From lacking appreciation for his school texts, to fearing being called names by his peers, Gerald Graff had a hard time with reading as a child. In Disliking Books, an excerpt from Mr. Graff's renowned book entitled Beyond the Culture Wars : How Teaching the Conflicts Can Revitalize American Education, Graff shares his transition from being a young man that could barely get through a novel into a stimulated reader looking forward to the conversation that is literature.
Growing up in an ethnically mixed part of Chicago in a middle class Jewish family equaled a lot of pressure for Graff. Not only from his working class peers who may have perceived intellectual pursuit negatively, but from Graph's family, did this pressure descend. Graph's father was a well read man with a high expectation for his son to be the same. In fact Graff states,"... boys from my background would go to college," and from that point they would become a business, law, or medical major students. None of these professions applied to what Graff wanted for his future and he feared reading the books to get there.
Graff dutifully persisted to obtain good grades in school,
…show more content…
He even chose the profession of teaching. Graff describes a traditional viewpoint of first closely reading a book and then having an intellectual discussion, but this isn't what happened to him. He needed a passionate conversation to give him ground to stand on before diving into a reading. He found this to be the case for a lot of his students as well. Graff suggests that being able to to discuss literature is a primary factor in being able to read well. He goes further on to point out that teachers that can relate to students that are intimidated by reading have a great advantage over teachers that may have forgotten what it's like to learn how to think analytically about writing, reading and intellectual
In “Disliking Books,” by Gerald Graff, three major components stuck out to me. In paragraph 3, Graff talks about that for some in the working class, education is a source of freedom. This was a freedom that he took for granted. I feel like I can relate to this because I come from a middle class family, and while most of the time, I feel like being stuck in school most of the time is a burden, it is a freedom and a privilege that I take for granted as well.
A Summary of Gerald Graff’s “Disliking Books” Gerald Graff’s disliking books starts off as him declaring that his early fear of reading made him a better teacher to his students. It seems he had a lot of pressure put on him to read from his father who would push him to read, but Graff never became interested in reading likely because it felt forced if he was to enjoy reading it would have to come naturally. And though he speaks of his childhood in a sort of rough manner being a culturally mixed neighborhood and that the rougher working class children might beat him up if he was too peculiar or different or intellectual. He enjoyed the more practical pursuits in math and science rather than literature, as they would apply to everyday life and would make a good career field to go into, and when Gerald was child, boys who were bookworms were deemed "sissies" and beaten up.
Graff however does not provide any examples of how his teachers could have really done this. This makes his argument seem childish and not well thought out. If Graff had provided the reader with an example of how his teacher could have easily done this, the reader would be more inclined to agree with him. Graff features his love of sports using Sports Illustrated as an example along with books written by sports players. He goes on to tell the audience that he believes his desire to read books of a certain subject was not anti intellectual, just intellectual in a different way.
What doesn’t occur to us, though, is that schools and colleges might be at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into such street smarts and channel them into good academic work”(Graff 694). Graff is pulling into the emotions of people who did not do well academically or people who knew somebody like how he described in that quote. Throughout the essay, Graff pulls at the emotions of the audience and that is why his pathos is
In the article Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, Morris Fiorina addresses the issue of the illusion of political polarization. Political polarization is the separation of political beliefs into two separate extremes. The main illustration Fiorina uses is the use the electoral map. The electoral map is used to gauge which party won an election or polling.
In the article ‘Disliking Books’ written by Gerald Graff, he makes an undoubtable statement, that he is fortunate to understand something most literature or English instructors are not able to see. He talks about his constant uphill battle with literature and reading. He recalls how from a young age he struggled with all subjects, but his hatred was focused more on literature and social studies. As a child the cultural acceptance, at the time, was that boys who enjoyed literature and knowledge would have been labeled as a bookworm, or what we now refer to as a ‘nerd’. Thus giving more reason for other young boys and/or girls to bully one and other, on top of the fact that Mr. Graff was a young Jewish boy growing up in an ethnically mixed neighborhood in
Great literature can open discussion about values and morals. Reading such texts can spark discussion of issues like racism, bigotry, and sexism. Reading can teach individuals about topics they have never experienced before. However, in Francine Prose’s essay, I Know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read, she argues that using literature to teach outside values is wrong because it takes away from the art of the text. Though I believe that books contain important topics that can spark discussions of values in classrooms, I agree with Prose that teachers shouldn’t use books as a way to explicitly teach students outside values.
Her full use of strong language diminishes pieces of literature’s worth and questions their true significance. She claims this in a critical tone by stating, “Like most parents who have, against all odds, preserved a lively and still evolving passion for good books, I find myself, each September, increasingly appalled by the dismal lists of texts that my sons are doomed to waste a school year reading”(Prose, 176). She uses words like dismal to describe the book choices students would have to read according to the curriculum of the educational system. By using words like dismal, she expresses her feeling of disappointment towards the curriculum. She
They both touch on the subject in which some type of intellectuals are not held accountable. Graff pleads the readers to take interesting topics that they may be unrelated to school and look at them “through academic eyes.” He wants to convey the idea of taking street smart topics and turning them into intellectual courses. As for Rose, he shows us that the amount of schooling a person completed does not necessarily measure their intelligence level. According to Graff, “I believe that street smarts beat out book smarts in our culture...because they satisfy an intellectual thirst more thoroughly than school culture.”
The first time one is able to comprehend the meaning of a word is a momentous childhood moment that is forever engraved in one’s memory. Books and reading are significantly impactful to people’s lives; Mark Twain said that, “books are for people who wish they were somewhere else.” This statement is apropo for Sherman Alexie, who was a Native American living on a reservation during the time he learned to read. Sherman Alexie convinces his audience that an education is crucial to being successful by using personal anecdotes to captivate and create a connection with his audience and repetition to reiterate the importance of having an education. Alexie's use of personal anecdotes fortifies the impact he has on his audience.
Although he learned a lot due to books, he believes that each book teaches you a lesson. He believes that all bad books usually have a greater lesson to teach you than the good books. Books also thought him what he can and can’t do while writing. While reading books he learned “Good writing, on the other hand, teaches the learning writer about style, graceful narration, plot development, the
Graff says street smarts offer more life skills than the education provided in school. In other words, you can be smart without being highly educated because knowledge goes beyond academics. He grew up thinking he was anti-intellectual because his writing skills were not great about the topics he’s expected to write in school. Graff describes how sports helped him excel in academics and discover his hidden intellectualism. He believes ‘’Making students’ nonacademic interests of an object study is useful, the, for getting students’ attention and overcoming their boredom and alienation, but this tactic won’t in itself necessarily move them close to an rigorous treatment of those interests.’’
He supports this argument by citing a study conducted by students who have attended The University College London. The study proved to us that we no longer thoroughly read material, rather we just skim over most of what we read. From the convoluted works of the late 19th century, to the material of present day, the way we write and comprehend
The film Lost in Translation follows two Americans visiting Tokyo during important transitional periods in their lives. Charlotte is a recent college graduate trying to figure out her career while also moving on from the honeymoon phase of her new marriage. Bob Harris is essentially going through a mid-life crisis as he sorts through life post-movie stardom and struggles to maintain a relationship with his overbearing wife. The two find each other in the hotel bar as a result of their inability to sleep and form a connection based on their mutual isolation in both their relationships and the city of Tokyo. The film touches on the importance of communication as well as what it is like to be a foreigner alone in a vastly different culture.
People are living in the era of globalization. Every year, there is an increase in the number of immigrants and emigrants to foreign countries with the purpose of living and studying. As a result, cross-culture communication takes place in many nations. Obviously, no one can learn everything about all cultures and not any culture is completely similar. This inevitably entails culture conflict.