In 1996, Barry Loukaitis, 14 years old, walked into his junior high school in Moses Lake Washington and killed two students and a teacher. He reportedly told friends, at least eight of them according to the article (Dedham 2000) of his thoughts of killing others. He also reportedly had spoke of this for a year prior to the shooting incident. He spoke of specific details such as using a coat to hide a rifle as he did in his shooting. He actually told one friend as relayed by the friend, “ He said that it’d be cool to kill people” and as this friend went on to say Loukaitis had said “He could probably get away with it.” Other examples of the motivations such as bullying and tormenting which led to revenge are referenced in Dedman’s report. He …show more content…
At the time it was the most horrific in terms of the number of students killed, reported at 13 and 24 reportedly wounded. According to USA Today, Greg Toppo 2009, the two perpetrators of this tragic event had intentions of killing thousands. And the two, Eric Harris and Dylan Kleboid, were a contrast when compared to one another and again show why a profile cannot be developed and is a dangerous approach. The article reports the two were not bullied according to their diaries reviewed following their deaths. The two had actually bragged about being the bullies picking on “fags” and freshman. Their attack was planned in advance and reportedly for more than a year. According to Toppo, they fooled everyone including law enforcement, teachers, psychologists, their parents and their friends. The article points out that Peter Langman, an author, wrote in his book “Why Kids Kill: Inside the Minds of School Shooters” Kleboid and Harris were “kids with serious psychological problems.” Katherine Newman, renown co-author of a book in 2004, “Rampage: The Social Roots of School Shootings,” characterized Klebold and Harris as “just not accepted” and not as “loners.” She surmises they desired to be notorious by killing rather being seen by others as failures. According to Toppo’s article, Newman found in an unnamed congressionally mandated study that she participated in that other kids egg on …show more content…
They all point to the same key points including, but not limited to we must listen, develop an environment for our children where they can trust in seeking out and talking to adults and where they can feel a true and sincere sense of care and concern. Students must feel free to break the code of silence and share what they are hearing. The attacks are not sudden or impulsive, they are planned and typically someone knows from the behaviors and communications that a threat exists and these signs must not be ignored. The information must be shared and must be acted upon in a reasonable and responsible way as well as timely to prevent school-based shootings. We may never eliminate them but we must learn from the above information and the available research and use this information to act accordingly and
After 10 years of research and writing David Cullen finally published Columbine based on one of the deadliest school shootings ever. There were many signs that were missed when it came to the Columbine shooting from their parents, friends, the school, and the police. Throughout the book we see many times in which people continued to miss the warning signs and drop the ball. Parents love and care about their children a lot, but sometimes even parents can miss major warning signs. In David Cullen's Columbine we see many times throughout the book where Eric and Dylans parents missed a lot of the signs.
The Columbine shooting of 1999 left children and adults alike, in awe. It brought media attention to a conflict between schools and created debate on whether schools are still safe or not. The nonfiction book, Columbine, by Dave Cullen, expresses detailed events leading up to the murders and the effects it brought to schools. The articles, “A Revised Portrait of a Psychopath” (by Peter Reuell), “Columbine Killers' Basement Tapes Destroyed” (by Alan Prendergast), and “A Memorial at Last for Columbine Killings” (by Kirk Johnson and Katie Kelley), and “Psychology of Virginia Tech, Columbine Killers Still Baffles Experts” (by Susan Donaldson James) have cleared up the Columbine story. There are comparisons between the book and articles, including,
However, the two shooters seemed to be different in their own ways. They had may differe nt opinions and different motivates towrdas the shooting of Columbine High School. Eric Harris had been dreaming to shoot up the school because he believed in Natural Selection and was angry at the world. Then, Dylan Klebold had gone with the plan to shoot up Columbine since he wanted to kill himself. The plan at the end of the shooting was to kill themselves.
April 20, 1999 marks one of the most memorable tragedies in U.S. history. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris carried out their plan, prepared a year in advance, to take out their fellow classmates and staff members at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. The shooting spree left 15 people dead and 21 others wounded, some critically. After the massacre, many were left with the question of why somebody would do such a thing. How could someone even think to do something so monstrous?
On the 110th birthday of Adolf Hitler on April 20th, 1999, the most notorious school shooting in America occurred. Eric Harris and Dylan Kelbold shot and killed 12 of their peers as well as a teacher at Columbine high school in Littleton, Colorado. The tragic event sent shockwaves across America and lead to massive changes in public school safety. Serious discussions of having SROs (School Resource Officers) at every school and combating gun rights were some main takeaways people had after Columbine. These issues, however, were not the way shootings like Columbine could have been prevented.
The shooting at Columbine Hight School created a nationwide shock and horror for all people that watched the news clips. I remember going to school and not being allowed to carry our backpacks to school. The girls had to have a clear see through purse to be able to carry their personal belonging. The two shooters that were involved in the massacre at that school were Eric Harris (18 at time of shooting) and Dylan Klebold (17 at time). Both of these boys displayed abnormal behavior and I am going to explain in this essay their possible psychological issue with Eric Harris.
After his arrest Carneal stated, “people respect me now”(Leary, Kowalski, Smith and Phillips, 2003). Johnson had been repeatedly teased for being fat. Harris and Klebold both were teased, ostracized, and bullied by their peers, particularly athletes. The two boys made videos recounting instances when they had been bullied and ostracized and stated that the shooting was a form of retribution (Leary, Kowalski,
The book “Rampage The Social Roots Of School Shootings” written by Newman et al, offers many different views and theories behind the issues of Rampage school shootings. In this paper I will give the reader an in depth overview and evaluation of the aforementioned book. Offering researched based reasons to why these school shootings actually happen. They explore the communities of Heath and Westside, the grounds of two horrific acts of rampage shootings by Michael Carnell, Andrew Golden and Mitchell Johnson. They explain various angles of there research such as identifying an issue, how signals given by children can be misinterpreted, the effects of social capital and how mental factors play a role in the acts of the shooters.
At Columbine High School there had been a massacre on April 20, 1999. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were the two shooters from the Columbine massacre. After that day there had been many rumors and myths about the shooting from the media and from people. After the shooting at Columbine there had been many rumors and myths from news reporters saying the shooters were only targeting jocks but really Eric and Dylan were just trying to kill of whoever they saw.
For kids over the years dealing with abuse, bullying, and mental problem, they attended to think of a way for people to hear them cry out for help. But in this case LaDue didn 't cry out he wanted fame and by shooting or blowing up a school would, probably, he thought, would get him that fame. He would get the distance to seek fame and by killing people that were his answer. For other people it 's different and some of them don 't do it for the fame and glory they do it so people can hear their cries. What LaDue did was wrong and stupid of him how he was doing this.
I believe the biggest misconception I had about school shooters is their feelings, or what I assumed is a lack of. What I have learned about the feelings of school shooters is that there is typically a guiding factor or initial issue that festers in someone. Said issue causes this person or group of people to act out. From what I have observed, these students typically have the brightest futures yet remain the most misunderstood of all students. Most of these students who carry out shootings killing themselves in the end, giving them a lifetime worth of attention they were clearly seeking without any repercussions for their actions.
The lives of 12 students and 1 teacher were taken by two shooters, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, on April 20th, 1999. 24 others were injured in this shooting and there could, possibly, have been many more, but the propane tank bombs, that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold planted in the cafeteria, did not detonate. Students were mercilessly shot at point blank by legally purchased weapons. A tricky situation because the weapons were purchased by a friend of Klebold and Harris. This transition constituted an illegal “straw purchase.”
Although most of us are not physically involved, our nation itself is highly affected by these incidents. Every school shootings come with a political debate between gun violence and mental health and arguing which side to blame. Whether it is because of guns, mental health, or the school’s security itself something needs to be done to limit these horrid
So with all these kids dying wouldn't you agree that we need better mental health support, so we can prevent all these shootings? I believe that if we had good and strong mental health support services in the USA then tragic events like Columbine H.S. & Sandy Hook would probably never happen. That is why I am supporting for the USA to talk more about how to create more mental health support programs to help prevent gun violence events. Bibliography Works Cited CNN Library "Columbine High School Shootings Fast Facts" CNN.com (Updated April 5, 2017) (Internet) (http://www.CNN.com/2013/09/18/us/columbine-high-school-shootings-fast-facts) Culp-Ressler, Tara "10,000 Kids Are Injured Or Killed By Guns Each Year In The U.S." Pediatrics Think Progress (2014) (Internet) (https://thinkprogress.org/10-000-kids-are-injured-or-killed-by-guns-each-year-in-the-u-s-bfb1e3bf70dc)
(Sub-subpoint 1) 87% of students said that the main cause of school shootings is because they want to level the playing field. (Alfred University) 2. (Sub-subpoint 2) For example, a 12-year-old from Nevada opened fire at school because he was bullied. He was called “an idiot, a retard and gay”.