In the 19th century, British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli stated, “A man who is not a liberal at 16 has no heart; a man who is not a conservative at 60 has no head.”. Ordinarily, we always regarded grandparents as ideologically more conservative than the younger generation, especially since the birth of the millennial generation (1981-1997). It’s not a new phenomenon. This happened all around the world, especially stronger in developed countries. Each of us may have our own opinion about this ideological evolution. But, is this kind of stereotype true and existed? Well, let’s put this question on a clear perspective, factually and realistically. From a psychological perspective, this could be true. Based on literally hundreds of psychological statistics, there are three main reasons why grandparents are ideologically more conservative than the younger generation. Firstly, grandparents have a lower level of intellectual curiosity and openness to experience. Secondly, grandparents are slower to process information, so they rely more on their experience and abilities. Lastly, grandparents liked familiarity and predictability more than the younger generation. So, they wanted to keep society as they knew it, and not to change it. …show more content…
Raise your hand if you know him! His name is Anthony Neil Wedgwood Benn, famously known as Tony Benn. Born in 1925 from a British Establishment family, his father was Viscount Stansgate. But, instead becoming a conservative, he embraced British Socialism. The Levellers, Keir Hardie, and Karl Marx inspired him. Then, in 1950, he joined the Labour Party accordingly, and becoming more radical ever since. As he grew with age, he became more radical, instead of conservative. In 6 decades of his political career, this radicalism was best expressed in his speech, when The House of Commons was voting on a crucial motion about Iraq War. Let’s watch it
Before I could even understand what politics was, I would hear my parents and extended family discussing conservatism and their opinions on our country’s leaders. For a while, I identified as a conservative strictly because of what my parent’s told me.
My grandmother never knew her grandparents. They had all passed before she ever got the opportunity to meet them and converse about their family’s history. She regrets not getting to see her grandparents and says that that is the reason she tries to be the best grandmother she can
In Crito, a play by Plato, Socrates and Crito deliberate about the justifications of breaking out of prison. Crito provides numerous evidences that should appeal to Socrates emotional side by bringing up his friends and family, however, Socrates maintains his composure. Instead he contributes a logical and concise argument to act justly by staying in prison and accepts his punishment for ‘corrupting the youth’, among other things. I believe that Socrates argument is most effective due to his content, which is filled with logic and reasoning to prove his premises, as well as his style; not filled with flare and insignificant common phrases. Socrates most effective strategy is his use of logos, he always uses rationale and logic to decide his next point or explain his most recent assertion.
Ellen Goodman, in her article “The Granny Voters, Getting out the Vote” (September 11, 2014), implies that nowadays, politicians attempt to gain favoritism from senior citizens by suggesting stereotypical ideas regarding their future, rather than their grandchildren’s. Goodman develops her point by heavily using pathos to highlight the value of children while asserting sarcastic remarks. Her purpose is to promote the message behind her newly formed group, “GrannyVoter”, in order to influence grandparents to publicly speak out their values beside “social security, prescription drugs, and medicine” and the changes they truly want to see. Goodman formulates an informal relationship with her audience of grandparents who are not pleased with the
the comparison is often made between modern Republicans and 1950s democrats; news anchors, political figures, and many Americans often compare the views of 1950s democrats to the views of modern Republicans. Political views change drastically year by year and the views of political parties have been known to flip. The conclusion can be made that 1950s Democrats and modern Republicans do share some similarities in political views, but usually differ on the way a situation should be handled or funded. Democrats have always been supporters of government supported social programs since the early 1900s, even more so as the years go on As the twentieth century progressed, Democrats increasingly supported social programs that sought to aid struggling
New Conservatism DBQ Beginning with John F. Kennedy in 1961 and ending with the Reagan Administration in 1989, the United States was headed by believers of a new conservatism throughout these three decades. These conservative leaders returned the country to the moral roots of its founding and prosperity following years of economic downturn, civil frustration, and foreign and domestic struggles for the nation as a whole. A new type of leader was desired for by the American people, and one emerged with the new conservatism of the late 1900s. As citizens wanted to grow and improve, they felt subject to a government that was limiting their opportunity to do so, resulting in dissatisfaction with the leaders of the nation.
Baby boomers are the demographic cohort, known as the generation that makes up the substantial portion of the world’s population. Individuals born during the time of 1946 to 1964 has lived in environments where smoking lead to a detrimental impact in their later years. As the third leading cause of death, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common among the older population. This disease is the leading cause of both morbidity and mortality. Leading to a consensus that older adults (particularly baby boomers) are at a great risk of COPD because they grew up in an era where smoking was fashionable, cigarettes were provided during the wars, and exposure to secondhand smoke was tremendous.
Summarize the central argument: Through a series of in-depth interviews Irene Bolemraad gathers enough information to argue that the process in which immigrant families decide to participate in protests (such as the 2006 immigrant right rallies) could be reversed in a way where the younger members of the household are the ones to influence the parents to mobilize. Bolemraad is able to conclude this by a model called bidirectional political socialization that demonstrate through intergenerational communication and interactions that it’s possible to influence family members to become politically engaged. Participation increases when information is gathered from these sources as well as other networks such as schools, churches work places, and
My parents rarely ever questioned the childcare being given to me, and this promoted both sets of grandparents
We can all learn a thing a two from our elders and can never stop learning. We are all grateful for the sacrifices my father and his father made. Children are treated very strictly by their parents. But aunts and uncles are much nicer to their nephews and nieces. I remember I was not allowed to hang out with certain kids if my mom saw them as the trouble maker types.
They often follow or believe in what their great grandparents believed. The identity of person comes from the people pasts, which shapes their unique
Scott Fitzgerald explains how he doesn’t believe that our elders are so much more knowledgeable than us and how marriage sours quickly (He really gets into many different topics). Elders were more than willing to share experiences with younger people but they really don’t want to hear a reaction to their experience. Fitzgerald explains how “They always talk about their experiences but they go on making the same mistakes at 50” (5). A perfect example of this is Troy in Fences. Troy probably left his family in shambles due to his stint in prison but he worked hard to obtained stable job after he finished his sentence.
With every new generation of teenagers or young adults, there always seems to be this negative look towards the youth culture. What really strikes me is that it happens with every new generation. It seems like once a person hits their teenage years they suddenly become “rebels” of society, and for what reason? How do most adults see the younger generation? They are young people who have bad manners, no respect for the elderly, they are real tyrants, they do not stand up when elders walk in, they do not listen to their parents or teachers, they talk in the presence of adults, and they eat gluttonously (Socrates).
Mark Bauerlein, author of ‘The Dumbest Generation’, argues that today’s youth has had a decline in academics due to new technology in today’s economy. In retrospect, we’re growing up in a different time than the generation before us; the world and it’s products are different as to be expected, and with them we must learn new materials than they did. Today’s generation isn’t ‘dumb’, instead we’re adjusting to the times and retaining different knowledge than the generations before us. Many older generations always thinks that the generation after theirs is ‘dumber’, and think themselves to be the superior one.
Many children adopt the views of their parents as parents often communicate the values and beliefs that are important to them onto their children. According to our textbook, families beliefs and opinions may be influenced by race, social class, educational environment, and religious beliefs. Education is another place where political socialization may occur. Many