Hailey Girsch
Rottink
ENG 106
3 February 2023
Text “Colleges Have a Guy Problem” is a digital article written by Derek Thomposon. He created this text to communicate a story through a document. He used many resources and lots of information to type a story that gave accurate information. In order to decipher this text, you must focus and read it to comprehend what he is informing you.
Author
Derek Thompson is 36 years of age. He was born on May 18th, 1989. He is currently unmarried and focused on his schooling. He attended school at Northwestern University and The Potomac School. Thompson is a blogger at TheAtlantic.com and is the staff editor for the business channel. Thompson’s writing focuses on the media industry, economic policies,
…show more content…
He created this to somewhat persuade people to go the other direction with certain statistics, such as the fertility rate decreasing. This article explains his point of view and others perspectives on this issue. This article allows us to understand the reasoning for both his perspective and the people who do not go to college.
Setting/Exigence
This article was created in September of 2021. This article talks a lot about the future and how this can affect things if it happens long enough. Thompson made this article for communities of students on college campuses and possible high school students.
They Say/I Say In the article “Colleges Have a Guy Problem”, there are a lot of they say/I say statements. He uses a lot of other data and information to back up what he is saying. Thompson says, “The story I prefer begins with the economy” (Thompson pg. 4). He then goes on explaining his reasons on why people should go to college. This is an I say statement. It is his original statement that is backed up by facts and statistics to make it true. A they say example from this article would deal with divorces, rising death, and job loss. He uses this statement because he agrees with what Kathryn Edin had
The overall argument and claim are that college shouldn’t be for everyone and Reich throughout the article show what he is talking about by making statements like “not every young person is suited to four years of college. They may be bright and ambitious but they won't get much out of it. They'd rather be doing something else, like making money or painting murals.” and uses his stylistic language to back up the sentence by saying “They feel compelled to go to college because they've been told over and over that, a college degree is necessary.” showing how he understands what teenagers and adults feel when they are pressed to go to college or attend university for something they don't want to do.
They mention on page 209, paragraph 1, that not all college degrees or college graduates are equal and that for certain schools, majors, and occupations, college may not be a smart investment.
Larry Cuban's’ persuasiveness The percentage of U.S students in the age 18-24 enrolled in college has increased from 35 percent in 2000 to 41 percent in 2010, and according to The Washington Post, only 27 percent of college graduates have a job related to their degrees. Forbes.com states that as many as 60 percent of college graduates struggle to find jobs in their field. Larry Cuban debates where college graduates go when they graduate. The article “Why everyone shouldn't go to college” is republished by Valerie Straus, for The Washington Post, and Cuban uses both ethos and logos throughout the article to emphasize his points and persuade the readers, which he does well.
Rhetorical Analysis on “Should everyone go to College?” People always wonder if college is worth it and if the amount made after college outweighs the cost it takes to get into college. Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill provide an effective argument by saying that for most it is wise to go to college because of the Rate of return that college yields and the Variation in the Return to Education. (Page. 208-218)
Because a college education is so important, we must remind people why a college education should be pursued, and the benefits of having one. 2. In paragraphs 4 and 5, Smith presents evidence to support his thesis that a college education is a worthwhile investment. What evidence does he give?
The main point they make is higher education equals higher income. Becker and Murphy point out the difficulties in paying for college, but they look at the returns being worthy
Additionally, Murray claims that money isn't the only important aspect to consider when deciding to go to college, but that "the topic is no longer money but job satisfaction" (Murray 248). Murray discusses how money
It wasn’t until after reading this piece several times that I began encountering flaws within her reasoning. Although I agree with Bird that college is a waste of all these for some students, I also believe that Bird does not provide strong enough evidence to persuade her readers into thinking this. First off, when choosing the material to include in her essay, Bird should have used evidence that contained more certainty in order to solidify her claim. For example, “it is difficult to assess how many students are in college reluctantly. The conservative Carnegie Commission estimates
In the article, “The Problem is that Free College Isn’t Free”, Andrew P. Kelly explains how students are struggling to get into a free college because of rising cost. His first thing he talks about is how schools cost is expanding as more and more students enroll. He then proceeds to talk about how the cost of college is the main obstacle and they are turning down students and their education because of that cost. The final reason Andrew P. Kelly explains was how the price of college was funding the education and the materials needed to have a good education. The article “The Problem is that Free College Isn’t Free” by Andrew P. Kelly explains how free college is not actually free(as showed by the title).
The authors’ emphasis on “on average” is very effective at showing how their point makes sense and why it should be taken into consideration. I found the way that the authors focused on the minority more than the majority was skillfully effective at showing how some career paths do not require a college education and that the return in investment would not be worth the cost. Throughout their argument I found the writers to mostly use Logos and Ethos in their writing. The Logos is evident by the way they use statistics and the Ethos by how they state telling someone the only way to be successful is to go to college is a disservice. This is effective at making the reader think about how this should affect the decision of going to college and whether they should push someone to go to
Boys to Men In the essay What Does “Boys Will Be Boys” Really Mean, the author Deborah Roffman explains how people perceive and classify boys to be extremely messy in their actions and continuously receive passes for their unacceptable behavior. In the essay How Boys Become Men, the statement “Boys Will Be Boys” expresses how the rules boys set for themselves in their childhood unintentionally effects the decisions they make in their adulthood. The two essays focus on different situations but they come together with the same opinion about men and boys; of whom they focus on the most. One essay focuses mainly on how boys behave and the reason why people classify them the way they do, whereas, the other essay focuses on the effects of how boys learn to behave a certain way and grows into adolescents with the same behavior.
“On average, college graduates make significantly more money over their lifetime than those without a degree… What gets less attention is the fact that not all college degrees or college graduates are equal. ”(pg.208 para. 1) Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill are senior researchers at Brookings’ Center on Children and Families, Sawhill is also a senior fellow in economics study at Brookings’. Owen and Sawhill authored the essay, “Should everyone go to College?” The authors use a wide variety of rhetorical devices in the essay, including ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade their audience to take another look at whether college is the right choice for them.
He is agreeing with the overall argument that college is very important and that those who dream and want to further their education should have the right to. Regardless of the many obstacles such
His education from college will benefit him to get a better job so he does not have to slave away at a factory. “All the advice and public-service announcements about the value of an education that used to
In my opinion, the author is stating that all the statistics should be laid out for the student and left up to them to decide if they are interested in pursuing college. In sum, then, the issue is whether college is worth the time or money. Though I concede that college is pricey and can consume a lot of your time, my view is that college is the best option after high school. Writers of article “Should Everyone go to college” suggest three main reasons as to why high school students should think twice before attending college.