There is a controversial and intimidating proposal that looms over the heads of not only the many inhabitants of the northwestern area of Minnesota, but as well as the entirety of the state. Polymet wishes to invest a large chunk of money into the construction of a sulfide mine. Upon first consideration, this seems like a fantastic idea. As it would provide jobs, give Minnesota new opportunities, and boost the economy of the towns and cities surrounding the mine site. However, when digging deeper, it is easily said that the negative effects outweigh the positive ones. Likewise, There seems to be a higher number of negative effects this proposal would have then is does positives. A small number of these include; a loss of ecosystem, a decline in tourism, environment and water pollution, and …show more content…
This list goes on, and it is breath-taking. There are many reasons why the citizens of Minnesota must stand up against Polymet's proposal, and reclaim our priceless home back to ourselves. In further detail, Polymet Corporation is based out of Canada. It is a so-called world class manufacturer of high performance welding, hard facing, and thermal spray wires. Notice this list does not include mining of any sort. In fact, they have never operated a mine of their own before. This corporation has the desire to invest a large amount of money into a sulfide mine. It would be located near the pristine area of Babbitt and the Hoyt Lakes area. The mine itself would be situated atop 6,650 acres of land that is currently owned by the Superior National Forest. This allotted amount of land would allow Polymet to give rise to a mine
The Time article “A High-Plains Showdown Over the Dakota Access Pipeline” by Justin Worland talks about a controversy over a 1,200-mile pipeline stretching from North Dakota to Illinois. The pipeline is called the Dakota Access Pipeline project and is being built by the Energy Transfer Partners company. Some people are outraged by the pipeline because it contributes to man-made climate change. Others are mainly outraged because the Standing Rock Sioux tribe never agreed to the construction of the pipeline. The leaders of the tribe say that “Washington never considered their concerns, as required by the federal law” (Worland).
Now, over looking the positives, there were many huge problems or negatives going on. All those sandy soils mentioned
But these people are still knowledgeable on this issue but support the builders of the pipeline. Some people may look at the pipeline project and wonder where there can be any positives, but the people in favor see the number of jobs created and the amount of money profited by it as a superior outcome. These economic benefits include adding around “$156 million in sales and income taxes to state and local governments as well as add 8,000 to 12,000 construction jobs” (Park). With regard to the money raised by taxes for the government, this may be a positive in the economy of the states but not in the economy of the people. Illinois, being the states that the pipeline route ends in, will also be heavily taxed by this project.
Unlike the Everglades, Sydney Olympic Park Wetlands, have massive developments built in the area. This is a positive long-term impact as it will attract more tourism to the area, positively increasing the wetlands reputation. However, this does have a downside to it. The increase of urbanisation means more developments and infrastructure which may demolish the Sydney Olympic Park wetland. There is also a chance that the pollution may not stop.
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a underground oil pipeline. Part of the pipeline is on Native American territory. To get access to the pipeline, burial grounds of the Natives Americans would have to be annihilated, going against the tradition of Native American culture. In the article,”
The sententious construction of the pipeline will help…”create thousands of jobs”(DAPL:top pros and cons). By implying more jobs, it allows many people to have the opportunity to have a workplace in which they can earn the money to pay off and bills presented. Even if the pipeline can produce more jobs, but the pipeline would not cause any major incidents. Once the Dakota Access Pipeline is bonded into place, workers wondered if there, shall be a decrease in ant incidents than other major pipeline that recently resulted in spillages. The DAPL both pros and cons, states that there is a new way of “oil freight ages…to major refining markets in a more productive way towards the environment.”
The U.S. government helped the mine owners by using policemen and the army to stop the workers’ rebellion, which was interfering with the capitalist social order and undermining the profitability of the mines. Background The period
“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,
This is what the industry was like at its best in the late 1800’s. The state the of Minnesota had a very large supply of iron ore. Because of his company more people started to move in too Minnesota. Since his company started getting bigger and bigger it gave more people jobs. This is what the industry is like today.
TAPS transports 17% of the United State’s domestic petroleum. If the pipeline were to stop, “A loss of that production would increase prices by at least 10 to 16 percent” (Balan). This is very important, as the majority of the American population is in constant need of these resources. A shift this dramatic in the economy would lead to outrage and possible changes in economic inflation. All in all, the Trans Alaska pipeline has provided for a great number of people and has not failed to let them down.
Public Policy on Housing Discrimination Executive Summary Housing discrimination and segregation have long been present in the American society (Lamb and Wilk). The ideals of public housing and home buying have always been intertwined with the social and political transformation of America, especially in terms of segregation and inequality of capital and race (Wyly, Ponder and Nettking). Nevertheless, the recent unrest in Ferguson, Missouri and in Baltimore due to alleged police misconduct resulting to deaths of black men brought light on the impoverished conditions in urban counties in America (Lemons). This brings questions to the effectiveness of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in devising more fair-housing facilities (Jost).
Area of Conflict Homelessness can be understood in the perspective of conflict theory, which holds that capitalism is one the main reason for homelessness. “Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned” (Ayn Rand). There are many reasons why a person becomes homeless, an increasing number become homeless each year, with up to 5,000 people becoming homeless every year. Generally the experiences that lead to homelessness are determined by poverty and structural inequality.
These explanations are persuasive in their own right, but ecologists have increased some additional to deal with, like what would be the resultant of alteration of biodiversity on ecosystem properties, such as productivity, carbon storage, hydrology, and nutrient cycling? The apparent follow-up problem is what are the resultant of resemble largely anthropogenic alteration in biodiversity on the goods and services that ecosystems give to humans? If altered biodiversity affects ecosystem lot, is there a point at which changes in the lot might have a negative influence in human welfare? That is, those problems that being answered step by step by our own biodiversity, climate change, ozone layer begins to release the air or gas, and
And one of the old solutions for this concern is to increase number of cultivation lands and exploit new fish stocks. But the competition for land from other human activities makes this an increasingly unlikely and costly solution .for example food producers are experiencing grater rivalry for land, water energy and the need to curb the many negative effects of food production on the environment becoming increasingly clear (Tilman et al. ,2001;
These assessments are often poor. Alternatives put forward tend to be unrealistic in order to favour the option the applicant wants to implement. The regulations also require the applicant to illustrate the need and desirability of the project, which is often not done (Hutton and Tefford, 2003). Impact mitigation Insufficient information provided on recommended mitigation measures; little indication of the practicality, reliability and potential effectiveness of the mitigation measures and problems with measures which are recommended that don’t address identified impacts.