In the early half of the 19th century, the differences between the North and South resulted in the Civil War. The major difference between the two was that the North was anti-slavery, and the South was pro-slavery. Since the difference between the two territories was so drastic, it is safe to say that slavery was the overarching cause of the Civil War. The outburst of the Civil War was built on the frustration of the poor treatment of slaves, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In the South, a central reason for slaves was so that they would help maintain a landowner’s planation. This was great for the landowners because they were able to get mass production of goods while not paying for the labor that goes into it. The problem in this was that …show more content…
The Kansas-Nebraska Act states that people in Kansas and Nebraska can decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery in that specific state. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise, which prohibits slavery north of latitude 36 ° 30’. The Kansas-Nebraska Act infuriated many people in the North who considered the Missouri Compromise to be a long-standing binding settlement. On the other hand, in the South, this Act was strongly supported. After this act was put into affect, both pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers immediately rushed into Kansas to vote in the first election. Pro-slavery supporters had been carrying the election, but soon were charged with fraud by the anti-slavery supporters. Soon after, the anti-slavery supporters held another election, but the pro-slavery supporters refused to participate. The conflict between the two created a division within Kansas, therefore creating two legislatures in the territory. Soon after, violence struck Kansas. The Kansas territory had earned the nickname "bleeding Kansas" as the death toll rose. Finally, another election was called. Pro-slavery supporters won, and were once again charged with election fraud. As a result, Congress did not recognize the constitution adopted by the pro-slavery settlers and Kansas was not allowed to become a state. Eventually, however, anti-slavery settlers outnumbered pro-slavery settlers and a new constitution was drawn up. Just before the Civil War, Kansas was admitted as a Union state. This infuriated the Confederate states, which soon resulted in the declaration of
This shows that the states had no right to get out of the union, which was forbidding the state’s rights which texans certainly wanted. So, this caused the Civil War. Furthermore, sectionalism was also one of the causes of the Civil War.
Throughout all of history, it has been perceived that slavery was at the forefront of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery may be the common perception of why the war was fought, but in reality
The Kansas-Nebraska Act would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had been keeping the union from falling apart for 34 years. Almost all of the Southern Whigs voted for the bill and all of the Northern Whigs opposed it. This caused there to be conflict and no agreement could be found, thus causing the Southern Whigs to be known as Democrats and the Northern Whigs to stay Whigs. It had split up the Whigs and Democrats to form a new party; the Republicans. They were anti-slavery.
“It is good that war is so horrible or, we might grow to like it”-Robert E, Lee. Lee is saying that Texans didn’t want to go to war, but their willing to do it for their state’s rights. Events that lead up to the war was when Abraham Lincoln got elected because he was anti-slavery President, and he wanted to end slavery in the united states. Texans fought in The Civil War, to protect states rights, Texas secession, and slavery.
Missourians then began to flood Kansas, resulting in a pro-slavery majority in the territory legislature, resulting in Kansas becoming a legalized slave state. This outraged the Free states and caused them to elect their own delegates to the constitution convention in Topeka. They tried to petition congress for statehood, and President Pierce denounced the Free State group. Pierce also sights them as traitors, showing he is backing pro slavery territorial legislature. When this happened the pro slavery marshal assembled a large posse to arrest them.
In Document 7 we’re provided with a map that tells us what states are free states as well as what states are slave states. This map also shows us the territory of where the Kansas-Nebraska Act would take place. In the document it explains to us that the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed and the Missouri Compromise was repealed. This meant that the territory was to be held on popular sovereignty. Both the North and South jumped on this opportunity to claim the territory, and this eventually resulted in conflict between the North and South.
The event known as the Civil War had redefined the means of being a American. The actions that happened during the war helped that because of the conflicts that made the war occur. The South wanted to keep the slaves, but the North wanted the slaves to be gone and for everyone to have basic human rights, which became controversial and problematic. They divided into states, one that wanted to promote the slavery and one who wanted no slavery at all and became anti-slavery, but why did they decide to fight over it?
Ultimately, Kansas was admitted into the Union as a free state; the decision was admired by Northerners who fought for the prevalence of free states in the
The extremism among abolitionists was noted by the Whigs, and these abolitionists frequently looked to Uncle Tom’s Cabin as a spark for why their movement was so necessary. Uncle Tom’s Cabin, as portrayed in document 2, showed the harshness of slavery and is regarded by many as a cause of the war. Furthermore, the extreme of both sides was clearly exemplified by Bleeding Kansas, which was Southerens and extreme Abolitionists flocked to Kansas after it was decided it would be a free or slave state based on what the people voted. John Brown roused his followers against the pro slavery groups who had attacked the town of Lawrence and they ended up killing 5 pro-slavery people. Document 6 shows the effects of bleeding Kansas through the eyes of Frederick Douglas; Douglas believed that John
The goal of this act was to make the people of those countries vote and decide to be free or slave. Nebraska is Brown’s birthplace. This solution of Kansas-Nebraska Act failed because it created competition between antislavery and proslavery. Therefore, they established a war and bloodshed between the two proslavery and antislavery. In 1885, a pro-slavery from Missourians came to Kansas; said that they would vote for slave and kill anyone else who do not vote for the slave.
People were tired, fearful, and agitated. It began with the South fearing for themselves, believing that they would be taken over and ruled. Soon the majority of the population would be free states wanting to smother them, and they could not compete. This caused the secession.
Implemented in 1854, this revoked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which forbade slavery in the North. Even though Kansas would not be considered as a Northern state, it became a place of bloodshed as pro- and anti-slavery aspects expanded into the territory, strengthening the rising tension that was already present between the two parties. Pieter Geyl confirms that the North and South were ‘divided by a moral issue of the first magnitude,’ with one party ‘detesting slavery and, the other glorifying it as the basis of its social system.’ ‘Bleeding Kansas’ was an important component in understanding that the different ideologies of slavery between the people of Kansas at this time, resulted in their inability to compensate personal values for communal peace. As this act was aimed to save the North, to unify rather than divide, the Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted in the opposing contention. Reporter William Russell from the London Times had additionally claimed that the ‘tone’ and ‘speech’ of Southerners when alluding to people from the North were said in spite and hostility.
According to the “Kansas-Nebraska Act,” “When the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was passed, the Missouri compromise was repealed (They got rid of the rule). The act organized the Kansas-Nebraska territories on the principle of popular sovereignty” (1). This means that while the new act would allow the people to vote to be a slave or free state this means that the Missouri 36°30 line would be ignored and the North would get angered. It states, “A bitter contest followed between pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters for the control of Kansas. Between 50 and 200 people died during the fighting” (Kansas-Nebraska Act, 1).
The American Civil War played a huge role in our Nation, starting in 1861 and ending 1865. The Civil War determined the life of the Union or freedom for the Confederacy. Numerous issues contributed to the arrival of the Civil War, including slavery, The Dred Scott Decision, States’ Rights, Abolitionist Movement, and The Missouri Compromise. One of the huge issues that contributed to the outbreak of the Union was slavery, which led to secession.
Debates over slavery in the period from 1830 to 1860 played a significant role in leading the United States into the Civil War. The issue of slavery was a major source of tension between the northern and southern states, and it was a key factor in the rising tensions between the two regions. The northern states were largely anti-slavery, and many abolitionists were active in calling for the immediate end of slavery. In contrast, the southern states were largely pro-slavery, and many slaveholders were deeply committed to maintaining the institution of slavery. One of the major debates that contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War was the question of whether slavery should be allowed in the territories acquired by the United States.