In the United States, there is an ongoing debate that’s been discussed for decades. The debate is on whether too much time around technology can harmful to a young teen’s behavior, social skills, and attention to school work. Recently two article have been released, “Blame Society, Not the Screen Time” by Danah Boyd and “Don’t Limit Your Teen’s Screen Time” by Chris Bergman, that take similar sides to the debate, but two very different approaches. Bergman explains that technology should be allowed often to take away the hunger for time in front of a screen, while Boyd demands that parents give their children more freedom to interact in order to lessen the desire for technology. Regarding the ongoing debate on technology’s effects on children, …show more content…
Boyd states that “they aren’t addicted to the computer; they’re addicted to the interaction, and being around their friends.” She believes that by keeping children so busy with work and chores, and not allowing them to socialize; they turn to technology to get the interaction that they crave. In an attempt to build credibility with the situation, she contradicts the very purpose of her article by giving her experience as a young teen who spent countless hours behind a screen. She states, “…the Internet was the only place where I didn’t feel judged. I wanted to go virtual, for my body to not matter, to live in a digital only world” (Boyd). She also uses fairly simple logic in her article; for example, when she says “If Americans truly want to reduce the amount young people use technology, we should free up more of their time” (Boyd) I believe she grabs the audience’s emotion in a negative way; telling parents that they are raising their kids incorrectly is not always the most effective tactic. To close the article, she states that “we’re raising our children in captivity and they turn to technology to socialize, learn and …show more content…
Boyd states that “they(videogames) taught me how to tell stories, create worlds and even how to save and spend money.” It’s clear that he holds a strong belief that videogames are beneficial to a child by giving knowledge through situations that games present. He holds credibility in the fact that he is the founder and chief executive of ChoreMonster. Also, he does his own study that determined that his children, who did not have TV restrictions, were a lot more interactive than those who did hold such restrictions; due to the fact that they were finally given the opportunity to watch TV, it held their full attention. The study is based on how the children react during a trip to “grandma’s” house, which is something that a lot of people who have had similar experiences can relate and have an emotional appeal to. Bergman makes a very simple statement that “technology is not going away or becoming less popular” (Bergman); while this not a very complex thought, its holds truth and should be considered in the debate continuing to circulate in the United
In the first section of The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr he emphasizes the downs to the very powerful internet that we use everyday. He explains how this era of the internet predicts an age of narcissism and mediocrity. Carr gives examples of how we quest after every new technology medium, how the medium alters humans, and all the technology that has shuffled and led to the internet. Carr uses the author of Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man saying “ whenever a new medium comes along we are attracted to it.
In the chapter, Growing up Tethered, from Alone Together, Sherry Turkle, focuses on how adolescents of this technological era are tethered and consistently feel the need to want to connect via cellphones and other electronics no matter the risks (430). She continues to discuss how we portray ourselves differently online because online we have time to create, edit, and delete biographical information (437). Turkle mentions the stress and pressure that is associated with creating and shaping one 's online image or identity and that most, if not all online profiles contain some sort of truth bending; Turkel hints that life without these online characters is beneficial or better
In the article “ Let Kids Run Wild Online”, Boyd describes the situation in which many parents currently find themselves in at an age of a technology-soaked world. Many parents are constantly contemplating the pros and cons of letting kids run free on the internet or retaining their freedom from being involved in the world. However the various pros that outweigh the cons, such as developing reliable communication skills definitely suggest kid should be able to explore the internet without having many limitations. Many would say Boyd surely has a strong point within this article. Due to our world relying on technology, kids should definitely be allowed to navigate the internet at a level of high trust and support to an agreeable extent.
Furthermore, in present day society, people are sometimes too engaged or busy with social media or technology to actually set out into the world and interact with real beings. Human interaction and socialization declines. In addition, devices like video games also stand in the way of one’s educational process. By engaging in such activities, homework or other important matters is left unattended and forgotten. Thusly, technology is a considerable threat to relationships because they captivate people into the virtual world rather than the back-to-Earth
Introduction – 45 to 60 seconds Audio Josh wants to ruffle a little feathers during his next presentation so he has selected a topic that is controversial. He wants to talk about how technology is a great distraction for many teenagers. He began his presentation by telling a story.
They Say, I Say: Chapter Thirteen Exercise 1: • Conventional wisdom claims that internet use is harmful for the brain, and that Americans, mostly millennials, spend too much time on social media and other forms of the Web. In Chapter Thirteen of “They Say\I Say”: IMHO, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein explains the debate of social media and its effect on students’ ability to read, write, and communicate, also explain that conversations that occur on the Web are not real conversations. Technology is a tool; it should not overwhelm the user. The internet not a dynamic entity with malign or benign intent. The proper utilization of it, however, has improved educations and it should be viewed as a accomplishment of the human mind for improving the human mind. Technology, and most often the Internet, is construed as a malign unit, whose purpose is to corrupt and stultify thought.
Growing Up Tethered A professor at the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT, Sherry Turkle talks about how kids today are attached and somewhat obsessed with technology in her article called “Growing Up Tethered.” Turkle interviews with many different teenagers about the different types of technology they possess and how it impacts their everyday life. She talks a lot about how technology can do away with our privacy and also how people feel the need to be constantly connected.
People believe technological advances are changing the public’s mind that they must avoid and restrain from using the technologies because they are destroying our experience with real life. This new movement is educating
A big problem in the Veldt is, How do parents and kids stop themselves from getting too addicted to technology. Computer game should only be played after you do important work, such as, cleaning, homework, special projects ect. Also, even if you’re busy don’t use technology to keep kids away from you for too long, better yet, not at all, get them a friend to play with, a board game, says techaddiction. I agree with this because if everyone just played technology all day no one would go to school, no one would go to college, job, money, house, all gone, and all of the people just playing on technology would become obese and ill, have to go to the hospital, but since no one went to school and collage, no one would be a doctor and everyone would die! Because the children in The Veldt were doing this and that’s why they got addicted to technology in the first
Writer Esther Dyson equates, “Being fed so much processed information- video, audio, images …- is like being fed too much processed, sugar-rich good.” The comparison of technology’s endless capabilities to a popular, unhealthy material distinctly emphasizes technologies appeal, yet detriment to children. When this translates into education, children turn their eye away from learning and towards distraction. According to University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor Leslie Reed, “Students in [a 2016] study estimated that … they spent 20 percent of their classroom time using digital devices for activities unrelated to class” (2). Because technology is so broad and never-ending, students, now more than more than ever, have the ability to instigate their distraction with ease.
Sue Honoré, an independent learning consultant who has studied people who were born from 1982 to 2002 has that “while young people are "undoubtedly capable of long periods of concentration", those who spend a lot of time alone using technology tend to have less in the way of communication skills, self-awareness and emotional intelligence”. It has been proven that around 31 nations that students who used computers everyday in class had lower test scores in reading and math than students who don’t use them as much (Study: Students Who Use in School Doesn’t Help Test Scores). Though technology is amazing and has given so many people different opportunities they would’ve never had before it is resulting in a few bad habits for students. Casey Schools systems around the United States have begun to rely on technology to teach their students instead of teachers to teach them. According Michael Godsey, a veteran high-school English educator, even said and agreed with many people today that we are at the point in time where since we have the internet at our fingertips, there is really no need for teachers
Looking back at Boyd’s overall argument, she believes that people must learn and develop skills to become digitally literate which enables them to understand the programs that went into building all the electronic device that people use on a daily basis. She was able to give the reader a variety of sub-claims and evidence to support her argument. She wants other to know how important digital literacy is and how it effectively changes the way you think and process information from the internet. Boyd was able to show the readers how complicated technology can be and how people can carelessly trust what shows up on their screen. She broaden the view of many people, in addition, the sample of other author’s view on digital literacy has given more
Often, parents tell us they feel technology is taking over their our teens lives, but they don 't know when enough is enough, or what they can do to control it. Since there is no perfect answer or specific line to draw, I suggest parents engage in one of the core principles and be intentional. If our teens, or your teens are lacking in different areas such as school performance, energy, grades, or reading, hearing, or listening skills then it 's time to put a limit on these computers. In an article, Teensand the Internet: How Much is Too Much?, by Stephanies Newman, she includes a statement saying in addition to a decline in any school related issue; absenteeism, complaints of being tired during classes, or decreasing in grade performance,
There has been a negative effect that teenager’s brain goes through and it does not let them think creatively and miss their brains up. Technology can go into positive and negative effect, but one thing that teenagers and parents cannot do is to stop using it for a long time. They get obsessed with it and you cannot get rid of these devices. Technology negatively affects brain development in children because usage affects their learning, and therefore technology use should be
But, it’s not just the overuse of it, it's also how they use it. Some are using it to get a hold of test answers, other people’s personal information, and even pornography. Teens need to learn to limit their usage to technology because of all the negative effects of it. Especially the ones who are always dependent on it, and have their life revolve around it. Although teens can use technology in a beneficial way,