Count Charles’ Persuasion to Religious Governance
In almost every Count that has ever been reigned in the middle ages, there is no leader like Count Charles, who takes a risky approach to governing a land with the idea of religion as an important aspect of his position. Count Charles, aka “Blessed Charles the Good” is well known for feeding the poor, promoting peace and security, but religion is definitely a big influence to his reign as the Count of Flanders. At first, before doing any research on Count Charles’ religious ruling, I would already believe that Charles is a spiritual nobleman that everyone would admire because of how devastated Flanders felt when they heard about his death in 1127. Fortunately, my thoughts on Count Charles
…show more content…
"The Murder of Charles the Good." Readings in Medieval History. 4th ed. Toronto: Published by University of Toronto Press, 2010. 382-93. Print.
Galbert of Bruges presents a story about Charles’ life as the Count of Flanders and how his death was plotted by the Erembalds Family. Galbert was an important notary to Count Charles because he provides an exceptional perspective by including different chapters to his progression. His work is definitely trustworthy because he describes all the succession and disputes that Charles has gone through as the Count of Flanders. As the notary for Charles, Galbert approaches his work with care and respect because he wants the readers to feel honored and pity for what Charles wanted to persuade throughout his reign. Additionally, Galbert provides significant evidences about Charles’ potential opportunities that he could have taken when he was offered many important titles as a result of a prodigious ruling to the Flanders. Throughout this story, Galbert implicates a lot of admiration for his Count as he likes to think of him as “The pious Count who was born in our time and grew up from boyhood to perfect manhood” (Geary 390). It is obvious that Galbert must say good things about his own Count, but my perspective of Count Charles has really made me appreciate how religion can change the way he governed Flanders. Overall, Galbert demonstrates an honest perspective about Charles’ life and it’s a well composed timeline about
…show more content…
The journalist argues that even though the entire society wasn’t satisfied by his religious ruling, people should still appreciate the peace and resources that he provided to the needy people. With so much knowledge about Christianity and being devoted, Jacob provides a strong perspective about Charles’ religious life because he is very religious himself as he explains praying to the Holy Rosary has made him appreciate the kind acts that Charles has shown as the Count of Flanders. Moreover, White provides a lot of evidences by using quotes in the Holy Rosary that supports why Charles refers to Holy Scriptures while ruling Flanders. Throughout this article, I found White’s analysis of Count Charles’ religious life really useful because he provides good examples of why religion has made a big impact to governing a society and how religion can change people’s perspective into believing certain
Prior to the French Revolution, French society was divided into three distinct estates: the First Estate, the Second Estate, and the Third Estate. Each estate was represented by individuals of a certain repute who had different roles in 17th century French society. In his written play, Cyrano de Bergerac, Edmond Rostand portrays this class division through his many characters and their place in society. In the 17th century, Roman Catholicism was at its prime in French society.
"Charles" did not spend all of his time and energy on warfare. He was a great admirer of education. He built schools across Europe. He brought scholars down. Among these scholars were some of the greatest religious scholars and teachers of the Middle Ages.
The conviction of a Churchman is also interesting because pre-reformation, the Church was separate from the Crown and considered the law. During Catholicism England, churchmen were considered as divine beings, the link between humankind and God, and incapable of sin. However, this case shows a strong shift from placing churchmen on a pedestal, to
Despite this, he repeatedly commends Louis for his bravery and “his zealous care for the churches of God and his wonderful valor in administering the affairs of the kingdom” (Suger 23). By his reverent and admiring tone, Suger portrays Louis as a hero of France whose violent but forceful deeds were morally acceptable and even necessary for bringing order to his kingdom. For example, after laying siege to Corbeil and restoring a new count, Suger expresses that “by the gift of God, [Louis] gained an excellent victory and made the beginnings of his noble rule” (Suger 68). Suger’s tone remains consistent with each one of Louis’ acts, deeming them as appropriate and just responses to the various treachery that he had to face as the King of France. Not all of Louis’ deeds were violent, however; Suger supports Louis when he used discretion and peace when the situation called for it.
Barbara Diefendorf's book, The Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre is a window into the struggle of religion and secular power during the Protestant Reformation. Beyond the social elitism, mob mentality is an ever-present force that is ignited during the Religious Wars. Differences in religion are a contributor to factional tensions. Manipulation by religious leaders and misunderstanding between the two religious sects’ practices create this religious tension. Although Protestants and Catholics share the core teachings of Christianity, a struggle for secular power, feelings of tribalism, and conflicting religious ideals not only solidify the schism between these two sects of Christianity, but escalated these tensions to bloodshed.
Similar to Emilie Durkheim and Maurice Halbwachs, Harvey was interested in the tensions of the French society following the humiliating defeat of the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871). Throughout Harvey’s research, the author was interested not only in the political ramifications, but also looking at class conflict over the Basilica. Specifically, the division between the Communards (socialist radicals) located heavily in the Paris working class and the conservative royalist faction, the Cult of the Sacred Heart. The Cult of the Sacred Heart was a sect within the Catholic church advocating for repentance to Christ and mysticism (Harvey 1979, 364). Moreover, the Cult of the Sacred Heart was closely connected to the nobility of the Ancien Regime.
To what extent do the sources support the view that Charles’ personal rule was eleven years of tyranny. [30] Source A and Source B undoubtedly supports the view that the personal rule was tyrannical. Unlike Source C which is not in specific reference to the personal rule and does not agree with the statement, Source D refers to both the positives and negatives of the source but ultimately prove the personal rule was tyrannical. The view that personal rule was tyrannical is supported greatly by source A. Pym’s speech at the Short Parliament voiced the opinions of Parliament that had been festering since it was dissolved 1629.
King Charles’ execution speech is saturated with religious references, particularly regarding the divine will of God and belief in the afterlife. In prayer, King Charles beseeches God to “take those courses that are best for the good of the Kingdom and your own Salvations.” This reflects the religious landscape at the time as it was believed that it was God’s providence that sanctioned the regicide as well as the later declaration of England as a commonwealth and the moving away from a monarchic system. As a king, Charles would have been expected to uphold religious ideals, therefore his beliefs shown in his speech give insight into that aspect of the religious landscape; however, this information does not cover the religious beliefs of wider
Kaplan, Benjamin J. Divided By Faith: Religious Conflict And The Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007). Benjamin J. Kaplan’s Divided By Faith: Religious Conflict And the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe challenges the traditional view that religious toleration became prevalent in Europe following the Enlightenment. Kaplan is a Professor of Dutch History at the University College London and the University of Amsterdam. The purpose of Divided by Faith is to provide a new outlook on the history of religious tolerance and conflict in early modern Europe. Kaplan illustrates this purpose by diverging from traditional scholarship on toleration in early modern Europe.
In the court case of Tempel Anneke, many social and economic factor determined the outcome of her trial. Was it the misfortune of the people in her community that she was unable to help, or the fact that she was known to be a very powerful healer? Could it also have been that she was not part of the norm of society based on her characteristics of the general woman figure she portrayed in the 1600’s? Through the analysis of, The Trial of Tempel Anneke: Records of a Witchcraft Trial in Brunswick, Germany, 1663’s court transcriptions the details will show how these social and economic factors played such an important part in the trial that convicted her to death.
The state of the monarchy in England has always been tumultuous and unstable. The reign of the house of Stuart was no different and followed the precedents of all the houses that came before them. Some of the issues that Charles faced during his reign were some that were already set in motion before he came to the thrown while other problems he himself had caused or aggravated. One of these problems that was carried over from his father’s reign was that of both James and Charles favorite George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham. Popular opinion of king’s favorites have never been particularly high and the case of Buckingham was no exception.
As an official in the palace and one of the king’s friends, Einhard had one of the best possible views of Charlemagne and his rule. In this “public history of this most distinguished and deservedly most famous king” (Einhard 51), Einhard writes to Charlemagne’s descendants and the rest of posterity about the fame of the Frankish Empire and to preserve the memory of its mightiest ruler. Einhard is an extremely biased author, however. Once upon a time, Charlemagne offered shelter and kindness to Einhard in his court, and in return Einhard ignored the more shocking facts about Charlemagne, like his true motives in practicing Catholicism and his dysfunctional family, specifically his daughters and grandchildren, even after Charlemagne’s death in
The series of questions produces discomfort to the clergymen and the guiltiness of the white churches. Martin Luther compares ideas in order to express his disappointment, guiltiness, lachrymose feeling, and injustice in
“With great piety and devotion [ Charles] followed the Christian religion, in which he had been reared from infancy.” “For this reason he constructed a church of stunning beauty at Aachen and adorned it with gold and silver, with lamps, grillwork, and doors made of solid bronze” (26). Charles was very committed to helping the poor with charity. Not only did he give to the poor in his own land but he gave to the poor overseas. Einhard quoted an example on his charity.
In the middle of the 12th century, King Henry II had a friend and trusted confidante in the person of Thomas Becker. In late 1170, Henry II’s words would incite four knights to murder Becket. In this paper, we will examine the proposition that Becket deliberately pursued a policy that led to his murder to advance his cause. Becket was the son of a London merchant, by training an accountant, who rose to become the Archbishop of Canterbury. Becket had worked for his cousin who was a banker.