In Australia, refugees and asylum seekers are treated like the enemy in a war: the target of a highly resourced, military-led “deterrence” strategy complete with arbitrary detainment, detention camps, guards to terrorise them, forced deportations and the violent suppression of those who protest. Australia is failing to meet the standards required when regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. It is fact that asylum seekers make up less than 3% of Australia’s annual immigration yet the idea is being distorted to that of which they will overpopulate a country that prides itself on being a multicultural society. I want to shed light on the misconception that asylum seekers are not ‘legal’ when in actual fact it is a human right to seek freedom. …show more content…
Some of these people are on suicide watch yet we are turning a blind eye. They are protesting, having hunger strikes and stitching their mouths together to express that they are still there and they are still being mistreated. Still our government and media are ignoring their pleas for freedom.
I want to particularly focus right now on Manus Island which is now being treated as a military operation, Operation Sovereign Borders. People there have mutilated, starved, poisoned, harmed and have killed themselves from desperation. They have swallowed razor blades and set themselves on fire. They have died from medical neglect. Throughout this, our government ministers have remained callously and pathologically indifferent. They have ignored the advice of the highest medical and legal authorities we have here and overseas.
Our government claims that as humans we are innocent until proven guilty, however this is not the case as we are locking up these unfortunate people upon their arrival. Human rights commission released that what the government was doing is illegal. Our nation in response focused not on the mistreatment of these innocent beings but instead asked for the resignation of the human rights commissioner, Gillian Triggs for shedding the truth of what is really
‘The Tampa Decision: Examining the Australian Government’s prerogative power to detain and expel unlawful non-citizens in 2001’ The executive power of the Commonwealth has largely been neglected, both by the High Court and by commentators, receiving scant attention in comparison with the Commonwealth 's legislative and judicial powers. However, it was just fourteen years ago, in 2001, when a Norwegian cargo vessel MV Tampa being denied entry into Australia after rescuing 438 asylum seekers sparked one of the most controversial yet illuminating civil cases in Australian legal history. The result was a civil suit (Ruddock vs Vadarlis 2001) in which the Federal Government successfully appealed the initial ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, where it was found that the government does indeed possess a prerogative power to prevent the entry of non-citizens into
Firstly, under the United Nations refugee convention, asylum seekers are allowed to exercise their right and as Australia is a signatory of this convention they are allowed to seeK asylum in our country. but think of the amount of time, effort and money would be needed to complete this task. Yes we could be like Germany and give them a home but look what has happened. Just
Australia is the only country to have a system of mandatory detention where every single parent, man, woman, child who arrives here without a valid visa or illegal visa must undergo immigration detention immediately. The issue with the refugee treatment and mandatory detention in Australia is that their minds are so vulnerable and stressed after leaving their country. Detention can harm asylum seekers and refugees because they are indefinite meaning the government can detain people for the course of their life which has severe effects on a person’s emotions and wellbeing. Studies have shown that refugees who have come from a warfare filled country have and increased chance to undergo depression, self-harm and even attempt suicide when under a type of imprisonment such as immigration detention.
A fault in the Migration Act is that there is no set limit as to how long a person can be held in a detention (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2014). This is an obvious problem, as the average time that an asylum seeker or potential refugee is being held in detention is 350 days (as surveyed in June 2014), but over 150 people had been held in for over 2 years (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2015). Reports have shown that people who have been held in these detention centres for extended periods of time have developed mental and physical illnesses, which again proves that Australia is denying people protection of their human rights. If the seeker is found not to be a refugee, or to not be owed “complementary protection”, they are removed from Australia immediately (Australian Human Rights Commission,
Introduction Australia is said to be a multicultural and multiracial country. So why can’t we, as a country and as a nation, say yes to immigrants fleeing from a different country? As immigration to Australia is supposably apart of our history and it would be wrong not to continue on with the actions of our ancestors. Paragraph 1 As of 2014 – 2015, Australia accepted 13,750 refugees in total. Paragraph 2 • What are refugees and asylum seekers?
In the article “Amnesty report accuses Syria of executing thousands since war began” by Anne Barnard was about the Amnesty international report on the Saydnaya military prison. Which those reports were based on interviews from former detainees, prison employees, etc. That have accused the Syrian government of system antically executing after trials that just last some minutes. The Inmates have report that they were under conditions so dismal such as deprivation of food, water, medicine, and basic sanitation. Even those human rights groups know what was happening in Syria prison it was now documented.
Australia has been labelled as the country of mateship, fair-go and tolerance, but the mistreatment of Asylum seekers in Australia denies these values. In our anthem we sing “For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share”. It ironic isn’t it? As when Asylum seekers arrive in Australia we do not offer a hand of mateship instead we use punitive matters such as sending them to mandatory detention, which shows how xenophobia is manifested in Australia (Ariyawansa,
One of the issue that Australia is facing is asylum seekers traveling by boat and leaving their countries since their home countries due to war and terror to seek for a better life. Unfortunately that according to Australian Human rights commission that the Australian policy in 1992 that all non-citizen, including children, who seek entrance to Australia without legal visa are detained and most detainee are in detention centre. The biggest concern that asylum seekers are place in immigration centre which include children. There is 215 children in closed immigration dentition facilities and 642 children in community detention in Australia.
But there never seems to be enough money for justice and values. (Board).” Some of the people in the detention centers may actually be American citizens, thus being wrongfully detained. The system that they are put in makes it difficult to stand up for themselves because their status reduces the amount of due process a person may receives.
How would you feel if you and your family were denied the opportunity to a better life or had to wait years for one? The immigrants goal is to strive for a better future for themselves and their family. Coming here will help them achieve that goal. You may be thinking why cant they have a good future where they live? In some cases, the country they live in could be poor, not have many schools, is not safe, etc.
They are torturing him mercilessly to put nothing else, but pain and fear in his mind so he would eventually wind up as everyone else. For example, if anyone ended up at the Ministry of Love and being tortured, sooner or later the people are going to be too afraid to stand up against the government. They will just have to comply without action or questioning. In conclusion, the government of Oceania uses the slogan "Ignorance is Strength" to keep their people obedient and to keep their power above all, by limiting their knowledge, no contact with one another, and torture upon anyone who disobeys orders or breaks a law.
I.Introduction One of the greatest controversies in modern day is illegal immigrants. There are an approximate 11.4 undocumented immigrants that live in our country today. Now with your new action in place, I think it’s a good thing. Mainly because it allows lasting illegal immigrants to stay here, it allows jobs to go to documented americans, and gives children hope for a better future ahead. II.
I am going to begin today by asking everybody to imagine themselves in the comfort and safety of their homes. Now imagine waking up in your so called secure residence at three in the morning to bombs dropping, windows shattering, blood-curdling screams, and friends and neighbours dying in the streets. This dreaded occurrence is a living reality for many refugees such as Sharmina, a physician and loving father from Baghdad whose family moved to Canada in 2007, following the bombing of their hometown. Sharmina was quoted by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) saying “Getting refugee status is like getting a new birth certificate, you have to start your life again and it is not easy”. After arriving in Canada, Sharmina and
The more powerless and vulnerable the individual, the more significant their ethical claim. Since each person, paying little respect to one's lawful status or geographic area, has a transcendent dignity that must dependably be regarded, individuals progressing ought to appreciate the full scope of human rights, and others have an obligation to see that they are regarded, secured and satisfied. "Refugees and asylum seekers are humans, and should enjoy the whole range of human rights. Unless there are compelling reasons to believe that refugees or asylum seekers represent a serious danger to the common good, they should not be interned. Furthermore they should have access to work and thus the opportunity to fulfil their duty to contribute to the common good” (Australians Human Rights Commission, 2014).
Refugee rights are the right to seek asylum in another country if they are endangered, the access to the host country court acess, primary education, work, and Id cards. Many refugees that flee don’t have the proper