Eduardo Mendieta constructs an adequate response to Angela Davis’ Are Prisons Obsolete? in his article, The Prison Contract and Surplus Punishment: On Angela Y. Davis’ Abolitionism. While Mendieta discusses the pioneering abolitionist efforts of Angela Davis, the author begins to analyze Davis’ anti-prison narrative, ultimately agreeing with Davis’ polarizing stance. Due to the fact Mendieta is so quick to begin analyzing Davis’ work, the article’s author inadvertently makes several assumptions about readers of his piece. For instance, Mendieta assumes that readers will automatically be familiar with Angela Davis. After arguing the failure of prisons, Mendieta establishes his agreement with Davis’ anti-prison rhetoric without introducing the author, her book, or other various abolitionist efforts, “I will also argue that Davis’s work is perhaps one of the best philosophical as well as political responses to the expansion of the prison system...” (Mendieta 293). The article’s author also assumes that readers are familiar with specific torture tactics used on prisoners,“...the United States is facing one of its most devastating moral and political debacles in its history with the disclosures of torture at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and other such prisons…” (293). Mendieta’s act of assuming that readers will already be familiar with Angela Davis and her work, as well as the specific methods of torture used by certain prisons, may cause readers to feel lost while reading the
Part Three of Angela Davis: An Autobiography describes Davis’ foreign travels as a young adult and their influence on her changing political and social views. Davis recounts her time in Paris as an American, where even in the embassy after Kennedy’s assassination she states, “Nevertheless, I felt out of place at the Embassy, surrounded by crowds of ‘Americans in Paris’ and it was difficult to identify with their weeping” (Davis 132). Even early on in her travels, Davis already identified the feelings of antipathy that she felt for other Americans whilst exploring her own path of communism, and even her connections with Vietnamese hatred for Americans, when in the Vietnamese Tet Celebration, “the brutal realities of their experiences by the
First, I want to examine a particularly critical review of Alexander’s text by Joseph D. Osel. According to Joseph D. Osel’s, “while Alexander’s book claims to be concerned with exposing and describing the history and mechanisms of mass incarceration of the American ‘caste system,’ which affect the poor and people of color systematically and disproportionately, her work systematically, strangely, and empathically excludes these voices” (OSEL Whitewash). Osel goes on to contend that Alexander’s work provides the history of criminal justice and imprisonment with a “vast rhetorical and historical facelift where the most relevant and affected voices on the topic at hand are safely expunged from the discussion, from relevance, from history” (OSEL
Over the last thirty years, the prison population in the United States has increased more than seven-fold to over two million people, including vastly disproportionate numbers of minorities and people with little education. For some racial and educational groups, incarceration has become a depressingly regular experience, and prison culture and influence pervade their communities. Almost 60 percent of black male high school drop-outs in their early thirties have spent time in prison. In Punishment and Inequality in America, sociologist Bruce Western explores the recent era of mass incarceration and the serious social and economic consequences it has wrought.
Angela Davis’ book Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture provides her critique on how today’s democracy is continually weakened by structures of oppression, such as slavery, reconstruction, and lynching. By utilizing her own experience and employing views from historical figures like Frederick Douglass and W.E.B. Dubois, Davis examines the chain of racism, sexism, and political oppression. She speaks of the hidden moral and ethical issues that bring difference within people’s social situations. In the “Abolition Democracy” chapter, she describes the relationship between the production of law and violation of law demonstrated in the United States.
Cynthia Keo 12/22/2022 Room 303 Slavery; Is it flawed? ELA “You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know.” ―
The legal system has played a significant role in perpetuating systematic oppression or control over marginalized group, such as Native people and Black people. Literary works such as Benito Cereno and Zong! exposes the limitations of the legal framework in recognizing, addressing, and acknowledging the brutality, oppression, and murder faced by Black people. The use of law in these works illustrates how enslaved Black people were dehumanized and oppressed “legally” due to the law. Even today, as M.NourbeSe Philip argues in “Defending the Dead,” Black people are often outside the law (and yet trapped by it) in the way the law is used to police and confine black bodies in the new prison industrial complex.
Does it make sense to lock up 2.4 million people on any given day, giving the U.S the highest incarceration rate in the world. More people are going to jail, this implies that people are taken to prison everyday for many facilities and many go for no reason. People go to jail and get treated the worst way as possible. This is a reason why the prison system needs to be changed. Inmates need to be treated better.
Transcendentalists were Americans that believed everyone should be treated equally, so they began six major reform movements. There were many Transcendentalist movements, but the six most important reforms were the prison movement, women’s rights, anti-slavery, temperance, insane and education movement. The prison reform movement was started by the Transcendentalists because they felt that the system was wrong unfair and cruel. All prisoners suffered the same consequences regardless of his or her crime.
It pains me to say that I will not have the satisfaction of giving each and every one of those people who escaped or not the credit and appraisal that they so dutifully deserve. No, in this essay I will be focusing on three people, each with their own hardships and their own “imprisonments”, whether those “imprisonments” were literal or not; they deserve to be appraised. All three of these people contrast against each other greatly but, at the same time have immense comparisons. For example, all three of these people are minorities but, only two of them are male.
The “13th” is a documentary about the American system of incarceration and the economic forces behind racism in America especially in people of color. One of the claims that the author mentioned is that today incarceration is an extension of slavery. It is also mentioned that most of the time in society we are defined by race. In the documentary, we can see how African Americans are sentenced for many years since they are too poor to pay their fines or sometimes most of these people plead guilty to get out of jail fast. However, African Americans are separated from their families and also treated inhumanly in prisons just because they are of a particular race.
Her central thesis is that mass incarceration is “The New Jim Crow,” or the new system of control used by the government to uphold racial class in the U.S. This book will be helpful to my research because it directly discusses the topic of race and the criminal justice system. Amnesty International. (2003). United States of America: Death by discrimination
This preconceived notion could not be farther from the truth. In reality, these reform movements are idiotically placing a bandaid over the tremendous issue that the prison system is. An imbalance of reforms between women and men, unrestrained sexual abuse in women’s prisons, and tyrannical gender roles are just three of countless examples of how prison reform movements only create more misfortune and fail to provide any real solution to worsening prison conditions. Perhaps instead of conjuring up additional ideas on how to reform prisons, America’s so-called democratic society should agree upon abolishing prisons as a whole. This being said, it is crucial to identify ongoing issues in today’s society, understand how they contribute to unlawful behavior, and seek a solution.
The term "Prison Industrial Complex" (PIC) is used to express the rapid expansion of the United States inmate population. The prison industrial complex (PIC) is an expression used to describe the connection between the interests of government and industry that use surveillance, policing, and imprisonment the resolution to economic, social and political problems. The P.I.C helps to maintain the authority of people who get their power through racial, economic, social and other privileges. Power is collected and maintained through the PIC in many ways, including creating mass media images that reinforce the stereotypes associated with people of color, less fortunate people, homosexual people, immigrants, youth, elderly and other oppressed communities. These stereotypes imply that those who are associated with these groups of society are criminals, corrupt, delinquent, deviant, etc.
While such transformations of people behind bars can leave a permanent mark such events and daily invasion of privacy contribute to these permanent changes as described in his poem, Its Going To Be A Cold Winter, “They enter my cell: a legal pillow fight begins with my books and papers. Stir crazy madmen, papers sidling down to the cement floor, my mattress turned over, sheets torn away like a mask hiding tons of heroin; but nothing, only cotton, cheap sweaty moldy-smelling cotton, picked by slaves, sewed up by slaves, slaves of the Greater State, that come in all colors.” (Baca, p.6) He amply provides the reader a clear understanding of this loss of privacy and the random acts of invasion, as he is left unable to say anything about these activities by the guards. Baca continues to distinguish the role of forced slavery in its modern form in prisons while subtly indicating the role of racialized discrimination.
“Corrections” some says that the destinations of America's criminal equity framework, completely, are the same as the targets of other organization: it endeavors to sustain itself. Instead of seeking after equity, the jail framework characterizes accomplishment with feelings and absolution. New detainees swindle themselves when they expect equity and decency. Regardless of having manufactured fruitful professions as refined specialists, huge numbers of the men in America's government jail camps strike me as being unimaginably gullible when it came to exploring their way through the convoluted halls of alleged equity. Decades ago, the notable German savant Max Weber composed broadly about hierarchical frameworks and structures.