The case I pick was about Chad Heins. He was wrongfully convicted of murdering his sister-in-law in northern Florida. Chad Heins was exonerated on December 4, 2007, due to DNA evidence proving that another man committed the crime. On April 17, 1994, Tina Heins was brutally stabbed to death. Chad lived with his sister-in-law and brother Jeremy. Chads brother was in the Navy and was aboard a ship at the time of the murder. Chad came home that night at 12:30am, which was two hours before the murder. He woke up around 5:45 a.m. to find three small fires about the living room and kitchen. After putting out the fires and disarming the smoke alarms, he discovered Tina in her bedroom stabbed 27 times.
Besides Chad being at the apartment, there was no evidence connecting him in the murder. There was no blood on his clothes, under his fingernails, no scratches or scrapes on his body, and no murder weapon
…show more content…
In 2003, the Innocence Project filed a motion for DNA testing on skin cells collected at autopsy from underneath the victim’s fingernails. Because she has defense wounds on her hands the biological evidence form the attacker could be under her fingernails. She had defense wounds on her hands, meaning that biological evidence from the attacker could be under her fingernails. The DNA test results showed that male DNA under Tina’s fingernails did not come from Chad or Jeremy Heins. Additional testing in 2005 showed that the profile from the hairs was consistent with the DNA from the fingernails, all belonging to a single, unknown male. While preparing for the retrial, the Innocence Project sought further DNA testing on semen from the victim’s bed sheets. DNA test results released in November 2007 showed that the semen came from the same person as the hairs and the cells found under the victim’s fingernails. On December 4, 2007, prosecutors dropped the pending charges against Heins. Chad Heins, 33, had been incarcerated for 13
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
The wife gave her a $1,000 down payment to her daughter's boyfriend at the time, Chad Padgett to make the murder happen.
Ted Bradford and Jeramie Davis are two men out of many that have had their cases overturned my DNA evidence. Ted Bradford served 14 years on a rape charge of a woman in her home with her baby. Bradford's case was the first case in Washington to be overturned by DNA evidence (Bristol). The case was overturned when a University Professor in Seattle, Washington, Jackie McMurtrie, tested the DNA found by the detectives from the Yakima County. This shows that there was a possibility that Bradford did not commit the crime.
Timothy Cole was convicted of Aggravated Sexual Assault on September 17th 1998. Timothy Cole was a 26-year-old young man who used to attend Texas Tech as a business major. While he attended Texas Tech, the police was looking for a serial rapist known as the “Tech Rapist”. It was March 24th 1985 when the crime that wrongfully convicted Mr. Cole occurred. It was a dark night when 24-year-old Texas Tech student Michele Mallin parked her car near a church to get to her apartment.
The documentary, Making a Murderer brought national attention to an otherwise statewide murder case known mainly in the state of Wisconsin. The cases, which both involved the murder of Teresa Halbach, were The State of Wisconsin Vs. Steven Avery and The State of Wisconsin Vs. Brendan Dassey. The handling of the cases is up to debate, especially the verdicts themselves.
In 1993 Maher wrote the innocence project who then helped him fight his case. In 1997 the Innocence project filed a motion for DNA which was denied without a hearing. In 2001 a law student found a box that contained evidence from the lowell cases in the basement of the Middlesex County Courthouse. In the box there were pants and underwear collected from both victims. Both sources of evidence were sent to Forensic Science Associates where the performed DNa testing.
David told the cops that he was in the car when Randal Dale Adams shot the gun. The cops then began to question Randal Dale Adams and had him sign a statement which only stated what the two men had done during the day and that they had passed by where the murder took place and that was a false confession given by Adams. There were also two eyewitnesses who also had claimed to see the car and identify Adams as the person who shot the officer. The police were determined to find the killer because it was one of their fellow officers. When the case went to trial and there was a false confession by Adams, eyewitnesses along with the officer who had been in the car stating that the person who killed her partner had the same color hair as Adam the jury found Randal Dale Adams guilty.
Resulting in Barbour to contact the Innocence Project, which agreed to represent him. In June of 2010, he wasn't informed of his innocence till 18 months later, due to complications of locating him. They finally found the right man who convicted the crime and Barbour was ecstatic that he was finally proven innocent. He was 57 years old.
The defense attorney made a remark stating that there was no substantial evidence to convict his client as his DNA was not present. The prosecutor refuted this by saying “although the defense likes to claim there was no DNA evidence of Mr. Santillan, the tests relied on touch DNA that could have been wiped off”. This meant that there was no substantial DNA evidence that could directly correlate the defendant to the
All of his appeals got denied. Then, his post-conviction lawyers Robert Henak and Stephen Glenn had the DNA evidence tested in 1995. The court shot down the evidence stating that the 3rd set of alleles from the test could have belonged to anyone and didn’t prove Steven’s innocence. Eventually, the Wisconsin Innocence Project got the rape kit tested again. The lab found a rooted pubic hair and tested it.
It was not checked by the police. They made a superficial search of Emma’s room,” ( Lizzie Borden: Guilty or Not?). Throughout the day, the body of Abby had been for the photographer, people entering the crime scene
Davis exonerated from jail and proved him innocent. After serving 18 years in prison, just 2 years short of his sentence, Davis was exonerated and sent home through the innocence project. “Tests proceeded on other crime scene evidence, however, including swabs in the rape kit that contained sperm cells and fingernail scrapings taken from the victim after the crime. The results revealed consistent profiles of two unknown men, excluding Northrup and Davis(“Larry Davis”)”. From this quote, one can conclude that the DNA collected from the rape kit did not match either of the two convicted men meaning they did not commit the crime.
he didn’t even realize it was happening. Alot of people have been exonerated through DNA testing, with 317 such post-conviction exonerations since 1989, according to the Innocence Project. This week, the office of Craig Watkins, the Dallas County district attorney, announced that Phillips, 57, was going
Avery fought several times for an appeal, but each time was denied. Fortunately for Avery, a petition for DNA testing was granted in 1995 and showed that scrapings taken of Beernsten’s fingernails contained the DNA of an unknown person. The tests were unable to eliminate Avery, however, and a movement for a new trial was denied. In April of 2002, attorneys for the Wisconsin Innocence Project obtained a court order for DNA testing of 13 hairs recovered from Beernsten at the time of the crime. The state crime laboratory reported that, using the FBI DNA database, it had linked a hair to Gregory Allen, a convicted felon who bore a striking resemblance to Avery.
According to Howard, being in that kind of shooting environment and get no blood on your body is not possible and lab researchers say that there was no blood on Sarah’s clothes. However, there was DNA found on Sarah’s bathrobe which Howard was unaware of and defense prosecutors in return questioned Howard’s creditability. Howard brought up the issue regarding collecting the evidence and also countered defense by questioning on their integrity on the state’s investigations. Howard’s contributions helped in reopening the case