There has not been a more controversial court case since O.J Simpson back in 1995. Casey Anthony made a widespread image for herself which is none other than a psychotic mother who did not care for her child Caylee. Previous relations with her father as a child, George Anthony, provide enough information which shows that he in fact contributed to the behaviors Casey exhibited as a young adult. Both George and Lee Anthony, Casey’s brother, affected a proper stimulation for her to experience as a child with consistent sexual abuse and molestation (Gwynne 2011). Due to these experiences as a young adolescent, Casey grew up to believe it is proper behavior to treat children in such a way they are not capable to feel a specific love and affection …show more content…
Cindy and George Anthony had two children, Casey and Lee Anthony. From a general outlook on their household, they seemed normal. Her father worked for law enforcement, but Cindy actually made a large portion of the household’s income (Hewitt, Helling, & Green 2009). Sources claimed that George was a husband who gave in to many of Cindy’s requests and demands (Hewitt, Helling, & Green 2009). Having this example set on a permanent display for years would lead up to the explanation pertaining as to why Casey believes it is she who must be in charge of things. Regardless of periodic family troubles, Casey grew up in a family that did not have issues with an economic status. Others viewed her as being a part of a normal American lifestyle. This all changed when, in high school, instances of lying came about. Casey began to drift farther from the truth, the older she became, and this caused much commotion for those who cared about her. In high school, she lied to both her grandparents and parents over the topic of graduating high school. It took longer than necessary for her to reveal this important bit of information and explain that she had begun to skip classes which brought about a lack of
Judicial History • The petitioner, Jason Lara, was charged and convicted by a jury on two counts of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child (PCSA). Upon conviction Lara was sentenced to consecutive imprisonment of 10 years and 8 years. The Facts • J.O. and C.A. were children of Augustina P. • Augustina worked evenings in which caused her to need a babysitter • Shelly Lara would watch J.O. and C.A. • Jason Lara was the son of Shelly Lara, who stayed with her • On February 11, 2005, Jason told Cordero that once, when Phillip A. came to visit, Jason heard sounds of licking and sucking coming from a room where Phillip A. and J.O. were alone together. • On February 17, 2005, Cordero and Augustina went out for a few drinks after Augustina
Policy Analysis: Megan’s Law Sexual violence, particularly against children, is a significant issue all around the world. In the early 1990’s in the United States, there were multiple well-publicized cases of sexual violence against children. From kidnappings, to rapes, and everything in between, violence was being committed against children and something needed to be done about it. In 1996, Megan’s Law was passed in response to the sexual assault and death of Megan Kanka, a seven-year-old from New Jersey (Corrigan, 2006).
The interview was said to lead us with even more questions than before and that is right. Throughout the interview, Anthony seems so at peace with the situation. Claiming that the never lied about anything, but at times just “didn’t know.” This becomes frustrating as we process this knowledge, it is obvious that Anthony lied about many situations regarding the death of her young two-year old. Also, when Anthony says that she “doesn’t give a sh--” about the opinions that people have of her.
On July 5th, 2011 Casey Anthony was found not guilty for murdering her two year old daughter Caylee Anthony in Orlando Florida. Caylee was found in a trash bag, with duct tape wrapped around her head to cut off air supply. There are many key pieces of evidence in the case that points toward Casey being guilty of the crime. I truly believe Casey killed Caylee, here are a few reasons why.
1. A student who came to the rescue of UBC assault victim testifies The article explores the witness Adam Casey’s experience when a fellow student, Mary Hare, was being assaulted in her dorm. During a chief examination, he stated his actions throughout the whole ordeal. Several panicked women rushed into the residence’s common building and reported the issue, Adam Casey, asked if they’d called 911 and the women responded that they had then he ran to where the assault was occurring.
With all that being said let us take a deeper look at the case and see if the evidence used was enough to get a conviction. It all started on June 16, 2008. Casey had her daughter Caylee with her parents and was saying goodbye to them. She was leaving on work business and was taking her daughter along with her.
Unfortunately high profile crimes are being committed all the time. Thankfully for law and order we are able to limit the amount of times crimes committed so there is less chaos. Even though our government protects the people in every way possible there are still bad people out there that commit mind-blowing scenes and some even get away with it. Often horrible crime scenes depending on the level of shock or harm is exploited throughout the media. Many crimes are made by those who purposely want their crime portrayed all over the media.
Although, the picture the public failed to see at first ultimately led to a harsh and difficult lifestyle for these kids. Both judges were very demanding, for example in cash for kids, judge Ciavarella didn’t put up with any kid. Whether it was a small behavioral offense or a larger criminal offense, he treated it the same. Ciavarella
I vividly recall my mother’s astonishment that I, as a 10 year-old, would be glued to the television set. The Casey Anthony case was aired for years, I was fascinated by how the law worked and the new facts that were discovered that threw the case to one side or another; I felt connected to this case because it was in my home state. My mom never grows tired of telling this story, and with every year passing I know she becomes more and more proud of the little girl who admired the men in blue suits on the screen and decided then she wanted to be a lawyer. I remember watching my mom gaze at me with an amazed look in her eye that I have now grown so fond of.
In November 1997, Casey Martin, a highly talented, professional golfer, filed a suit against the PGA tour. The first hearing took place in the United States District Court in Oregon with a case title Casey Martin, Plaintiff v. PGA Tour, Inc., Defendant (984 F.Supp. 1320). Casey Martin has a rare degenerative circulatory disorder in his right leg that inhibits his ability to walk naturally and can cause severe pain. Martin’s disorder is classified as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. During the 1997 PGA golf tour, Martin was denied a request to use a golf cart during the third round of the tournament to accommodate his special needs.
Psychologist, Patrick Ewing, the author of “Kids Who Kill” provides information that “Knighton has only vague memories of beatings by his father” suggesting that Knighton was always surrounded by abuse (Traver 2). Since Knighton and other kids are raised poorly, it shouldn’t be a shock that they treat others horribly due to their challenging childhood. “Young people committing seemingly motiveless killings were themselves sexually or physically abused,” says Patrick Ewing, suggest that many of these kids are victims to abuse (Traver 2). We see these kids as cold hearted and ruthless when in all actuality, they need help to recover. Only the chance to rehabilitate is offered when it’s to late and they have committed a crime.
The Christopher Vaughn case is a popular case in which ballistics and blood spatter aided in solving. Vaughn pleaded not guilty in court, and the defense stuck to the case that it was a murder-suicide case involving his wife. Paul Kish, a blood spatter expert assigned to the case, said that the evidence found at the crime scene did not correlate with Vaughn’s story. Vaughn’s blood was found in many different places; the center console, on his wife’s shorts, on the front and back of her seatbelt, and on the carpet between her shoes. Vaughn’s original statement did not mention the blood present on the seatbelt.
Jane Roberts case summary Jane Roberts is a single and a beautician. Her father died when she was very young hence raised by an emotionally distant alcoholic mother. All her life, she felt abandoned which led to her drinking from her teenage years. Jane strived for attention and affection from men which lead to sex addiction. She was confused between love and sex.
The Supreme Court of the United States of America in 2012 ruled that juveniles couldn’t be tried as juveniles and be sentenced to life without the possibility of bail, no matter how harsh the nature of the crime committed. Justice Elena Kagan argues that juveniles who commit crimes typically have a rough upbringing or unfortunate circumstances which cannot be controlled by the juvenile. She argues that if they are serving a life in prison without a chance of parole, it causes damage to them psychologically due to the lack of experiences. They will miss the most important moments in life that define who they are as an individual.
Two women from Texas, Andrea Yates, 37 and Darlie Routier, 27 both shocked the world when they brutally murdered their children. Both women were described as wonderful mothers who loved their children, but were also described as having post-partum issues during the last years of their children’s lives. Andrea Yates admitted to her harsh crimes and was willing to take any punishment that was given, as she believed she was saving her children’s souls. On the other hand, Darlie Routier did not admitted her crimes towards her children. Darlie Routier pleaded not guilty, but prosecutors believed differently after many conflicts appeared in her story.