Richard Seng Professor Franks AAS 33B May 1, 2016 California Propositions The three of the propositions that were passed in the 1990s were targeted towards the minority groups in California. Proposition 187 denied illegal immigrants from accessing public services, Proposition 209 which prohibited special treat towards a person due to their race and gender in public institutions, and Proposition 227 which changed the way that non-English speaking students were taught in public schools. These policies were legalized by voters, in order to alienate illegal immigrants and non-English speaking groups, so they can either fit in the American society, or just try and drive them out of the state completely. These ideological trends and anti-immigrant campaigns were designed by the right-wing Americans and the Republicans in the state of California, in the hopes of reducing the amount of immigrants in California. With these three propositions, it has created an outcry for all non-native English speakers, due to the fact that they were being treated differently for being a different ethnic race. …show more content…
To prevent this from happening, the state has passed Proposition 187 in California, in order to fight against the millions of illegal immigrants that were living in the state. The Proposition prevented undocumented illegal immigrants and their children from all public benefits, such as education and health care. It was also required for schools to do a background check on all students and their parents, in order to verify to see if they were a citizen or an illegal immigrant [1]. The state was trying to combat against the illegal border-crossings between Mexico and
In order to protect the white working class, racial laws were created and directly targeted towards Chinese immigrants to protect their whiteness. Chapter seven explains the new threat of the arrival of Japanese immigrants in California. During the beginning of the anti-Chinese sentiment and white working-class racism, Japanese immigrants were also under the romanticized belief of
In 1978 a group of California residents and businesses decided to pass a proposition that would reduce the overall tax rate for all local governments. The Ambivalent Legacy had California citizens and legislatures took a vote which lead to the passing of Proposition 13. Proposition 13 increased all states and local tax it also reduced property tax rates on homes, businesses and farms by 57% this was a great impact on not only California but as well as the United States. California passing proposition 13 socially impacted America by being named the “People’s initiative to limit property taxation”. It was called this because proposition 13 was an Amendment of the constitution of California.
In the article Hispanic Team Changes Small Town Attitudes, by William L. Holmes, many things stood out to me. First of all, I think the race of the players can matter, especially in this era we’re in. Some races, such as Hispanics, tend to have a bad reputation, in the article it referred to the people in the stands calling them stupid, and mocking Spanish accents, just because they were Hispanic. I think the race can matter a lot, especially if you live in an area, that’s predominately another race. This can cause many problems in a community, if not addressed right away.
This is due to a vote that made it possible for the vast Latino population in Salinas to obtain representation to the point of taking over local government. Salinas Valley has been shaped dramatically in the time before and after the major switch to district elections from at-large elections. Traditionally, the Latino population was largely underrepresented in local government, despite their makeup in the population. Thus, their role in the Salinas and Monterey County local government has made an enormous impact
Unfortunately Plyer has faced two main challenges. These attempts to circumvent the ruling provided. In 1994, Proposition 187 was the rise of anti-immigration right to receive public services, such as healthcare and education. It was overturned as it was in conflict with the Plyer ruling. Again in 1996, The Illegal Immigration Reform Act at 1996 “attempted to introduce an amendment that would overturn Plyler by granting states the ability to shut out unauthorized immigrant children from public education.
Brown’s bold statements are an attempt to bestow his audience with a logical appeal, by providing statistical evidence regarding the foreign-born citizens in California. However, because Brown did not cite or reference any credible sources, he could not relate this statement to the exact number of illegal immigrants currently residing in California, who are not paying their taxes, the speech omits to astonish the audience. Later, Brown quotes he has “Provided health insurance to over five million Californians”, followed Martin 2 by… “Raising Minimum wage, reducing prison overcrowding and reestablished the system of crime and punishment, making California the universal leaders in the fight against climate change, passing a water bond, and establish a rainy day fund” (Gajanan 1). Although these benefits were much needed for the five million Californians, Brown is not sure how the funds for these benefits are acquired and who for sure is paying it. He omits how this issue will personally effect the taxpayers who already own health insurance.
In a country like America where people all over the world come to obtain a better future for themselves and their children there is a large diversity with culture and languages. Most immigrant families comes to American speaking a different language and have to adapt to the American language, English. However some people don’t learn English or have difficulty learning it. Usually older people have difficulty learning English or just don’t have time, on the other hand children are sent to school where they are taught English. In this situation children now have to learn a new language and keep their native language.
A community against it formed and started lynching violators of their rules. The civic order being made in California became more and more difficult as it became more diverse. Anglo bigots wanted a stop to immigration. This Anglo-centric idea was especially directed at the Chinese nationality. Though Chinese leaders spoke out against the mistreatment, racial violence continued.
During the 1980s, six million immigrants from Latin America and Asia immigrated to California. This, in effect, had a great impact upon the development of cities, such as my hometown, Rowland Heights, which has a predominantly Asian American and Latino community. For instance, if you drive down Colima Road, you are greeted by a row of ethnic stores and restaurants that proudly display their names in their own language. Three years ago, I read an article about Monterey Park revising an ordinance that would make the use of Latin characters on signs mandatory, which caused anger in the community due to its similarity to an issue from the 1980s. I remembered this story when I noticed that many signs in Rowland Heights showcased foreign languages.
There are an abundance of different nuances and differences to what can be collectively called the American identity, but what about the American spirit? The American spirit values the hard working and industrial attitude that constitutes the foundation of the American Dream; so long as you are willing and able to put all your energy and focus into tackling the day’s challenges, then you will be able to claw your way to the top: being able to live a better life than your parents. Teresa embodies these aspects to the letter. Her family consisted poor immigrants who had escaped from the violence of the Balkans (make clear only majority of life was spent here). Even though she lacked a material advantage, she constantly studied to achieve top
What is Prop. 13, and how has it affected California's tax base? Should California modify Prop. 13, if so, how? In the past Proposition 13 benefited individuals, businesses, and other tax base but today that is no longer the case.
It is appalling how much an undocumented person from another country can benefit from the United States government programs at the expense of tax paying citizens. We should be taking care of our own legal, tax paying citizens first and foremost. We already have a law in place for immigrants. It should be mandatory that anyone entering the U.S. must follow the law to the letter. They should become legal citizens before they reap the benefits of any government funded program.
Have you ever felt like you feel pressure by making decisions which then would affect others or the situation? Let me explain how the congress and the president are dealing with the Dreamers, as well as deportation. An article quoted from the president that states, “DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me, I will tell you. To me, it's one of the most difficult subjects I have because you have these incredible kids,” Mr Trump said in February, less than a month after taking office. “We're gonna deal with DACA with heart"(Alexandra Wilts).
In states like Arizona, the program SB 1070 allowed state officials to profile individuals who presumed to be residing in the state without legal documents. Needless to say, this was a tool used to regulate migration and also a way to differentiate legal residents from illegal residents, which resulted as an inhumane and degrading way to treat these individuals. For that reason, it has become unreachable for immigrants to assimilate into our American society because they are characterized as either aliens, criminals, or
Very few people know that Oregon is a very racist state, and has created multiple laws in order to keep the state as white as it possibly can. One way of doing that was when Oregon first became a state and immigrants were coming to lie here for new opportunities, Oregon only allowed those who could assimilate to American ways and considered more desirable races over the undesirable races. Such as anyone from Germany or Scandinavia because anyone from those areas was viewed as the “self-image of Americans and Oregonians.” In Oregon, there have been similar views on immigrants of that are Asian and Latino, such as both are considered economical threats for different reasons.