Ancient Greece, a thriving country consisting of nearly 100 city states from within. A gem of the Archaic and Classical Greek Era that we have come to discover. While the country thrived, they also had much tension from within caused by its two leading cities, Athens and Sparta. Athens, a democratic and well invested political city found apprehension with their neighboring municipality Sparta, a highly dense military society. Though the two cities shared several traits such as slavery and gradation systeming, they were separated by their political and economic differences. Shown by documents written in the 5th century BCE, both Athens and Sparta had rights for their citizens. However, Classical Athens believed that their laws set the pattern …show more content…
This contrasts the two cities in their perspective of what they need. Sparta powers their army with the number of Helots within the confines of their territory. Athens sees military as important but has almost as many resident aliens in their city as Sparta has natural citizens(Document 6). Looking at a list of imported goods and exported goods into the two cities, you can see how Sparta imports materials needed for supporting an army like iron, ivory,and copper. On the other hand, Athens import necessities in which the need to survive on such as wheat, skins, and salted fish to eat. However, Athens exports many lavish materials like perfume, wine, and jewelry. The difference of trade between the two rivals sets apart a contrasting view of alikeness(Document 7). On a similar note, Aristotle writes of how Athens supported themselves financially for war materials like 1,200 calvary men and 500 members of council to reinforce their government(Document 9). This correlates to a similar degree with Sparta to show that Athens was also involved in war and was prepared if need be to fight against a rivaling city. Looking at the point of view from Aristotle, he grew up with and in the Athenian government but he also grew accustomed to many other regulations from other cities during his travel. However, as he reflects on the preparation made by the Athenians, we can see that it is a fair assessment made by a now well regarded
Zareef Peeroo Tim Bailey October 15, 2014 Athenians vs. Spartans The differences between government, the role of women, and the education status of Athens and Sparta led to similar yet very different societies residing in the same area; therefor I will deconstruct these issues using an analytical comparative framework. In, Athens and Sparta, it shows all the differences between the Athenians and the Spartans. Although the two City States shared a common heritage, their differences grew so large in their own minds that they were ultimately willing to engage in a life-and-death struggle to support their separate realities (Spielvogel).
Camille Sicat #26 3/16/16 Writing/Social Studies Power of the People: Athens vs. Rome Essential Question: Citizenship in Athens and Rome: Which Was the Better System? Prior to the idea of people being “citizens” of a nation, people were subjects, with no rights and forced to serve under the iron fist of their ruler. The idea of people having rights and responsibilities to their country originated in Athens, Greece circa 500 B.C. (Background Essay). Rome, however, far surpassed the Greeks in their social contract theory of citizenship (Background Essay) for the following reasons: 1) More people were considered citizens i.e. females and sons of freed slaves; 2)
Spartan's government structure was considered to be an oligarchy. Sparta enrolled all of its men in a life-time servitude to the military. Athens had a people's court, giving its citizens the right to participate in its legislative process.
These characteristics made Sparta and it’s people stronger, and allowed them to become the thriving civilization we know today. Sparta was a superior model of civilization to Athens because of its strong army, the rights it gave to women, and the fact that it was self-sufficient. Sparta’s structured and beautifully crafted civilization was partily due to their extremely
SParta is superior to athens because its army was fierce and protective, women received some education and had more freedom than any other city state. First, the army of sparta was the strongest fighting force in greece. Beginning at the age of 7, young boys were sent from their families to live in barracks. they were treated harshly to make
These are the similarities and differences between Sparta and Athens. The first difference was that the Athenians focused on the arts rather than military. The Spartans focused on military and boys started military training at seven. All boys in Athens could receive education in a school. Athenians wanted to be well-rounded.
Athens vs. Sparta Whether it's government, education, art, or military, Athens and Sparta have always had many similarities as well as differences in ancient Greece. Sparta and Athens did not share the same view and opinions. As a result of these disagreements, the two ancient Greek city-states were rivals. They both had very different methods of teaching, military training, women's rights, and more. Spartans focused most on the training of war, and Athens focused most on knowledge and intelligence.
Athens and Sparta did many things similarly pertaining to gender roles, but they also did things differently. One such example is that Athens was very restrictive in what they allowed women to do. Athens really put a taboo on women going outside, and doing hard labor. Sparta on the other hand, put an emphasis on women going out, being part of the community, and exercising. However, both Athens and Sparta believed that only men should get to fight in wars, and they both believed that only men should hold leadership
Athens was better than Sparta because, it had a better government, education system, and had more cultural achievements. One element of Athens that made it the better city-state was the government. While in Sparta they had an oligarchy, a form of government in which the government power resides in the hands of select few; however in Athens they had a direct government. Direct government is where all the citizens participate directly in the government, by voting on laws, placement of public works, etc. Instead of a few individuals having a say in what happens, everybody can be heard and have an equal say.
Sparta, which is inland, far from the sea, is a culture of less wealthy peoples with a conservative outlook focused on agriculture and the expansion of land. According to Kidner, Spartans “always were wary of foreigners and new ideas,” showing that the Spartans had a more conservative culture that is not fond of foreigners or change. Athens on the other hand, located on the coast, is a culture of more wealthy peoples that developed an economy focused on trade. According to Kidner, “Athens had the most liberal political ideology of all the Greek cities and was open to ideas about new kinds of government,” showing that the Athenians were more open to foreigners and new ideas, and not as conservative as the Spartans. Athens and Sparta are almost complete opposites, and in the comparison between the two, it is evident that the geographic locations of the two Greek cities adversely influences their
Aristotle once said in his book Politics, “Democracy arises out of the notion that those who are equal in any respect are equal in all respects” (Aristotle). Ancient Greece was ahead of time, so that everyone felt included. Your gender, social position, and religion do not play a part in the amount of rights you have. Greece was split into many city-states, all with their own types of government and differences. Mainly, Athens and Sparta are most well known.
Even to this day, we still use Athens and Sparta’s societal systems and structures because they were so revolutionary. Athens even introduced the idea of democracy, and Sparta had a strong military culture. Although Athens and Sparta were close together, Athens focused on leadership and education while Sparta focused on the military and war. However, due to their different governments and cultures, each has their strengths and weaknesses. However, because Athens focuses on its future leaders, Athens is the better model for a society.
By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other. The growing military and financial power of Athens as well as its policy of forcing smaller city-states to join its Delian League was shifting the prevalent balance of power in Hellas and raising anxiety among Spartans, their allies and neutral cities. Sparta’s decision to get involved
Athens and Sparta The poleis or city-staes dominated Ancient Greece for more than 200 years. Among the many city states that emerged in about 500BC, Athens and Sparta are considered as the most important. Nevertheless, their lifestyles were quite different as Athenians were a group of open and free-thinking people while Spartans were a strong and military-focused group of people.
The Athenian and the Spartan civilizations were very unique and different but the people shared many similar ideas. The Athenians believed that their government was original and that everyone should participate directly in government. On the other hand, the Spartans believed that every man should train for the military. Both the Spartans and Athenians believed in an equal society where the members were devoted to the polis. During this time, Athens supported a democracy.