ipl-logo

Boston Massacre Dbq

694 Words3 Pages

The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th, 1770 on King Street in Boston, Massachusetts. 5 men were killed and 6 others were harmed as a result of it. It started as a British guard was being harassed by a mob of angry civilians. 8 more soldiers joined his side who took on what he was going through. Eventually, guns were fired and killed 3 people on the spot, while 2 others died afterwards due to injuries. Now, who is to blame for this incident? Well, the British Soldiers are to blame for the Boston Massacre because they didn’t hear things clearly and they reacted with violence rapidly.

The British soldiers are to blame for the Boston Massacre because they didn’t listen carefully and shot immediately after they thought the captain said to …show more content…

Although they were being harassed, they weren’t being harmed. In Document D, it states “I went up to the main guard and addressed myself to the captain and said to him What have you done? He said sir, it was none of my doings, the soldiers fired of their own accord…His character is good as a gentleman and soldier. I think it exceeds any of the Corps!” The soldiers firing on their own accord shows they reacted with violence too quickly, as well as their guard never ordering them to do so. The guard was said to have a good character and seemed surprised by the incident as well, so the soldiers most likely didn’t pick this type of reaction up from their guard. This shows that the British are to blame due to reacting with violence quickly because even though they were provoked, that doesn’t change the fact that they still …show more content…

However, it is wrong to fully blame the colonists because they were getting unfair treatment from the British already with taxes. It was merely a protest. “...great number of heavy clubs and snowballs being thrown at them, by which all of our lives were in imminent danger, some persons at the same time calling out, damn your bloods-why don’t you fire.” (Document B) The colonists are seen here provoking the soldiers with their protests, and although it may have been a cause leading to a terrifying effect, it still doesn’t change the fact that the British Soldiers had reacted with violence

Show More
Related

  • Shatyra Wiley Report: The Boston Massacre

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the shooting, the people of Boston demanded that the soldiers be tried and executed for the shooting. Two soldiers were found guilty of manslaughter. This whole incident is outrageous. There isn't any need to result to violence when something goes wrong.

    Read More

  • Captain Thomas Preston: The Boston Massacre

    408 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout our lives, we drive tough times and empower the goods. We learn and examine events of history that we never picture could happen in our life. These Historical events teach us lessons that stick with us until the very last day. The Boston Massacre left many casualties and people wounded.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Revolutionary War

    1143 Words  | 5 Pages

    There were plenty of occasion where these colonist were to blame for the way Britain was making a combat towards them. “On March 5, 1770, a crowd of Boston boys and men surrounded a number of British soldiers and began taunting them cursing them while pelting them with snowballs. Order quickly broke down and the frightened soldiers fired into the crowd. When the shooting ended, several people were dead and more were wounded”, (Document 2). The engraving created by Paul Revere was created to arouse anti British feelings.

    Read More

  • Examples Of What Really Happened At The Boston Massacre

    1470 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Boston Massacre, also referred to as the Incident on King Street was a street fight that broke out between colonial residents and British Soldiers. One of the most common misconceptions about this event, roots form it's name. The Boston Massacre was not truly a massacre, in fact it only resulted in five deaths. It was more of a chaotic riot that arose from enraged colonist.

    Read More

  • The Complexities Of War In The Things They Carried By Tim O Brien

    1002 Words  | 5 Pages

    The perception of peer pressure and societal expectations add to the severity and violence of war. The troops feel pressured to commit violent crimes in order to defend themselves as well as to live up to the ideals of courage and masculinity. This emphasizes how dehumanizing war is, with people sometimes acting violently out of shame or fear of being judged rather than out of genuine

    Read More

  • Was The Boston Massacre An Accident?

    166 Words  | 1 Pages

    The colonists was throwing snowballs and had no other way to protect themselves. On the other hand the Redcoats had to protect themselves also. Based on other sources I was given in multiple court trials the court room discussed what happened in the Boston Massacre. It was both the colonists and the redcoats fault.

    Read More

  • Riots: The Boston Massacre

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is called the Boston Massacre. Nobody in our colonies or in Europe knows what happened except for the people who were there. The trial was scheduled to end three days ago, but it just kept on going. Right now they are still

    Read More

  • What Was The Boston Massacre

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    There was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because according to Captain Preston and John Bufford, the colonist and the troops were both armed and attacked each other. This means that what happened in Boston was not a massacre. The first reason the event was not a massacre is because the event in Boston 1770 was a war. As stated by Captain Preston “The colonists were assembling to attack the troops… they surrounded the guard and threatened to execute… after a soldier was attacked he fired…”. This supports my claim because it proves that, both the troops and colonists were attacking each other, and the troops attacking the colonists was not a random decision.

    Read More

  • Massacre: The Boston Massacre

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    This statement disproves the definition of massacre because it was not an indiscriminate slaughter of people. If the soldiers were begin attacked it was merely self defense. Mr. Woodall was not the only account that stated the soldiers were being attacked by the townspeople before any firing took place, Jane Whitehouse said that same. She said that one man threw wood at one of the soldiers. Further more looking at the Revere painting, Preston’s deposition and also testimonies from people that gave their account of the story we can conclude that calling it the “Boston Massacre” would be stretching the truth of an event that has been warped for years.

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre Essay

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first misconception people have about the Boston Massacre

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Revolutionary War

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    The British fought to defend themselves. They had no intentions of getting back at the colonists for their misdeeds. The colonists should also be held accountable for the first shot, because the British didn 't plan ahead to specifically target the colonists. Though, the Colonists purposely targeted the British. I believe

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre Dbq

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was the Boston Massacre an accident, people say it was, people say it wasn't. Till what I´ve heard the Boston Massacre is not an accident because according to the articles many witnesses were there to experience it such as Benjamin Burdick he had a testimony of the Boston massacre that he said in court. Another guy that was there to witness the horrible traject was Nutent Prince both of them saw what happened. Nutent Prince supports either side because it says in source D that he saw snow balls, clubs, buckets, that the colonist had to defend themselves. Also the testimony of Thomas Preston who was the captain of the british soldiers, said i source B that many of the civilians were yelling saying ¨Come on rascals, your bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare...dam you…

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: Self-Defense Or Self Defense?

    158 Words  | 1 Pages

    he infamous street fight that took place in Boston, Massachusetts is referred to as The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The riot started when a few young boys began to throw stones and rocks at British soldiers who were guarding the Customs House. The crowd around the boys started to grow larger and larger, and then people from the crowd begun to join the boys, throwing ice at the soldiers and taunting them. The soldiers then fired, killing five colonists.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Boston Massacre

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: The Incident On King Street

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.

    Read More

More about Boston Massacre Dbq

Open Document