Sophia Pritchard
Mrs. Sherman
Acc. English II Period 6
March 22, 2023
CENSORSHIP ISSUES While reviewing a school newspaper, a principal in the Missouri Hazelwood School district deemed two of the articles too “inappropriate” for publication. The articles were specifically about the effects of divorce and teenage pregnancy on young adults and teenagers. The principal had the articles removed before printing and publication. A group of students filed a lawsuit against the Hazelwood School District claiming that removing the articles violates their First Amendment rights. After some time the case reached the Supreme Court. They determined that the censorship of the kid’s articles was not a violation of the First Amendment and the teachers
…show more content…
The First Amendment does have some recognized exceptions, but none apply to this situation. Censorship is the repression of certain books, music, media, or speech. The First Amendment was made to protect common citizens from being censored by the government, so why do these students not count? Censorship does not benefit children because it threatens the First Amendment, restricts education, and is used for political control. Censorship does not benefit children because it violates their First Amendment rights. Commonly, when the argument of censorship comes up, people fail to mention that students’ rights are being violated. Just like adults, students are human too, and deserve to be treated the same; due to that reason, banning books and media becomes questionable, "The removal of books from public schools libraries involves questions of free speech, because the right to receive expression goes hand in hand with the right to speak freely under the first amendment of the constitution” (Tylor). Although …show more content…
As a child, one of your main goals is to develop, learn, and grow as a person, but when your access to education is limited how are you able to do that? Schools are supposed to provide safe learning environments, this includes safe learning environments for tough subjects like crime or politics. Many people against censorship in schools bring up the fact that schools should be encouraging students to be curious and learn about new topics (Aliprandini and Mcmahon 1-3). This is especially true when it comes to teenagers. Teens are known for making stupid mistakes, as well as life-changing mistakes like teen pregnancy. Censoring topics like sex education or homosexual relationships does nothing but harm. Teenagers are unable to learn about these topics in safe environments and might end up making a life-changing mistake. People might argue that sex education should be taught at home by parents, but how do we know they are correctly educated on the subject, that is, if they even have the talk with their kids. By making sex education a required class, teens are more likely to make smart and informed decisions about their bodies. Not only does it educate them now, it also allows them to grow into smart adults. Moreover, when a group of people removes certain topics from curriculums or bans books it tends to be extremely biased, "In Pico (District vs. Pico) the school board had removed 11
Censorship in schools concentrates on creating a non-beneficial and unhelpful learning environment for students. Americans should be aware that textbooks often only present a positive image of US history because it doesn’t tell the truth about how we came to be as a nation. In Denver, Colorado, students are protesting about a review of the AP history curriculum which
The First Amendment rights of Alex were violated because the school went against his belief of religion and did not allow him to express it. The school administrator tampered with Alex’s First Amendment rights. Quoting from the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
Rule: The Court held 5-4 that no the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing, at or across the street from a school-supervised event, student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting
People wanting to censor books must follow a set of rules. First, they must provide evidence on why they believe this book should be censored. They should have a reason on why the particular novel has a dangerous effect on the youth. Second, they must provide psychological evidence that shows how reading a potential dangerous book could inspire students to flagrantly disregard authority. Although opinion is usually taken from people who frequently read, the issue of censorship should be taken into account from all
People, especially children, are very influential. That is why it is so important to have a diverse array of books in every school library. Reading about minorities, the life experiences of others, and complex topics in general, will make students have a much better understanding of the world around them. This increases the developing social skills in children, and creates an important newfound sense of empathy for the people around them. Some parents believe that if their children read about controversial topics such as drug use, violence, and explicit content, it will encourage them to adopt the habits portrayed in the material that they are
By limiting what children and students can read, the government is also limiting their education and opportunities for personal growth. Children and students should have the right to choose what they want to read and explore new ideas, and they should not be denied access to information and knowledge because of government censorship. The government's attempt to limit what students can read in schools is also a threat to their education and personal freedom. Schools should provide students with access to diverse sources of information and encourage them to explore new ideas and perspectives.
In 1969, the supreme court ruled in the students’ favor, stating that a student’s right to free speech does not disappear when on a school campus. As long as it causes no disruptions at school, students keep their right to free speech. This affects schools in a couple of ways. A student is allowed to exercise their right to free speech on any topic they would like. A school only has the right to put a stop to a student’s free speech when there is evidence that it is affecting school procedures and student learning.
Yes, sometimes censorship might be beneficial, especially in schools, but Ray Bradbury would say no as it silences opinions. Censorship should not be present in adulthood since everyone has different opinions and we need to respect both sides even if we don’t agree with them. Quotes: When Captain Beatty starts yelling at Montag he yells, “What traitors books can be! You use them, too, and there you are, lost in the middle of the moor, in a great welter of nouns and verbs and adjectives”
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Censorship Censorship in schools may not be the best choice for enriching the future minds of the United States of America. Children of the United States of America should have the right to learn about anything for it is there amended right. Taking knowledge away from them and censoring it should not be the answer to keeping our Children pure it should be what we teach our kids. We need to teach them right and wrong that is what will keep our child’s mind pure. Many books are being taken off shelves every day in student libraries because a couple people do not think that the book is suitable for children.
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
Censorship protects kids. In the article entitled “What Children Need is Censorship”, Aric Sigman remarks, “The difference between a child and an adult is that children are more vulnerable to the effects of everything from sunburn and alcohol to ideas and images.” Children are easily influenced most of the time. When they see adults doing things, they wanna do it, too. Sigman also says while free speech may be a laudable aim between adults, the concept is now being used primarily by commercial interests to speak freely to our children.
It is evident that censorship is widely common in school. Some books are banned from school libraries due to content, while others are banned from being read in English classes. "Censorship is particularly harmful in the schools because it prevents students with inquiring minds from exploring the world, seeking truth and reason, and stretching their intellectual capacities, and becoming
“over 1500 books are challenged becuase of “explisit” sexcual content..” (“Banned and challenged books by the numbers”).(12 infographics about banned and challenged books). Books are one of the best sources for information Kids are missing out on the great quality of books that have/will be banned. “Parents who don 't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others. The National Coalition against Censorship explained that "Even books or materials that many find 'objectionable ' may have educational value, and the decision about what to use in the classroom should be based on professional judgments and standards, not individual preferences." [6] In the 1982 Supreme Court ruling on Board of Education v. Pico, Justice Brennan wrote that taking books off of library shelves could violate students ' First Amendment rights, adding that "Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books."
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with