Brown V Board Of Education Of Topeka In 1954

837 Words4 Pages

Brown v Board of Education of Topeka in 1954 was a landmark United States Supreme Court Case. The Case was about a Court that declared the state laws for separating public schools for black and white students. A sixty year proceeding in the Brown Case there were a lot of race relations in the U.S. it had been over ruled by racial segregation. The Brown Case served as an agitator for the modern civil rights movement inspiring education to improve everywhere and forming legal means of challenging segregation in all areas of societies. In the 1950’s schools were segregated by race and Linda Brown thought it was violating the Fourteenth Amendment because they had to be segregated by schools. When both of the schools had similar buildings, transportations, …show more content…

The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on the behalf of their twenty children. It was called to reverse its policy of racial segregation. The name of the plaintiff, Oliver L. Brown was a parent, a welder, an assistant pastor at his local church, and an African American. Brown’s daughter Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school that is one mile away from Sumner Elementary , a white school that was seven blocks from her house. The case “Oliver Brown et al. v. The Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was named after Oliver Brown as a legal …show more content…

Board of Education as heard before the Supreme Court combined five cases. All were NAACP sponsored cases, but the Kansas case was unique because the group in that there was no dispute of the segregated school’s physical plant, curriculum or staff. The lower court also observed that African American children are required to travel much farther distances than they would be required to travel could they attend a white school but also countered that the school district transports African American children to and from school free of charge and that no such service was provided to white children. In 1953, the Court heard the case but was unable to decide the issue and asked to rehear the case in full 1953, with exceptional attention to whether the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause prohibited the operation of separate public schools for whites and blacks. The Court reargued the case at the demand of Justice Felix Frankfurter who uses reargument as stalling tactic to allow the Court to gather unanimity around Brown’s opinion that would outcast

Open Document