Imagine a family member of yours got framed with something he didn't commit and sentenced to capital punishment, how would you feel? The capital punishment has been thrown back and forth with the argument that it is, or it is not an acceptable way of punishing. Offenders are doing what they know best, breaking the law, but the government instead of fixing the problem by doing something better, the make it worse by taking another life from society, which can be considered a "crime." The capital punishment is currently being used by thirty-four out of the fifty in the United States. Capital punishment often establishes the question, "Does the government have the right to take away someone's life?" When capital punishment claims another life, …show more content…
Most places on earth have abandoned the capital punishment except industrialized countries and others that just refuse. The capital punishment is so outdated that "Almost all democracies in the world have abandoned the capital punishment. The U.S., Japan, and South Korea are the only exceptions" (http://www.religioustolerance.org). Condemning somebody to death row can also take someone's life by mistake. If the one being accused did not commit the crime, and has no way to prove it at that time, justice can be wrongly brought. David Von Drehle stated, "Incompetent investigators, using discredited science, sent two men to death row in Texas for alleged arson murders" (http://time.com). The capital punishment as said before is a risk because somebody can die when they were innocent. David J. Burge stated "Capital punishment runs counter to core conservative principles of life, fiscal responsibility, and limited government. The reality is that capital punishment is nothing more than an expensive, wasteful and risky government program" in his article the death of the capital punishment in …show more content…
David B. Muhlhausen stated, "Some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties – up to and including life sentences or even death. Most Americans recognize this principle as just" (http://www.usnews.com). As stated, certain crimes are so horrendous that the only way to "solve" the problem is by the applying the capital punishment. http://www.usnews.com said, "In short, capital punishment does, in fact, save lives. That's certainly not to say that it should exercise with wild abandon". What this means is that by getting rid of the threat, which is the murderer, a crime could be stopped before it begins. However, this is not to say that just because somebody committed a crime, they should be sent to death row. Robert Blecker stated, "Vicious murderers, who prey on the helpless and vulnerable, once captured, become perfectly well behaved ‘inmates' they get transferred from maximum- to medium-security" in his article "The Death Penalty Needs to Be an Option for Punishment" in http://www.nytimes.com. When actual, dangerous criminals are sent to jail instead of capital punishment their personalities transform. They become better persons and slowly work their way into having fun or even back to the open
For example, Turow illustrates that even people, who show anger towards the hideous crimes, still criticize the punishment, questioning the government capacity to distinguish between the innocent and the guilty. Furthermore, “in the last decade the murder rate in states without the death penalty has remained consistently lower than in the states that have had executions.” (Turow 2003) He includes that to show that the system is faulty and not essential because it doesn’t discourage criminals. Also, he points to the fact that Illinois, which has a capital penalty, has a higher death rate than Michigan, which doesn’t apply the penalty law, even though both of them have similar racial makeup, income levels, and population arrangement between cities and rural areas. Moreover, he argues against the belief that “death penalty saves money, because it avoids the expense of lifetime incarceration”, (Turow 2003)
Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Capital punishment is typically considered as a human way to approach to kill the most wickedness criminals and to discourage others from carrying out intolerable crimes. However, the unrestrained expenses of capital punishment cases have states thinking about whether it's justified regardless of the price tag. The lethal established ailment in the discipline of death is that it treats 'individuals from mankind as nonhumans, as articles to be toyed with and disposed of. It is along these lines conflicting with the essential reason of the Clause that even the most awful criminal remains a person had of normal human respect.
Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.
While there are far more subjects to discuss regarding to this issue, I feel it necessary to state that I believe the death penalty should exist in a perfect society. I believe that certain crimes and certain situations warrant the punishment of death. However, the our society is not perfect. The justice system has failed to fairly use this punishment in far too many instances, and concludes that they cannot justly wield this
There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.
California for example are making the moves to put it on their state ballot. Which has something to do with all of filing and paperwork that goes on pre, during, and post-trial. In terms of money being spent the California Commission found that with California’s current death row populations prices may rise to 63.3 million dollars a year. Maryland and Connecticut have made moves to get it removed from their states all together. The U.S. is the only western democracy to use the death penalty.
Former Harris County District Attorney Johnny Holmes sought the death penalty as often as possible. It is record that after he left the office the number of death sentences as reduced drastically. The reasoning makes sense because of course the elected officials are here to serve the public, however they should not allow their egos and personal career stand in the way of giving out proper sentences to those that are
Capital punishment has been used in the US since before its independence from England, however, in 1972, capital punishment was suspended because in the Furman v. Georgia case, the Supreme Court found that the death penalty was being imposed in an unconstitutional manner (“United”). This ruling never governed that the death penalty was unconstitutional, so in 1976, it was re-instituted into the United States as a result of Gregg v. Georgia. Worldwide, 22-36 countries actively practice capital punishment, ~103 countries have abolished it, and no other western countries, expect the US, still use it (“Capital”). In the Amnesty International report of death sentences and executions, China’s executions have stopped being counted as, not only
Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.
The only other industrialized democracy in the world that allows capital punishment is Japan according to CNN. Capital punishment should be illegal in the United States, it costs taxpayers millions, makes our country look bad and it doesn't work. Capital punishment is costing everyone in the United States unnecessary money. According to deathpenaltyinfo.org, every prisoner on death row costs a whopping $90,000 more per year than a normal prisoner. This money is coming directly from your tax dollars.
Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.
The planned execution of prisoners on death row continues to be a political and social issue of capital punishment around the world, but most particularly in Asia, where it is still being widely used. According to Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, 13 countries of Asia: China, India, Japan, North Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and others still retain the death penalty for ordinary
And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Claims that each execution deters a certain number by social of murders have been thoroughly discredited by social science research.” Not to mention, but along with not repressing crime, the death penalty has been proven to be racially