Capital Punishment in America
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, has been a part of the American legal system since the 18th century. However, the death penalty has been widely debated as times have changed. In fact, the death penalty was declared unconstitutional and was not used for almost a decade before being reinstated (Keys and Maratea). After its reinstatement, the debate sparked again, and tensions rose in the United States regarding the morality and constitutionality of the death penalty. In response, famous artists began using their platforms to make statements and take a stand against the death penalty. For example, “Capital Punishment,” by Sherman
Alexie, discusses the death penalty from the perspective of a prison
…show more content…
Furthermore, The cook uses his experiences to speak out against the death penalty. Therefore, the poem “Capital Punishment” establishes that the death penalty is immoral and discriminatory.
The poem demonstrates how the death penalty is often based on prejudices by describing a personal experience dealing with capital punishment that evokes feelings of guilt and
Edwards 2 immorality. As the cook prepares the meal, the author repeatedly writes, “(I am not a witness),” showing the cook's disdain for the death penalty (Aexie). Because of this, the author takes a clear stance against the use of capital punishment and wants no involvement in carrying out the death penalty. However, the author is influenced by their personal experiences, leading them to believe the death penalty is typically discriminatory. For example, in the poem, Alexie writes, “You know, it's mostly the dark ones/ who are made to sit in the chair,” demonstrating how the author feels the death penalty is discriminatory (Alexie 6-7). The author also chose to include this detail based on observation and statistics regarding the death penalty during that time
…show more content…
Edwards 5
Works Cited
Abolish the Death Penalty, A Debate. Intelligence Squared US,, 2016.
Alexie, Sherman. “Capital Punishment.” Inlander, Inlander, 24 Aug. 1994, https://www.inlander.com/spokane/capital-punishment/Content?oid=2214517. “Deterrence.” Death Penalty Information Center, 6 Apr. 2023, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/deterrence#:~:text=Deterrence%20is%20probably%20 the%20most,crime%20they%20had%20otherwise%20planned.
“Innocence.” Death Penalty Information Center, 7 Apr. 2023, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence. Keys, David P., and R. J. Maratea. Race and the Death Penalty: the Legacy of McCleskey V.
Kemp. Edited by David P. Keys and R. J. Maratea, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626375130. Nadeem, Reem. “Most Americans Favor the Death Penalty despite Concerns about Its
Administration.” Pew Research Center - U.S. Politics & Policy, Pew Research Center, 13
July 2021,
Edward Koch make it clear that he believes that capital punishment can prevent homicides: “Had the death penalty been a real possibility in the minds of these murderers, they might well have stayed their hands” (484). Koch tries to convince his reader that a strict punishment like the death penalty will definitely force people to think twice before they murder another human being. Koch uses evidence like the murder rate and cases where criminals committed multiple murders to support his defense for capital punishment, and uses the statistics to show how necessary capital punishment is necessary in the United States (485-86). This essay is directed at U.S. citizens how can be persuaded to support or have not yet formed an opinion on capital punishment, so the death penalty can gain supporters and be fully incorporated into the law. He also states that by making murderers pay with their lives, capital punishment makes the value of human life at a higher level (487).
Oshinsky did a remarkable job explaining the history of the death penalty in a clear and concise way. While the text was fairly short, he effectively provided his readers with well documented and relevant information on how controversial the death penalty has been throughout the past few centuries. He undertook an exceptionally important issue that many Americans do not know much about, or may have conflicting feelings
American society has always wrestled with the concept and ethics of capital punishment. Despite the meticulous process involved when convicting someone, there are many questions and exceptions about who qualifies and the process in and of itself, as to be expected when dealing with something so profound and permanent. What if the accused is mentally ill? What if the perpetrator committed the crime when defending someone else? What if the convicted is innocent, but still put to death?
In his article “To Kill or Not to Kill”, Scott Turow tries to convince the audience advocating the capital-punishment system in Illinois to inspect its fairness and efficacy. He tackles this issue because he provides that the system is defective. Even though he goes back and forth from favoring the capital punishment issue to rejecting it, he clearly states his penalty opposition, supporting it with powerful examples, factual data, and a metaphor. To appear moral, credible, and knowledgeable, the author uses his scholarly tone, demonstrating his respectable position. He, as a lawyer and “one… members of a commission appointed by Governor”, had to present his position on the law during the reforms of the capital punishment system in Illinois.
The death penalty has been a controversial topic of debate for years, specifically whether the punishment is ethical and effective. Many have even argued that the criminal justice system has imposed flawed and misguided standards and practices which have caused chaotic conditions to seep into American life. Truman Capote’s work “In Cold Blood” examines the nature of this system by recounting the trail of Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, who had been accused of murdering the Clutter family in rural Kansas. Through Capotes vehement opinions about numerous aspects of the process, the narrative includes a strong implicit answer to the central question of whether society actually achieves justice when it imposes the death penalty. Throughout In Cold
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, and the debate about its abolition is the largest point of the essay written by Steve Earle, titled "A Death in Texas”. This form of punishment should be abolished for 3 reasons; First, It does not seem to have a direct effect on deterring murder rates, It has negative effects on society, and is inconsistent with American ideals. To begin, the death penalty is unnecessary since it is ineffective at deterring rates of murder. In fact, 88% of the country's top criminologists do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to homicide, according to the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. In opposition, supporters may argue that it may indeed help to deter murder rates as they have
Over the past last two decades the support of the death penalty has been declining dramatically in America. In the op-ed article “Most Americans Support the death penalty” published in the Washington Post News on the 17th of April, reporter Mark Berman composes an overview on the feelings most Americans have towards the death penalty. This was accomplished through the division of various sizeable groups between gender, race, and political views. On this specific subject the reporter of this article, Mark Berman, demands that “there is still some risk that an innocent person will be put to death” (Berman, p. 1). Throughout Berman’s op-ed article he portrays his demand through two out of the three appeals, pathos, logos as well as the feedback
The cook in the poem is mocking what people say about executing, “All the stories should be simple. 1 death + 1 death = 2 deaths. Let’s throw the killers in one grave and victims in the other, let's form sides and have two separate feasts. (Alexie 50-52). Alexie shows the results of executing a killer, and shows that the government is just taking more lives than it should be.
Our judicial system should prioritize incarceration and how lengthy a sentence someone should receive based on the crimes committed. The death penalty may claim to serve justice, but its fatal flaws expose a fundamentally broken and
Weil, Jack. “The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crime.” The Death Penalty. Ed.
Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”
There are numerous ways to punish people who are a threat to society without executing them. No matter which way the death penalty is carried out, be it lethal injection, lethal gas, electrocution, hanging, or firing squad, the executioner is always implicated. Bryan Stevenson, a social justice activist, questions, “If it’s not right to torture someone for torture, abuse someone for abuse, rape someone for rape, then how can we think we can kill someone for killing?” (“Delaney” 1). Although executioners are permitted to kill, they are still killing another human being.
A Hanging points out the immorality of the capital punishment when it describes the narrator’s realization of the “wrongness” of the method (Orwell 100) and The Penalty of Death demonstrates its point by telling the audience that the primary concern of the general public when it comes to criminality is to see the criminal “suffer” for his crimes (Mencken 58). Mencken also mentions that execution
Attorneys from both sides of the capital punishment debate were interviewed with one stating “If you are going to kill somebody in the country, don’t be poor.” *6 This opinion was promptly opposed by an Assistant District Attorney who went on to describe the crimes that those on death row had committed. The more people that were interviewed and surveyed the more they began to realize that the American death penalty was filled with
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).