Justice is the foundation of a Nation founded on laws. There are several perspectives to an event and justice will prevail in the Nation of Laws. In order to find justice one has to consider all the facts, credibility, and the consistency in a crime or situation in order to determine the right course of action. Julius Caesar is an individual who seeks justice. He was murdered and his killer cries for mercy. This “killer” did not grant Julius Caesar mercy. Justice must be served to someone and it should be served for Caesar because his death was unjust and done with such cruelty. He was betrayed and his killer premeditated Caesar 's murder and committed treason. His killer claimed that he killed out of good intentions, but yet his crime would …show more content…
However, because of what he did, it would not be just for Brutus to receive mercy. That is why the jury and the judge must be persuaded by the prosecution. The prosecution 's main argument is that because Brutus premeditated and committed treason, he therefore should not be able to go to purgatory out of mercy. Parts of the articles of Confederation, Constitution, and the U.S Code should help the prosecution 's claim. Since Brutus’ trial will be based on his character in Shakespeare play it is easy to visualize that in the beginning Brutus was a coward at first and was scared of killing,, but later he would change and take up the courage to kill Caesar. At first Cassius did convince brutus to kill, but Brutus had free will so he shouldn 't have chosen a path that he did not favor in the first place. Brutus will argue that what he did was out of the good of Rome because Caesar was a tyrant. Yet, if we look at Caesar 's character in the play, he was not a tyrant at all. He was hard-headed at times and stern, but overall he cared for the people in Rome. As Antony said, Caesar denied the crown to rule three times and cared for his people because he offered them land in his will. Brutus could have honestly done this crime out of jealousy because Brutus was just as popular as Caesar but only Caesar was favored enough to be offered
The lack of evidence makes the defense’s argument that Caesar would have lead Rome astray invalid and simply an assumption made in attempt to heighten Brutus’ credibility. Also, if Brutus did not want to be a part of the conspiracy, why did he let the whole group meet at his house? Why did he stay in touch with Cassius? If Brutus really didn’t want to be part of the assassination, why didn’t he take one of the many opportunities to back out? For example, when the conspiracy showed at his house, in the middle of the night, he let them into his residence without any hesitation.
Caesar was a great military leader, he was a man of strength, and he conquered all of Rome. Caesar was not afraid to take charge to take Rome high and make them more powerful. If he had to Caesar would kill anyone that stood in his way of making Rome more powerful. “Kill everyone inside” “without hesitation, his men, swords drown, burst inside the bar, and soon the street was quiet.”
Has Brutus truly justified the need to kill Caesar or has he simply rationalized it for himself? Brutus has multiple reasons that support him in joining the conspiracy to kill Julius Caesar. He did the right thing by joining the conspiracy because he’s loyal to the people of Rome. Brutus believes that Caesar will become full of himself once he’s in power and forget about the people. Lastly he thinks that Caesar is rude and arrogant towards others.
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
He tried to keep it minimal by devising a plan to only kill Caesar and keep Marc alive so it wouldn't seem so obvious to the people. “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent that you may hear: Believe me for my honor and have respect for mine honor that you may believe." Killing someone for the sake of keeping your country alive sounds outrageous however during that time, it was much different. So if it meant taking out one life then a life it is.
After a brief moment of reviewing this prolonged case, the members of the court hereby declare that Marcus Brutus, who was suspected and charged 1st degree murder for the assassination of Julius Caesar, is NOT guilty! It has been notable that Brutus is still noble to the people of Rome and still has their respect. He had the intention of questioning his motives when other members of the conspirators didn’t because he was smarter and more intelligent. Here was evidence of manipulation by Cassius, he created a false letter by the people of Rome to persuade Brutus to do something. Cassius talked poorly about Caesar’s health and physical condition and was the first to come with the plan.
However, Brutus continually feels the need to defend his actions and justify his crime. If he is truly confident in his deed, he would not stammer to find justifications. Yet, Brutus may not want power, he may really want justice. In his mind, murdering Caesar, was the only route to go.
The actions of the conspirators went against the essential principles of Roman law and justice, which were focused on the concepts of fairness and equity. The conspirators' actions were in direct violation of the Roman legal system, which aimed to ensure equal treatment and justice for all individuals within the empire. Throughout the 450-year republic, the Senate and the Roman people governed Rome, with the emperor acting as the primary ruler of the empire. Both the Roman legal and judicial systems and the conspirators' motives to defend the Roman Republic from Caesar's potential tyranny failed to justify what they did. Laws and justice were used to govern the Roman Republic, and the conspirators' actions broke these rules.
When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.
And while Brutus did work in part with other conspirators, which eventually led to him killing Caesar, he did it for a more morally sound reason which was that Caesar was going to cause the downfall of Rome because he was too ambitious, which is ironic because Caesar's death led to a string of unfit leaders, and civil unrest that eventually led to the downfall of the roman empire. Brutus was also focused on preventing corruption. “The name of Cassius honors this corruption,/ And chastisement doth therefore hide his head (IV.iii.15-6)... Remember March, the ides of March remember./ Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake” (IV.iii.18-9).
he killed Caesar because Caesar was going to lead rome in the wrong direction. he lied to his fellow leaders of Rome because it was the only way he knew how to make is home Rome the greatest city. as stated
Brutus realized the great harm Caesar could bring to Rome if the was crowned king. Although Brutus was easily persuaded by Cassius to go as far as committing a murder, Brutus did it because he thought that it was the best for Rome. Brutus does what he thinks is the absolute best for Rome which really shows his great honor and
When we first started watching and reading Julius Caesar, from his first appearance openly displays a surprisingly nature but also from the beginning he displays a natural tendency as well. When Caesar first went to battle I thought that was very brave of him to stand up like that just to protect his Home of Rome, so I don’t understand why were the conspirators so Julius even though Caesar was a demi-god but Caesar has a team arrogance, but as Caesar returns everyone is chanting his name “Caesar, Caesar,” the people want him to be King but he denies the crown3 times All the conspirators, except the noble Brutus, kill Caesar because they feel threatened by his power. Brutus is the only conspirator who murders Caesar for more honorable reasons.
Caesar is brought to the senate where he eventually is stabbed by the conspirators, his friends, his allies, and the people he trusted. The conspirators didn’t think of the reproductions of their actions and they have now started a war. They lose the battle against Mark Antony, some conspirators commit suicide, and some are executed. Shakespeare wanted us to develop sympathy for Julius Caesar through the betrayal of his friends, his overthrow of power, and the ultimate death of his once friends.
Brutus is without a doubt the most noble character in this play. Nonetheless, his impeccable sense of morality also blindfolds him to other people’s sordid motives and makes him easy to be manipulated. Indeed, Brutus is easily manipulated by Cassius in Act 1, Scene 2. In hope to convince Brutus to join the conspirators, Cassius says “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings” (1.2.150-152). As a result, Brutus starts to believes that it is his job to murder Caesar, as he says in Act 2, Scene 1: “It must be by his death: and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general” (2.1.14-16).