Flowers for Algernon Argumentative essay Intelligence is a valued aspect to many people, but it can be achieved in options that aren’t labeled “intelligence-altering surgery”. The doctors, Dr.Nemur and Dr. Strauss do not follow the ethics of fieldwork. They chose the wrong person, Charlie Gordon, to do the surgery on, and didn’t wait to find out that the side-effects include death. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, the doctors made a bad choice by choosing Charlie Gordon for the intelligence-altering surgery. The first and least important reason is that Dr.Nemur and Dr.Strauss did not follow the ethics of fieldwork. Dr.Strauss spells it out for himself, “reassuring” Charlie about the surgery, “Dr. Strauss says don’t be supersitis …show more content…
Charlie Gordon starts to catch on to the symptoms of his operation and knowing that included on the list is death. He begins to catch on after Algernon dies, stating “I have become absent minded. Algernon died two days ago.” (Keyes) Charlie now understands that this will soon become his reality, too. Once something that had been a fantasy and only a dream, now turned into a nightmare, haunting Charlie, mentally exhausting him. “I’ve given up using the typewriter completely. My coordination is bad. I feel that I’m moving slower and slower. Had a terrible shock today.” (Keyes 206) Charlie now is completely certain that he will die, seeing all side-effects and the bad side of the operation. Last, the doctors were not supposed to harm him, even though that they probably knew about the outcome of the surgery, written in the Belmont Report, states “Two general rules have been formulated as complementary expressions of beneficent actions in this sense: 1. Do not harm and 2. Maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms.” (The Belmont Report 28) Doctors Nemur and Strauss do not follow these written expectations, and possible harms are not
They failed Algernon by causing him death. They failed Charlie by not keeping his intelligent that he got him his surgery. Charlie was treated as Algernon. Algernon was a mouse, and Charlie is a human being,
Charlie then reviewed Algernon’s charts on June 5th and noticed he was regressing. The passage states that on June 5th, Algernon died two days ago on June 8th. After he died, Charlie dissected him and discovered his brain decreased in weight, just as he assumed. Charles knew that his intelligence will deteriorate similar to Algernon. As Algernon regressed and died, hatred has shown toward Charlie from his coworkers.
In Daniel Keyes’s “Flowers for Algernon” , Charlie Gordon should have had the operation. To begin, this operation was a good idea because he gets a chance to contribute to science. He “feels that [the Algernon-Gordon Effect] is an important discovery.” Evidently, Charlie wants to prevent people from suffering the side effects of the operation before he does Charlie’s decision to have the operation guides him to accept himself after losing his gained knowledge.
”(Skloot, 2010, p. 50). Racism has since been abolished and is now considered discrimination; also it is illegal to do any medical procedure on uninformed patients. However in today’s society like the era before, everyone has their own opinion and although it is legally and socially unethical people can still be bias. Also the patients in the studies did not have informed consent. There are three things in which you need to have informed consent; knowing, voluntary and competency.(10/17/13)
Every second of everyday people go through surgeries which sometimes end up in unpredicted symptoms. ”Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes is about a 37 year old man, named Charlie Gordon who has a mental disability. When taking a part of an operation/experiment to gradually escalate. Before Charlie had the IQ of 68 but with help of the surgery, he gains the capacity to see the world how it really is. Charlie was better off when he took the surgery because he now has the knowledge to see how people are when it comes to somebody who is different that they are.
The results of the study showed that about half of the subjects were willing to keep going until the doctor told them to stop, while the other half refused to go on with the test once they thought they were harming another person. Some have taken his methods to have been unethical, and not worth any physiological damage that may have been done to the subject. It is arguable that he blurred the line on the APA’s guidelines of ethical principle on consent, and deception, but in my mind it was justifiable, and required in order to gather untainted information.
Petrina Arvanitakis Putman Hour 2-4 15 November 2016 Argument Essay Ethics are the acts, behaviors, or motives and if they are 'right or wrong '. In 'flowers for Algernon ' Charlie Gordon is a man who is disabled from low intelligence. Unfortunately, his doctors were not ethical when performing the procedure to make him smarter. Algernon was a small mouse that what a friend of Charlie 's, and he died in the procedure.
“Flowers for Algernon” Persuasive Essay Did you know that 2% of the world population has a low I.Q. of 68 or less? If you got the chance to improve your I.Q. would you? Charlie Gordon got that chance! In the sci-fi story, “Flowers for Algernon” Charlie Gordon is a mentally challenged man, with a low I.Q. of 68.
Flowers for Algernon is a novel by Daniel Keyes exploring the life of Charlie Gordon. He was born with a abnormally low IQ, but then he has been chosen for an experimental surgery. The surgery is supposed to raise his IQ greatly, just as it worked on a mouse named Algernon. Throughout the book, Charlie goes through life with his ups and downs, with an unexpected ending. Further, the surgery performed on Charlie Gordon could be considered ethical or not.
This passage is talking about how scientists took innocent people and used them as their experiment testers without their knowledge as well as lying to them about what they were actually doing. Being in charge of medical procedures that are being done on hundreds of people is an important role to be, that being said, you should take care of your patients and give them the best possible treatments they can be provided
Soon after a couple months the surgery wares off and Charlie Gordon is “Non-Intelligent” again. Yet there is a downside of it. Charlie’s IQ goes even lower than 68 now. Which means the “Artificial Intelligence” (A.I) surgery is a failure and Charlie regresses even
They should of cared more for Charlie and not as much on themselves. The doctors were focused on getting famous and money and instead should of focused on studying on Charlie and thinking about what ifs. Another question they should of asked themselves was who was in charge? In the story you never see who is really in charge they are always fighting about Charlie and never focus on what 's really going on. Although some may agree others may disagree about the doctors being ethical.
The choice of using Charlie Gordon in Daniel Keyes’ book, Flowers for Algernon, for an intelligence altering surgery was unethical and biased. The first reason that Charlie should not have been chosen for the surgery is that it left him and his life in worse condition than when before the surgery. “ I dont want Miss Kinnian to feel sorry for me. Evry body feels sorry at the factery and I dont want that eather
Flowers for Algernon explores themes of ethical dilemmas in scientific research. Charlie Gordon is the first human to undergo an experimental operation to triple his IQ from 68 to 204. His mental capacities dramatically increase, but the consequences are drastic when the operation fails and he regresses. Under Charlie’s circumstances, the operation was unethical. Charlie, mentally disabled, cannot give informed consent.
Camille is turning twenty-five soon and he knows he has to sterilize her. The idea doesn’t cause him any concern, he supports the whole idea of Z-town to have babies built instead of conceived because at the end of the day, the less people, the more resources are available to them. Tobias is incredibly selfish in that sense, he pours greed and lives to be the best doctor in Z-town, he has already been recognized for being the best sterilizer, his patient's chances of having a baby are now almost non-existent, unlike any other. Not to mention the fact that since his career started at the age of twenty, he hasn’t had any patient who’s needed to have an abortion. All other doctors have, he’s just simply the best at what he