Case Study: People V. Nothnagel

241 Words1 Page

Continuing onto the second case I have researched. This case is titled People v. Nothnagel 187 Cal. App. 2d 219; 9 Cal. Rptr. 519; 1960 Cal. App. LEXIS 1375. This case focused on the event that happened on December 8th, 1960. Nothnagel was charged with “lewd conduct” with a minor that was eight years old. In his case, he attempted to tell the jury that there was some consent in the actions and tried to get a new trial against his conviction. As with the previous trial, the “intent of purpose” comes into effect here. Each person had a slightly different role in acquiring their case, but it still falls under the same offense. They were both charged with sexual assault of a minor, and received due punishment. In conclusion, my experience of

Open Document