer: ‘What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed” Carr says that the internet is a way to seek convenience but also because of the way people think. Overall the cognition of humans are negatively affecting their ability to read long

    Read More

  • Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    Technological advancements are capable of filling people with hope but fear as well. Nicholas Carr has written an intriguing article titled, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” which discusses how technology is changing the way we as humans think. Carr believes that technology is changing us negatively by shortening our attention span and preventing in depth thought and study. Through his article, Carr effectively demonstrates the manner in which technology is negatively impacting the way we think. One effective point Carr uses in his argument is fueled by historical evidence.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    It has happened many times, reading a full page only to realize none of the information was retained. Was it always this way? Nicholas Carr thinks he knows what happening, in “Is Google Making us Stupid?” he discusses the fact that technology is having a negative impact on our thinking and learning. He holds the belief that technology is changing the way our brains process information, which is affecting attention spans and the ability to think critically. Carr’s article is an effective analysis on the impact technology has on our brains.

    Read More

  • The Shallows Summary

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    (The Shallows, Pg. 173) Socrates was onto something, just not in the right in the right part of history. With all of the knowledge available online and just a few key strokes away, there comes a loss of the long term memory. Why retain any knowledge if it just a hyperlink away?

    Read More

  • The Disadvantages Of The Behaviourist Approach In Education

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    The more important the information the more likely the individual will be able to recall that information later. However, the meaning is placed on the information itself and not on how the information obtained, as with the behaviourist approach. Cognitive learning theories deal with the issue of how people process and store information to gain an understanding of themselves and the environment, and how their thinking and reasoning influence their actions and reactions (Henson and Eller,

    Read More

More about Analysis Of You Still Need Your Brain By Daniel Willingham

Open Document