There are multiple examples of major changes in Africa that I could talk about for this exam. But being that I only need a few pages, I will focus on, for this exam, rise and end of the Malinke Empire and Songhay, the religious influences throughout Ethiopia, trading towns in the east of Africa, and most of the Iron Age societies. The examples of change will display how towns and kingdoms would come and go, the people settling there, or development of new productions and technology. I will then explain if the examples were of benefit or not to Africa’s continents for years to come. The Almoravids unification of the Saharan Berber opened new sources of gold trade, causing Ghana to lose its control over the trade. Ghana’s loss of domination of the trade causes the Malinke Empire to begin to rise. …show more content…
The Zagwe dynasty was the main reason for Ethiopia’s Christian existence. The Zagwe kings replaced the traditional rulers with Christian military leaders, or royal family members. The rulers reopened the connects with the Holy Land of Palestine and the Jerusalem of the old Testament. Therefore, the Ethiopians began missionaries down the Nile and east of Jerusalem. About 1270, the Zagwe dynasty was over and the Solomonid dynasty was up and coming. What was different from lineage of rulership was the Solomonid kings claimed to have descended from the biblical King Solomon and Queen Sheba. The rise of the Solomonids ceased the traditional architectural buildings. The King and officials would live in tents going from district to district. This allowed the king to uphold his loyalty and ensure taxation. One tradition that stuck for about 3 centuries was when a new king was throne, all the royal officials were imprisoned in the mountain fortress of Gishen. The Solomonids hoped to make all of Ethiopia Christian, but the Muslim sultanates had conflict with
The war lasted from 1095 bc to 1204 bc. Two religions fight for land, money and power. This leaves two questions to people. Why did these religions hate each other so much? They hated each other so much because of their difference of religion and gods.
1. S: - began colonies through uncharted companies and colonized to spread Christianity - used religion and economic terms to justify their takeover - traded with local natives D: - Spanish and Dutch emphasized conquest - Spanish and French used religion to colonize natives - French held a fur trading post with natives The Dutch: - became commercial/financial hub for a fur trading enterprise New World: - English and Spanish created settlers colonies 2 . Was united to create peace between the tribes and by following The Great Law of Peace, they ended the wars (909 CE).
Even in, European countries during this era, the “Scramble for Africa” where the Europeans were fighting for leadership in African
The two historical terms that I choose from Chapter 18 are The Educated Elite and The Missionary Factor. The Educated Elite was a group or class of persons considered to be superior to others because of their intelligence, social standing, or wealth. Throughout the Afro-Asian world of the 19th century, the European presence generated a small group of people who enthusiastically embraced the culture and lifestyle of Europe.
Not only did the Trans-Saharan trade routes bring commodities such as gold and salt but the Islamic religion as well. Before the Islam reached Sub-Saharan West Africa, Animism was the main religion of Sub-Saharan West Africa. Animism is the belief in numeral spiritual beings that are concerned with human affairs and that they are capable for either helping or harming human instincts. Additionally, kin played a crucial role in early Sub-Saharan societies since who you were related to directly influenced your role in your society. The Islamic empire conquered parts of North Africa which helped spread the influence and wealth of Islam.
The imperial mission and mindset of European’s drastically changed the course of history. Driven by their lust for money and power, the Europeans ransacked the lands of the Natives of America and devastated the people of Africa. At their encounter with these foreign bodies, to which they declared were less than their white, Christian selves, the Europeans saw nothing but economic opportunity in these lands. In the Americas, Natives were disregarded and killed, and their land stripped of all the bountiful resources it once provided. In Africa, the people were taken as slaves and treated with less respect than garbage.
In another analysis of this debate between good and bad imperialism, it is claimed that Africa gained a “Technical advance--a significant technical advance in the modern period has been, quite simply, the introduction of new crops to many African regions. Other technical advances have included agricultural techniques, improved transportation and communication, etc. Most modern technical advance seems to have resulted from diffusion to Africa of innovations made elsewhere, rather than from research and development in Africa led, for instance, by colonial governments” (Manning). The European and Western businesses also brought more commerce to Africa, “European firms and governments invested in such enterprises as railroads and ports in Africa. The investment brought wages to workers, and better transport brought better prices to African producers and consumers” (Manning).
Kingdoms were at a time of high with great prosperity and new high political and military heights. During a time of idolatry and a time of immorality, these time periods reflected a time of greed, persecution of the poor, etc. While Jeroboam had a successful reign, Israel seems to be at its zenith of power. Israel was at a time of being politically secure but overall Amos was at a time of economic prosperity.
The primary difference in the political organization of both East and West African from 1000-1500 CE comes in the form of government. While all sub-Saharan Africa utilized kin-based groups, West Africa was structured more around kingdoms, and East Africa structured around city-states. Some West African kingdoms had a strong centralized government, such as the Kingdom of Kongo. The government included a king, who controlled military, judicial, and financial affairs, with the help of his officials. When the emergence of formal states came about, the strong kin-based societies of the West survived for centuries later.
Their king, called the Ghana, put a heavy tax on both slat and gold. This wealth led Ghana to become a well-established empire. In Document 3, the Arabs who wanted gold and the
Comparison Analysis Essay Swahili coast and great zimbabwe were two african kingdoms that are very significant in african history. These kingdoms started from little to nothing and advanced over many centuries. swahili coast and great zimbabwe were once extremely powerful and wealthy kingdoms with many resources to use and flourishing populations. Slowly over many centuries these kingdoms come to a downfall; environmental instability, natural disasters, trade resources running out, or at times battles and wars were the causes of a kingdom's collapse.
In the same region that the Ghana empire once existed, a new empire came to power. In the 1230s, the Malinke people took control of the trade routes in West Africa. King Sundiata conquered and united several smaller kingdoms to form Mali, extending their territory to the Atlantic Ocean. A relative of Sundiata named Mansa Musa took control in 1307.
With all the people in Mali it lead to many things, good and bad. There were three medieval kingdoms in West Africa, one of them was Ghana. In the 400s the Ghana empire was in existence as Arab merchants traveled to trade. Trading was not what created the Ghana empire, but it definitely made them richer. Another thing that made them richer was charging to protect the gold from neighboring networks.
Eventually the christians won those battles and gained lots of power from
Israel under King Solomon According to the Bible, Israel insisted that they should have a king “like all other nations” (1 Samuel 8:5, New International Version). Through a succession of rulers, Saul and David, Israel’s territories were challenged by the Philistines that caused the northern and southern tribes to unite as one kingdom. Since David was able to defeat the Philistines, the Hebrew empire grew and at David’s death, he was able to give Solomon a thriving kingdom.