As we had read in the assignment titled ‘Boundless World History’, “Democracy in Athens was overthrown in 411 BCE because of its poor handling of the Peloponnesian War.” Athens and Sparta had engaged in the Peloponnesian War that was between 404 and 431 BCE. In ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta were two of the most important city-states. According to most historians, the Peloponnesian War battle, which was supposed to have almost consumed the entire Greek world, was the most important battle of its time. Since Sparta won and Athens ultimately lost the Peloponnesian War, it can be stated that Athens was unable to accomplish the Peloponnesian War successfully. After the Peloponnesian War conflict, Sparta's naval supremacy grew quickly, but Athens' naval supremacy was questioned. The Peloponnesian War conflict eventually paved the way for the Macedonians to overthrow the Greeks in the mid-fourth century. All this happened because of the war's devastation, which led to great damage, debilitated the nation, and ultimately aided the Greek's long-term separation (Cartwright, 2018). …show more content…
In response to Athens' downfall, its people of Athens held democratic politicians just like Cleophon and Cleon responsible for it The Thirty Tyrants, which was a pro-Spartan oligarchy was established in Athens in 404 BCE as the Spartan army's reassurance to rebel. The Thirty Tyrants' 13-month rule was enabled by the Spartan admiral Lysander, who oversaw the Spartan navy in 405 BCE at Aegospotami. All through the Thirty Tyrants' tenure, 5% of Athens’ population died, private properties were apprehended, and supporters of democracy were exiled. Therefore, these arguments back the claim that Sparta and its associates won the Peloponnesian War. This Peloponnesian War also marked the end of Athens' military and political dominance in the Mediterranean (Scaliger,
Joe Nardulli How did Athenian Democracy spur on the Peloponnesian War? What did we learn from the war? The term democracy is defined as “ruled by the people” and was coined by the Athenian government, which was run through a radically democratic stance from 508 to 322 B.C.
Although Pericles’ words strived to inspire and encourage the Athenian people to fight valiantly against Sparta and its allies, they are not enough to embolden the Athenian people onto victory in the Peloponnesian War. His words do motivate Athenians to make tremendous effort in extending their power and defeating Sparta and its allies, but in the end, may have lead to Athenians’ demise. Fostering pride and determination throughout the war, Athens makes several attempts to expand its naval power, but fails in its plan to overtake Syracuse on the coast of Sicily, weakening its efforts against Sparta and its allied city-states. Finally, in the naval battle at Aegospotami, the Spartans have a decisive victory over Athens, and the Athenians eventually surrender, ending the Peloponnesian War.
A war against Sparta began during this time, which was caused by the poor decisions made by the current general. At some point Sicily invaded Athens, followed by a change in democracy to a more oligarchy system of government. Athens was fighting for their government and changes were being made over and over, power was being put on different people and becoming overrun. But finally, in 338 B.C., Athens was taken by Mecedonia. This drastic end in democracy came after Athens lost the battle of Chaeronea.
The Peloponnesian War was fought from 431-404 BCE in ancient Greece by the two most powerful city-states, Athens and Sparta. Military commander and politician, Alcibiades, son of Clinias, was well-born and wealthy. He was, on one hand, the most handsome, a great orator, patient, hard-working, skilled, and generous man; however, he was lustful, of bad moral character, and easily angered (Nepos, Alcibiades, (Albert Fleckeisen, 1886), chapter 1). During the Peloponnesian War, Alcibiades led the Athenians, but once he was convicted of defacing the Hermae, he fled to Sparta out of fear of death, betraying Athens. Once at Sparta, he helped the Spartans lead in the war; however, eventually, the Spartans feared that Alcibiades would soon betray them
Athens, had many challenges, both geographically and alliance wise. The Athenians were advised to appease all feuds within its neighboring polis. Greece was needed to unite under one cause, and that could not be done while the polis in Greece were at war.
The Oligarch admits that a democracy a type of government which is much better suited to deal with the needs of a naval power. In his own words “…it is only just that the poorer classes and the common people of Athens …seeing that it is the people who man the fleet, and have brought the city her power.” (The Old Oligarch, 1.2). While the more heavily armored infantry would still be comprised of higher status men who could afford the proper armor, anyone could help to man a ship; as men from the lower classes became more involved in defending their city they would have wanted to be more fairy represented in their government. Democracy would have appeased the men who manned the ships, allowing Athens to have a large and effective navy, making them the leading maritime power in the Aegean.
The Peloponnesian War was a difficult period in Athenian history. Every victory was quickly followed by a crushing defeat. The overall morale of the Athenian people was low. During the funeral oration, Pericles gave a speech with this thesis: In order to protect the splendor and ideals of Athens, the Athenian citizens needed to undergo hardship for her sake.
Since Athens navy was getting all the recognition for the win, Athens got lots of money from other greek city-states to protect them. This sparked a flare in other city-states like sparta. That all created the Peloponnesian war and Athens downfall. It 's hard to believe, but winning the persian war really made one of greece’s biggest city-states have a giant downfall. Everything good that greece did turned out bad in the
I believe that ancient Athens was not a true democracy. In a democracy all of the people are able to vote, and have a choice on who runs their city. In ancient Athens only the men were able to vote. Their government was Demokratia, and this excluded the women, the children, the metics, and the slaves. Even though their government was ran by the people themselves, only the men in the city could vote.
The Athenians regarded the wars against Persia as their greatest and most characteristic moment. However The events that take place between the defeat of Darius constant tension with sparta would soon lead to the peloponnesian war. The battle of Marathon (490 BC), is definitely one of the greatest battles to affect greek history. Had the Athenians lost, all culture of what we may know of greece would be lost if it weren 't for Themistocles. Themistocles was the person who developed the most advanced weapon at its day.
The historian Thucydides described himself as a wealthy Athenian general whose exile to the Peloponnese allowed him to personally observe, from both the sides of the conflict, a comprehensive account of the Peloponnesian War. Book 1 in Thucydides’ “History of the Peloponnesian War” is dedicated to explaining over fifty years of the events and proceedings that led to the abandonment of the Thirty Year’s Peace and subsequent war. In Book 1 he identifies four main incidents, which I shall refer to as ‘grievances’, regarding the conduct of Athens towards both their Delian members and the Peloponnesian allies. Yet he also mentions what he deems to be a more ‘real’ truth than these four grievances that led to Sparta and the Peloponnese going to
The Peloponnesian War and Rome's conquest of city-states in Italy and Carthage were important historical occurrences that impacted the power structures and political environments of their respective territories. While Rome's goals against city-states in Italy and Carthage and Sparta's goals in the Peloponnesian War have certain similarities, there are also significant distinctions that illustrate the particular reasons and tactics used by each civilization. As follows, I will mention the similarities and differences between each civilization. Similarities Firstly, the similarity between Sparta's purpose in the Peloponnesian War and Rome's objectives is the pursuit of power and dominance. Both civilizations aimed to take control of and exert more influence over more city-states and areas.
The Peloponnesian War is considered one of the most important wars in ancient Greek history, which took place between Athens and its allies in the Delian Union and the allies of Sparta in the Peloponnesian Alliance, and it was one of the most prominent conflicts that Athens faced in ancient Greece, which lasted from 431 BC to 404 BC Yes, it can be said that Athens was unable to deal effectively with the Peloponnesian War for several reasons: 1. The weakness of the ground forces: Athens relied mainly on its naval power, while Sparta's power lay in its land armies centered around maintaining territory. This led to the inability of the Athenian forces to fight decisive battles against the forces of Sparta. 2.
Athens organized a group of Greek city states into the Delian League and eventually lead and dominated all of the city states in the League. Athens’s military prowess allowed them to look down on the other members of the League and treat them as members of an empire instead of equals. This caused some to view them with hostility which sparked the conflicts between Athens and Sparta that lead to the Peloponnesian War. The direct democracy of Athens wasn’t actually as inclusive and steady as the statement at Pericles 's funeral state, “Our Constitution is called a democracy because power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people (Doc C).” In fact, of the 450,000 citizens of Athens in 430 BC, only about 40,000 people had the power to vote.
the idea of representative government began to take root in some city states, specifically Athens. Athenian reformers moved toward democracy, rule by the people. In Athens citizens participated directly in political decision making. However there were limitations on citizenship to ensure that only the most rational people were able to vote. Through the construction of democracy in Athens, equality of all citizens became greater, and the city would become the top democracy of all the democracies.