Prince 1
Chinese Foot binding was a tortuous form of beauty that lasted for around 1,000 years. It was a tradition that lasted far longer than it should have. It was a huge part of Chinese history that is now seen as backward or barbaric. The practice did not end too long ago, as there are still people alive with bound feet. However, many don’t really know what foot binding is. This essay will teach you all about the tragic tradition. This writing was inspired by a quote in The Fifth Chinese Daughter, where food binding is briefly mentioned. In the story, the father writes to his wife, “Do not bind our daughters’ feet. Here in America is an entirely different set of standards, which does not require that women sway helplessly on little feet
…show more content…
The rebellion wanted gender equality amongst other things, but subsided because it wasn’t able to integrate foreign ideas with existing Chinese ones. Many Christian missionaries throughout history opposed and fought against footbinding, and feminists hated it because it caused women to suffer. Writers from New World Encyclopedia that it wasn’t until “1911, after the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the new Republic of China government banned foot binding; women were told to unwrap their feet lest they be killed.” At first it was a big cultural shock, but the ban thankfully is still in place today. Be that as it may, there is still elderly Chinese women out there who still suffer from deformed …show more content…
The tradition of Chinese foot binding caused a horrendous amount of pain, only for the stupid excuse of aesthetics. Foot binding is the practice of breaking and binding the feet to resemble a lotus. It’s widely debated over when and who started it, but it’s certain that the elites in China helped it spread. It started off as something fashionable and morphed into it being
Prince 6 almost enforced. There have been many strange beauty trends among many cultures. A recurring theme in these trends involve body modification, in order to make the body look “beautiful”. Most people today won’t find lotus feet precious as people once did, so will people of the future find the beauty standards of today bizarre? Will we be seen as backward? Beauty is always changing with the times, but one thing stays the same—Beauty is
They came to the conclusion to “Reduce feudal exploitation by the landlords, support civil liberties, political rights, and economic rights of the peasants in order to improve their living condition and enhance their enthusiasm for the Anti-Japanese War” (Doc 5). This would further the popularity of the Communist Party along with bringing equality for peasants. A reaction to this would be the sense of equality that peasants got and they were put in, “a position to challenge the landlords and moneylenders in the countryside,” (Doc 6) in hopes of receiving what they deserve. Along with having an increase in equality for peasants, women were given more rights than they had ever had before. The Marriage Law of 1950 in China gave women the opportunity for a relatively easy divorce, ended concubines and child marriages, gave widows permission to remarry, equal property rights for men and women, and, “was based on the free choice of partners, on monogamy, on equal rights for both sexes, and on the protection of the lawful interests of women and children” (Doc 7).
According to the article “The Body as Attire: The Shifting Meanings of Footbinding in Seventeenth-Century China”, the writer claims that there is no neutral knowledge about footbinding because most footbinding in the past was colored by China’s search for a male identity under the harm of imperialism. The act of footbinding not only kept women in a hobbled and subservient domestic, but also rendered women to satisfy certain abnormal erotic fantasies of men. The article also talks about when and why footbinding appeared in China. It mentions that footbinding is kind of the signal of genteel status in early ancient time, and was promoted in the late Ming and prohibited during early Qing period. Footbinding was looked as an expression of Chinese
In the article Beauty Standards by Kate Povey, she tells us how beauty standards have changed and how they have affected more people today. “Beauty standards have always been extremely prevalent throughout human history, and today they drastically affect everyday interaction, the media, and the commercial world.” (Povey) This quote shows how beauty standards are still an issue today, especially because of social media. On social media, anything can be edited to make you look differently.
They abolished their laws in effort to win back the support of highly valued Chinese subjects. Chinese women were too having a tough time as well. They were dealing with maul practices such as foot bindings. This was a terrible practice which was extremely painful. They would take a girl as young as 4 years old and purposely break their feet.
During the rule of Qin Shi Huangdi during the Qin dynasty, China’s government was based upon the philosophies of legalism. Legalists believed that all people were created amoral, and morality could only come from harsh punishments in society. As punishments, hundreds of thousands of peasants were forced into slave labor. Due to the extreme conditions, many slave laborers died from malnutrition and exhaustion. Today, China is still one of the most frequent instigators of human rights violations, which can be described as the deprivation of the most basic rights that all people are entitled to on birth.
Nowadays, society is obsessed with the way our body looks because it is now used as a way to portray what is on the inside. The ideal body image is socially designed as the ultimate goal that one can attain in order to fit-in and be acknowledged in today’s society. The image that society has on the “perfect body” that has been gathered through media, ads and culture, is something that most people have started to “idolize” and are setting
To balance this out, an expression of patriarchy was created known as foot binding. Foot binding was cruel and unusual punishment that led to the loss of the income generated from silk. It also served to help distinguish Chinese women from Barbarian women. Over time, foot binding became a way of acceptance for women. It was also associated with new ideals of beauty.
Confucian ideas highlight the need to have a heir, thus the Emperor need to be sexually active, which explains the very large number of women in the inner court. However, according to Confucian ideals, the Emperor was not supposed to retain any pleasure from this encounters. therefore leading to a paradox hard to overcome by the Emperor and even harder to enforce by the outer court officials depute their moral concerns. Song women were also granted for the first time considerable legal rights. In fact, Song Dynasty is seen as a high point for women property point in China, further challenging Confucian traditional patrilinality.
The men were still known as leaders and women were to follow. Unlike the South Asian civilization, Chinese widows were legally allowed to remarry but it was extremely frowned upon. “To walk through two courtyards is a source of shame for a woman” (Strayer, p. 255). This enforced patriarchy lead to food binding in women which was related with feminine beauty and eroticism. Foot binding also kept the women constrained to their homes where they are said to belong (Strayer, p. 255).
Make-up, trendy clothes, hair dyes, and cosmetic surgery can be utilized in order to obtain a warm sense of belonging. Seeing forms of artificial beauty as one of the main keys in being included exerts that people tend to value artificial beauty over natural beauty, as they overlook inner beauty characteristics such as loyalty, friendliness, and confidence. However, some members of today’s society believe that natural beauty is regarded more highly than artificial beauty. Many new models have gained popularity for embracing the physical effects
This constant fixation on physical perfection has created unreasonable beauty standards for women, ones we cannot possibly achieve on our own. Such standards permeate all forms of popular media, particularly fashion magazines and advertisements. Women are bombarded with the notion that we must be thin in order to be desirable. These images project an
In ancient Chinese societies, women learned their roles under the influence of men. The men used several different tactics in order to maintain their power and authority over the women. One such practice involved foot binding. In an article about Chinese culture and its history, Donna Drucker writes that foot binding was designed to weaken but also beautify women. The typical length of a “beautiful foot” was about four inches (Drucker).
Just because men prefer women with small feet, they have to bind their feet so tight together, so tight that after their bone and meat became weird shape.
Has society really made humans think that beauty is the ultimate answer to life? Unfortunately, beauty is a major distraction to everyone, especially women. In the essays, “The Ugly Truth about Beauty,” written by Dave Barry and “A Woman’s Beauty: Put Down or Power Source?”, written by Susan Sontag these writers describe what beauty is all about in women’s eyes but with different views and cultures. Men seem to have a different perspective on beauty. It seems that women are more pressured to look a certain way in order to feel accepted by society.
One of the categories in being the ideal woman is being conventionally beautiful because, according to the media, a significant portion of a woman’s self-worth rests in appearance. This can be seen through women’s magazines in particular, which promote altering one’s appearance leads to the significant improvement of one’s “love life and relationships, and ultimately, life in general” (Bazzini 199). Therefore, the media presents a direct relationship with beauty and success: the more attractive a woman is, the better her life will be. Thus, a woman must the take initiative to look beautiful in order to be successful. Through the repetitive exposure of the same type of image in the media, what society considers beautiful often resembles a definitive checklist.