God really takes challenges seriously; he will ruin someone else’s life to test them and prove his point. The Book of Job follows a wealthy, righteous man of God named Job who is suddenly faced with many struggles and losses at the hand of Satan after God allows him to destroy Job’s life to test his faith. Job undergoes a variety of changes through his suffering and his dialogue with the various other characters in the story. One of the most notable ways his mentality progresses is through the questioning of the three friends that first visit him, Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar. After losing most of his family, his livestock, and his exceptional wealth, Job descends into a spiral of despair and catches the attention of three of his friends who come over to visit and comfort him. Although they behave as great friends at first, once they begin to question what happened and interrogate Job on why he could have faced such adversity out of nowhere, their friendship becomes questionable. Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar are only friends to a …show more content…
Job, at this point, is laying down with sores all over his body, lamenting the loss of his loved ones, and likely speaking with tears in his eyes. Eliphaz demonstrates a complete indifference towards him, and proceeds to mock him with even more rhetorical questions in the same way that Zophar did. Eliphaz confirms, full of enmity, that he despises Job’s confidence that he has not done anything wrong to merit his punishment, by stating, “What do you know that we do not know? What do you understand that is not clear to us?” (Job. 15.9) Although he was at first understanding and accepting of Job, he swiftly shifts to upsetting Job and worsening the situation through cynical debating that undoubtedly shattered their relationship. Job’s description of Eliphaz and the others as “miserable comforters” becomes increasingly correct. (Job.
Job declares this after Eliphaz has accused him of being wicked a second time. Eliphaz believes Job is not as wise as he appears, since he limits his wisdom to himself and does not listen to the wisdom of others. Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar have already accused Job of being wicked in the first cycle of speeches, and now the second cycle in “The Great Debate” has begun. Nevertheless, Job responds to Eliphaz’s accusations by calling his friends “sorry comforters” (Job 16:2) and declaring that his “friends are my scoffers” (Job 16:20). Job continues in his speech testifying that, although he is being accused of being wicked, his “prayer is pure” (Job 16:17), and he has not done any wrong.
Satan unleashes a force that kills Job’s children, servants, and destroys his home. Job does not falter his belief in god because of these tragedies. Satan again tries to challenge Job’s faith in god, by giving him physical aliments. Job’s
Rowlandson frequently alludes to the book of Job- drawing a parallel between herself and the perfect Christian martyr. By describing her captors in association with Hell, she casts them as, not only, enemies of the Puritans, but enemies of God as well. Rowlandson does suffer the wrath of her mistress; however, she is met with much kindness from other Natives. For example, she is even given a Bible by one of her “savage” captors (Rowlandson 263). She is offered food by many other Natives (Rowlandson 269).
I concurred with Job! I was not denying his existence, but I doubted his absolute justice.” (45) With this statement Eliezer is displaying that he still holds the belief in God, but chooses to keep his silence just as Job did when everything was taken from him. He cannot comprehend how a self-proclaimed God of “justice” can allow for such a monstrosity to occur, but he still believes in God’s existence. Towards the end of Night, Eliezer realizes family members have abandoned each other for a greater chance at survival and mentions “this God in whom I no longer believed.”
He still refers to Him as Almighty and recognizes His presence. Yet, he does question His righteousness and care for the Jewish people, when he questions why He would stay silent and why his fellow prisoners would worship Him. He explains his position, saying that “I had ceased to pray. I concurred with Job! I was not denying His existence, but I doubted His absolute justice” (45).
Pathos is also evident when Banneker alludes to Job, a religious figure in the Bible who endures much suffering. Towards the end of his letter, Banneker quotes Job’s message that one must “‘put [his] souls stead,’ thus shall [his] hearts be enlarged with kindness and
Like Gilgamesh, Job faced heavy heartache and pain from loss as well. Job faced terrible tragedy losing his family, home, and health. Through his long journey, and dedication to his god, he is rewarded by restored health, many children, and double the wealth that he began with. “The Book of Job recalls the Epic of Gilgamesh. Job and Gilgamesh are tested by superhuman forces, and both come to realize that misfortune and suffering are typical of the human condition.
In general, humanity forgets the message from the book of Job and at moments curses God blaming him for all humanity 's disgraces. It is important to remember how God gave Satan approval to disturb Job by leaving him in his hands. Therefore, this provides evidence that God test 's humanity, but his hand is not involved in the process, as it is represented in (Job 1:12) “The Lord said to Satan, “Very well, then, everything he has is in your power, but on the man himself do not lay a finger.”
To begin with, both Job and Prometheus were physically harmed. In the Book of Job it states “Satan struck Job with loathsome sores from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head,” (Job 2:7). Then in Prometheus Bound Hephaestus chains Prometheus to a rock and leaves him there with nothing to survive. Therefore, both men were physically harmed and put through very difficult situations physically. Another way the two stories are the same is that the two men both lost everything they ever had and loved.
Job was a man of faith, he repented for little injustices. He was tested to prove his righteousness and succeeded. His children were killed, his cattle was killed, he was painfully diseased and his was wealth diminished. Through all this he remained faithful. His so called friends told him to abandon God as he had him.
Job owns seven thousand sheep, three thousand camels, five hundred yokes of oxen, three daughters, seven sons, and a wife-in short, prosperity. In addition, he is a respectful and religious man who worships God and lives a chaste life. However, God chooses to test Job and sets a list of punishments for him, who undergoes these challenges throughout the book of Job. There is a certain contradiction in a deity that punishes those who obey, and the story emphasizes the omniscience of God’s unique role in Job’s life. God’s seemingly capricious nature demonstrates the usage of power by an omnipotent figure, in terms of beneficence, retributive justice, and exploitation.
When talking about your life compared to death, Jobs states that we are already “naked”, which serves to show that death is the great equalizer. Using formal diction sprinkled in with personal accounts, Jobs convinces the audience that he is a man that can speak confidently about some very difficult subjects in his
I concurred with Job! I was not denying His existence, but I doubted His absolute justice” (45). Before his struggle, he was emotionally and spiritually connected to God and spent so much of his time studying the Jewish faith. In contrast, after he experienced living in a concentration camp he questioned God’s motives and no longer believed in absolute justice. He doesn’t believe in the same God he once did; before, he believed in a benevolent and kind father of humankind, he now can only believe in an apathetic and cold observer of the Jew’s
Working is one of the many tasks that most adults have to endure. As for Phil, work was not just a task, but was a life commitment that took valuable time away. Ellen Goodman describes her stance of this issue in the piece, “The Company Man,” by employing repetition of important phrases and by showcasing the irony of Paul’s life. This conveys a sense of sympathy for Paul and his family and disapproval of his actions, who let his work consume his life, leading to his death. To begin, the use of repetition allowed Ellen Goodman to show her critical attitude and pity towards Phil.
Megan Broudy Teresa Matranga AP English & Composition 02 December 2015 In a passage titled, "The Company Man," by Ellen Goodman, Goodman explains the way she views Phil, the story's main character. To Goodman, Phil embodies the worst characteristics of corporate America: shallow, selfish and indifferent. To convey her dislike of Phil, she uses a myriad of rhetorical devices, including tone, repetition and satire which aid the readers' understanding of a workaholic's nature.