How much does a professional athlete differ from a college athlete? Is there really any major difference between the two? This discussion has been going on for years, and every time the topic comes up the NCAA reject the idea. The number one response is that athletes get an education for free. Is that really fair? More than a third of the athletes that get a full ride education are going pro. Athletes put all their time and effort into their sports. So athletes have less time to spend on their education. Another aspect to look at is their health and well-being. Being in sports is not the safest thing to do, especially in a D1 program. Even the slightest mistake can end an athletes ' career. Athletes are pushed to the limit every single day, …show more content…
Knowing that the NCAA get billions of dollars of revenue each year, should change your mind about paying athletes. Athletes are the key to the NCAA 's money source. They bring in all the revenue by competing at a high level each and every day. Athletes put all their time and effort into the sport and have nothing to show for it. Except a "good education". Which they barely get to put to use. Ben Simmons, who just came out of college and got drafted by the 76ers. Complained about how unfair it was for the NCAA not to pay its athletes. He talks about the struggles of a broke college student-athlete. How he could not use his god given talent to make money, or his name. The NCAA does not pay their athletes, and they will not let the athletes compete in any competition that they could receive money in or use their own names to make money. It is one thing not to pay the players, but to not allow them to use their talent to make money. The NCAA should not have a say on what they do. Another big thing is that the NCAA will not let trademarks use athlete 's names. Why does it matter if the athletes want to be signed by Nike? If the NCAA is not paying their athletes, athletes should be able to do whatever they want to make money. NCAA should not have a say in it. Another big aspect to look at is the coaches. Some coaches get paid millions of dollars per season. How is it fair to the athletes knowing their coaches make that much, but they do not make a penny. When the NCAA is throwing that much money at coaches, would it not be okay if the player got a couple thousands of
Prior to this, there’s a more authentic comparison when a company builds a factory in an efficient unformed country; paying its workers pennies but making millions while claiming to be doing them a favor by providing a tremendous opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have, stated by Ethan Thomas. The average annual pay for coaches in this year’s NCAA tournament field is around 1.47 million which is based on 62 out of 68 schools in the field on that the U.S today was able to achieve compensation. Thus far the NCAA continues to oppose paying college athletes to which is a hypocritical case. Some people in our society are yet so naïve that they tend to believe on the reason why the NCAA won’t pay college athletes due to their 100 percent commitment to the monetary worth on education and intellectual insight. Perhaps some college athletes might not qualify for scholarships to which they have to endeavor to support themselves through schooling wise.
an extra 50 hours a week totaling over 90 hours that 's the equivalent to working two full time jobs with a side job. if the NCAA payed their athletes it would be good for the competition. The players would spend less time worrying about finances and they would put more work in and perform better on the field and in the classroom. The athletes can 't even use their own name for profit.
According to Nick Baumgardner of MLive, in 1996 there was an allegation that a booster named Ed Martin gave players money, an investigation started and as the investigation progressed they found out that Ed Martin had given Chris Webber $100,000 before he had even committed to the University of Michigan. The University of Michigan had to vacate the National Championship appearance that was during the “Fab Five’s” freshman season and the “Fab Five’s” entire sophomore year due to Ed Martin paying players while they were attending the University of Michigan. I believe all this could have been prevented if we paid college athletes as they should because Jalen Rose who was a member of the “Fab Five” said, “ “I felt like a professional athlete who wasn’t getting paid.” Think about that he was that popular but didn’t earn a $1 from it.
College athletes like most employees work countless hours a week, miss many school days, and put themselves at risk for injury on a daily basis, but unlike regular employees they do not receive paychecks. NCAA players are compensated for their contribution to their universities through scholarships. It is true that most scholarships cover tuition, and room and board but many fail to realize the many other expenses a college athlete may face. These players are working for a multi billion dollar industry which is exploiting them for their talents and they should be paid fairly for their contribution.
The pro athletes get paid for their hard work why don't college athletes?College do as much hard work as the pros but they still do not get paid. They both compete for championships and practice almost everyday. College athletes have to wait to go to the pros to get money when they should get it now. College athletes work on their sport everyday like a job so you should get money in exchange for your work and labor. Athletes need to be healthy but how can they do that without the right food which cost money.
“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
are the only people getting paid while the football, basketball, soccer, tennis players do all the hard work making the NCAA billions of dollars every year studies that were conducted found this to be very disturbing, considering the fact that college football games bring in 10.8 billion dollars a year, college basketball brings in 27 billion dollars a year, and not one football or basketball player sees any money made from the games they slaved over. The reason the people in charge of the NCAA will get away with what they’ve done to players for years on end is because the coaches and other staff are getting paid to shut their mouths and not speak out against the NCAA, because they need a job, these young men and women work so hard throughout their sport seasons with practices, training, conditioning, and games these students athletes need some type of pay and most of all educational help on and off the field to help them do good in school and focus on their passion. Now back to the first point made about the NCAA believing that if they partnered with universities around the world to grant every young man and woman a full scholarship to play sports for their brand and that school then they receive free benefits like a room and board, books
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
It's a controversial topic, whether college athlete be paid or not. College athletes should not be paid. Their scholarships are payment enough, paying them could make the public lose interest in college sports and they earn way more than someone with just a high school diploma. If they were paid, it seems like they'd be benefiting too much.
The NCAA says that they don’t want to pay college athletes because of their scholarships. As the money keeps flowing more and more each and every year, it comes with more arguments about the athletes getting the money that they deserve. Sounds as if college athletes are blindly signing a sheet of paper and the NCAA has an evil smirk saying “You have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into”. A court case had also gone down about a young college athlete and a car dealership. The dealership was using the athletes to make more sales with his cars and was doing behind the athletes back without
Athletes who play football or basketball are at a higher risk of career ending injuries. These two sports are the hardest on an athletes body. Only one out of twenty-five college athletes go pro, so why put your body at risk when you don’t receive anything for doing that and your chances of going pro are slim? A lot of these student athletes are stressed out because of schoolwork participating in a college sport. This is just another reason that these athletes deserve to be
What college athletes don’t understand is that they are getting exposure to getting a professional contract. If that doesn’t work they will always have a college education to lean back on. They give generous scholarships to top student athletes receive, covering their tuition and most
When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.