Many countries independently have a sufficient amount of nuclear bombs and missiles to end the entire human race on planet earth. The cold war began the race for countries to have large nuclear arsenals that has been going non stop. Nuclear weapons are largely for show, the only nuclear weapons ever used in combat were dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki, which was 71 years ago (Mian). Countries should not have nuclear weapons
In addition nuclear weapons are extremely expensive, in 2014 the U.S. alone spent $26 million on nuclear weapons disarmament (Alvarez). Nuclear weapons are showed to be expensive and are almost never used for the sole reason they were created. Instead nuclear weapons are used to demonstrate power by size of a country 's arsenal (Mian). All current nuclear bombs age older and older, costing their country who is maintaining them very large sums of money, until, finally they are disarmed which
…show more content…
(Alvarez). It is dangerous as well, anyone working around nuclear weapons could set a nuclear weapon off, or long term effects such as cancer from the nuclear weapons if the substance used to make nuclear weapons is not properly stored or maintained. This danger makes any job concerning nuclear weapons have a very high salary that costs the U.S. even more money. Most nuclear weapons are never used outside of testing, how ever there were two, (the only two ever used in combat) the nuclear bombs dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki. Is the fact that nuclear bombs are not ever used a bad thing from a civilian point of view? Maybe not, a nuclear bomb if deployed in a strategically correct location could kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and make the land unlivable for hundreds of years (Smetana). The world is spending billions on weapons that could kill hundreds of thousands of people, but never is actually deployed into
Clearly this is no longer an issue however do they have any value in today’s world? The week claims “Nuclear weapons have guaranteed our security for generations. They remain the ultimate deterrent to any aggressor, and the best means of ensuring peace.” It’s easy to agree with the
“It is perfectly obvious that when nations compete to increase their military might, the danger of war becomes greater, not lesser” (Doc. 5). This quote was said by Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev during the Cold War. Much of the Cold War resulted from the United States and the Soviet Union competing to build a nuclear bomb, which is what Khrushchev is referring to. However, to understand the Cold War, it is important to first understand what it was in definitive terms. The Cold War was a forty five year long struggle between the United States and Union, the world’s superpowers of the time.
Daisaku Ikeda said “Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot exist.” The United States ended World War II by bombing Japan which caused radiation damage and devastation to all of Japan. The United States had three main reasons why they dropped the atomic bomb in such a rush. They wanted to limit American casualties from fighting future battles. The United States wanted to establish dominance over the war before Russia could join in.
Nuclear Energy IS Australia’s Future Introduction: I wholeheartedly believe that Nuclear Energy will play an inevitably central role as a reliable energy source in Australia’s future. Australia must invest in Nuclear energy because coal and oil are becoming scarce, requires less fuel and is eco-friendly. Australia is blessed with the world’s largest known uranium resources (a bountiful 38% according to Professor Mary O’Kane NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer). ANSTO (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) reports: ‘No country of Australia’s economic size or larger is without nuclear power’.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.
Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own
Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.
Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the
Now, nuclear material is destructive in nature when used as a weapon, however, it can easily be used as a source of energy as to being nuclear energy. Another perspective is that it can be a dangerous bomb; “We have been able to harness this tremendous energy in a small bomb”. Yes it can be turned into a bomb but this as well can pose as an opportunity to make it into spaceship fuel as well as car fuel in the future. Einstein states that “if successful, radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibilities”. That statement is true if there is no regulation regarding nuclear uses therefore it is still possible to use safely.
There is only one moment in the Earth’s more than 4.5 billion years of existence that a nuclear weapon was utilized and it was during the Second World War by the US. We are the only known nation to mankind who have used this so-called weapon of mass destruction to another independent country. The effect was something that surprised even our scientists who invented it expected, totally obliterating the land, polluting the air, killing the people, and with its aftermaths bringing sickness to citizens who somehow survived, but latterly died in agony. With this knowledge, we say never, should this happen
One cannot deny that some nuclear waste is produced and that it is radioactive. However, according to the World Nuclear Association in many countries, nuclear waste accounts for just 1% of all toxic wastes. This means that only a small amount of waste is produced and it would be easy to contain. Furthermore, the BBC states that you are able to reprocess nuclear waste and reuse up to 97% of it. This means that waste can be reduced even further and that that supplies of Uranium can be sustained for longer.
Others say we need them to defend ourselves against nuclear attack if we get attacked. But, if no country had bombs to begin with we wouldn’t have to worry about nuclear
Nuclear bombs and missiles are extremely dangerous to both the target and the user. If a nuclear weapon were to go off while on a ship or in storage, the explosion of that weapon will trigger any nuclear weapons around it. This would cause a chain reaction that, depending on the weapons power and location, could destroy things from a warehouse to a small town (Kimball, "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What”). Also, the United States, our neighbor, has enough nuclear weapons to blow itself up roughly four times ("United States Has Enough”). That is over fifteen million square mile of land.
There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.