Today, I am going to tell my side of the 1972 Buffalo Creek Disaster case as I interned for Arnold & Porter. As an intern, I shadowed Gerald M. Stern during the lawsuit. Needless to say, I was experienced several events that I applied concepts of business law to. The Buffalo Creek Disaster was an incident that occurred due to Dam Three failing at the Buffalo Mining Company’s location in West Virginia. This incident killed one hundred twenty-five individuals, injuring one thousand twenty-one citizens, and left four thousand homeless. With Stern as the leader, my firm acquired the task of representing the plaintiffs who were affected by the catastrophe. After the lawsuit was settled, Stern wrote a book on the case, which I will reference from …show more content…
This was due to the fact that Pittston was wealthier and the case would be more successful in federal court. In Stern’s book, The Buffalo Creek Disaster, he stated, “If the plaintiffs were to sue Buffalo Mining Company they could only do it in state court, however if they went after Pittston they could use in either state or federal court” (Buffalo Creek Disaster, Gerald Stern, pg. 13). In order to pierce the corporate veil, our firm needed to prove that Pittston was over involved within the operations of the Buffalo Mining Company. From the documents that we acquired from Pittston, we were able to prove …show more content…
Our firm wished to sue in federal court rather than West Virginia state court. Stern described our reasoning for this as “Coal companies have more influence on West Virginia state courts than they do with less political federal courts” (Buffalo Creek Disaster, Gerald Stern, pg. 13). During my undergraduate business law course, I learned that “State court judges are elected and generally support companies who create jobs for their state” (Bock, Lecture notes on The American Legal System, pg. 6). Professor Bock described the different jurisdictions as, “State courts have jurisdiction over all cases that are not in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts and for a case to proceed in a federal court, there must be federal subject matter jurisdiction” (Bock, Lecture notes on The American Legal System, pg.
Legal Brief for Andrew Carnegie As the prosecutor of Andrew Carnegie, I would like to state the reasons of why Carnegie should be found guilty of being a robber baron. Carnegie’s refusal to raise worker’s pay by 30% after the company’s profited have increased nearly sixty percent lead to one of the most serious strike in the United States history, the Homestead Strike. Carnegie was also a member of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club, which was blamed for the Johnstown flood that killed over two thousand people. Lastly, Carnegie was one of the many companies that utilized the vertical integration strategy which drove many smaller companies out of business with marketing tactics that were considered unlawful.
The Remembrance Of The Hurricane Creek Mine Disaster December 30, 1970 is the day everything changed for 39 families in the small town of Leslie County, Kentucky. The Hurricane Creek explosion was the most deadly coal mine disaster in eastern Kentucky history, and remains the most lethal mining disaster in America in the last 45 years(Lexington Herald Leader). The Hurricane Creek mine disaster was very devastating for the families, friends, and the one man that lived that day. The coal mines play a huge role in the job industry in Kentucky. This tragedy caused the whole company to shut down, which put a lot of people out of work.
(2015). Gregg v. Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/428/153? Lectic Law Library.
David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.
In her response lecture, Professor West identifies two very significant inconsistencies in Dr. Scott's lecture on the Judiciary. Professor West says, "You can tell a lot about a teacher by what they lecture. You can also tell a lot about a teacher by what they don't lecture or what they leave out"(West, 2:27). This idea is very apparent when it comes to Dr. Scott's lecture. Not only does Dr. Scott leave out some very vital information in his lectures, but he provides misinformation and makes contradictory points in his lecture.
This book was published in 2000 from Princeton Publication and republished in 2011 with a new preface. Mary L. Dudziak, the author of the book, is a legal history professor at Emory University. Most of her work sets American
High winds along with high profile vehicles were a recipe for disaster Tuesday morning in the Antelope Valley. At about 10:15 a.m. all exits to Mojave from State Route 58 were closed to all traffic. Just after 10:30 a.m., according to the California Highway Patrol, all northbound State Route 14 lanes from West Avenue D, between Lancaster and Rosamond were closed as gusts of nearly 80 miles per hour wreaked havoc causing several big rigs to topple over. Fire officials said Tuesday morning that a total of 14 were overturned south of Mojave and four overturned big rigs on State Route 58 and State Route 14.
In the case of Cohen v. Virginia, the case concerned the legality of lottery tickets, between the state of Virginia, and a private citizen, Cohen. With the influence of the Supreme Court, it was deemed that the Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction over state court cases when federal questions were involved, leading to the dedicison that federal judiciary possessed the power to review and overturn court decisions made by state courts (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826). This process was established as the prinicple of judicial review. In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, a dispute occurred between two individuals, Gibbons and Ogden, both steamboat operators. The dispute arose over the usage of waterways between the states of New York and New Jersey.
This case affirmed that states are bound to federal courts and that they cannot nullify a federal
According to Danforth, “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between” (Miller, 182)
The Buffalo Creek Disaster written by Gerald M. Stern helped me understand the different decisions a lawyer must go through to help their clients. The Buffalo Creek Disaster was a man-made disaster that occurred in February 1972. The Buffalo Creek Mining Company’s coal waste refuse pile collapsed, leaving over 125 people dead and 4,000 people mentally distraught. The Arnold & Porter law firm was reached out to by survivors for help and Gerald M. Stern was appointed as the lawyer for the case, who eventually won $13.5 million for the survivors.
The structure of the book has placed it at the top of the reading list for aspiring law students. It effectively maps out the Supreme Court’s ruling history and also the crucial turning point of progressing American civil liberties. Robert F. Kennedy commented on Gideon’s perseverance stating, “If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of
Johnstown flood is a non-fiction book written by David McCullough. It details the events of the May 1881 flood in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. The flood devastated Johnstown and resulted in 2,209 deaths. The cause of the flood was the rupture of the nearby Three Mile Dam. The dam was known to the people of Johnstown as the “South Fork dam,” which is the term that will be used in this paper.
At last, under Justice Dominique Brommel, the case was taken to Burnswick and Burnswick’s attorney of lawyers. It was then forwarded to the Supreme Court. Justice Brommel, the prosecutor , was an idle city lawyer a year ago. He was now