Philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie Should Andrew Carnegie be considered a hero for providing charities and improving the welfare of others? Andrew Carnegie was not a hero because he didn’t help those who needed it most, believed in Social Darwinism, and was leading society into a downfall. Andrew Carnegie was a man who was born poor, but became rich by investing into steel. He quickly had a monopoly, or complete control over a specific industry, over the steel industry and the richest man in the United States. He would often donate money he saw as surplus to help the community; such as building libraries, universities, and institutes. He kept finding ways to give his money away until his death, and even now his still operating corporation is one of the largest in the world. …show more content…
He would often cut the wages of his workers while giving extravagant things out to places only he cared about; such as Scotland, where he grew up. An illustration in The Saturday Globe depicts Carnegie as two faced and evil. It says; “Forty-millionaire Carnegie in his great double role. As the tightfisted employer he reduces wages that he may play philanthropist and give away libraries, etc.” (Document D). This was published only three days after the Homestead Strike at one of Carnegies Pittsburgh steel mills where several workers were killed. They entire strike, and many like it, were about cut wages for the workers. At the time Carnegie was worth millions while his workers worked 12-16 hour days, 7 days a week for a tiny fraction of that. And yet he chose to build buildings instead of paying his workers enough money so that they could afford to live and buy his
Furthermore, although the Lyle family was compensated under the Carnegie Hero Fund Commission, tens of thousands of applications for recompense were turned away. These facts help paint a picture of Carnegie’s real philanthropic motivations; to leave himself a legacy. The Amalgamated Association of Street Railway Employees, in exhibit 4, describes how creating a library benefitted richer children and Carnegie’s legacy, but robbed the impoverished community who wouldn't have time to read, because their parents were working long factory hours for little
“ The Philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie” was written in the second half of the 19th century. During this time railroads, oil, flour, and tobacco were being introduced. Nothing was more successful as the steel industry that Andrew Carnegie introduced. Andrew Carnegie is known as being a “hero” to many people during this time of period. Carnegie has courage, concern for others, and charisma.
He began his business in 1872. 30 years later, he became a world’s richest ex-businessman. He died after the end of World War I. Andrew Carnegie was not a hero in three areas of his life: Living, Business, and Charity. The first area in which Andrew Carnegie was not a hero was about Living.
His life growing up, gave him the experience of what the lower class people had to endure, he started out with nothing, but he took advantage of the opportunities he was presented with. Rockefeller, although he is portrayed as a robber baron, gave away more than half of his profit from the oil company, as well as donated one tenth of his income to charity. (The Trust and Monopoly) Despite being labeled falsely as a robber baron, he proved that he was a resourceful businessman that saw an opportunity and went for it, he used his resources and connections in the railroad company to earn him the millionaire status. With great power comes great responsibility, and these captains took it upon themselves, and realized that their responsibility, and duty to the nation, was to inform and educate the people on how to be successful as well.
Andrew Carnegie's views on wealth is almost the same as how billionaires think and use their money today . Carnegie's thought that people with money they would be able to help the poor by building libraries and other type of building that would help the middle class to get an education. He taught by helping the middle class rise from poverty and give them an education they would be able to do great things in life. Based on what I have read in both article Andrew Carnegie's views were considered ethical because he wanted what was best for the poor and he wanted to help the coal miners and give everyone an education.
They donated money to many different things and invented many different things we still use today, which make them philanthropists. Andrew Carnegie donated his money to a fund scientific research and also made a pension fund for teachers by donating ten million dollars (Andrew Carnegie). Andrew Carnegie also created one of the largest steel companies that was made cheaply and efficiently. John Rockefeller donated his money to donated almost half a billion dollars to educational, religious, and scientific programs. John Rockefeller was the head of the Standard Oil Company.
Greed – the extreme, selfish desire to acquire what is beyond average necessities. Whether greed applies to wealth or power, mankind is prone to exemplify the cupidity. Humans may never become truly content with what they are given, allowing them to desire superfluous objects. The development of greed, as shown in repeated history, eventually leads to the ruination of characters, one particular character being Andrew Carnegie. Andrew Carnegie, the leader of the steel industry in the 19th century, epitomized the concept of greed by yearning for supplementary profits within his company; this greed greatly affected the lives of many, including Carnegie himself.
Was Andrew Carnegie a hero? Did he’s new ideas, business and donations made him a hero? At that time most of the biggest and most profitable business were controlled by 3 important gentlemen, one of them was Andrew Carnegie who controlled the steel production in all America, being the steel production his monopoly, but also, he was one if not the biggest philanthropist in that time. So, does these matter for be a hero? Was him a hero?
What he did was give money to organizations, but not to the community who actually needed it. “The duty of the man of wealth is to set an example of modest living” (Document M). This says that all rich people should try and hide the money they have but, not all do that. Many people, like Carnegie, who are rich will flaunt it and not care what others say. That is not being moral or having integrity.
Carnegie was not a hero, because a hero does a deed selflessly, but he thought a lot about himself. 184,400,000 dollars was spent on big-name corporations and associations that would honor him by naming a meaningful belonging after him (Doc C). Carnegie was a man who wanted to feed his ego but should have donated money to help the community, not make himself known. Andrew Carnegie was not a true hero. Many may say, going from rags to riches makes Carnegie a hero.
The late nineteenth century was a pivotal moment in American history. During this time, the Industrial Revolution transformed the nation, railroads had dissipated all throughout the country, and economic classes began to form, separating the wealthy from the poor. One of the wealthiest men of this generation was Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant who fled to America to make millions off the railroad, oil and even steel businesses. Carnegie is considered one of the richest men in history, and even with all that wealth he decided to give back to the community. As a matter of fact, Carnegie donated most of his funds to charities, universities and libraries in his last few years.
The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.
Andrew Carnegie was one of the most famous and wealthiest American industrialist during the Industrial Age. He was a robber baron who made a fortune in the steel industry and applied vertical integration to his business. Carnegie contradicted his views as a robber baron because he supported, but destroyed many unions. This made many of his views unethical.
Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.
Was Andrew Carnegie a thief and a cheat, or a giving philanthropist? Andrew Carnegie was a man who started from the bottom in a poor household. He sailed and settled in america and grew up to rise through the ranks in the job he had gotten, seeming like he would be a leader in the railroad industry he was known across the country, in 1872 he met Henry Bessemer who thought of the Bessemer process for making steel 20 years before. They shared ideas and with this process Carnegie became rich, but Carnegie shared his money donating to libraries and many other places, but these donations came out of workers wages. In 1900 Carnegie sold his steel company and continued his life donating and funding important organizations for education.