The Communist Manifesto, A book written and published in the second half of the 1800’s, was created by Karl Marx to depict his thoughts behind a fully communal country. This form of government appeared in China around 1920’s and by the 1950’s fully took over, covering the large country in red. Red as the Communist nations, and Red as the blood that was spilled during and after the revolution. An answer came to the people looking to protect them against the extreme and radical government; Human rights. Smitten onto paper and forged into China’s legal documents, some may view China as a country of little corruption and respect towards personal freedoms, however, that remains untrue as long as they disregard the human rights and freedoms of …show more content…
Chinese Authorities targeting human rights lawyers and activists, put them in secret detention chambers, restraining them from being able to communicate with lawyers and family. Family, supporters, and lawyers, that sought for the release of the detainees, or even inquired about the cases, instantly became targets of the authorities. Through censorships and punishments, the freedom of expression has already become horrifically restricted, yet on the internet it shows to further restrict the voice of civilians. With Communism, and the mindset of not accepting western ideologies, human rights find it hard to reach the red and yellow nation. After almost a hundred years of history with human rights, China’s government still chooses to only partially express the human right, causing the people to only be able to partially express their …show more content…
After more than three decades of China’s pledge to “reform and open up”, China still has little signs to removing its authoritarian government for a democratic one. A recurring fundamental human right to expression still lays dire. Already known to restrict the freedom through censorship in China, the recent years have been struck particularly hard, with the election of President Xi. In February, President Xi visited three major state media outlets, to have them pledge absolute loyalty to his party. Later that month, the prominent blogger Ren Zhiqian, had his blog of 35 million followers shut down, after making remarks criticizing Xi’s media visits. Which is curiously ironic, because In the 1990’s published papers on human rights, the constitution claimed that “In addition to the right to vote and to be elected mentioned above, citizens also enjoy freedoms of speech, the press, assembly, association, procession and demonstration. There is no news censorship in China.” These were legalized documents that were suppose to represent the government. Papers that were suppose to protect the country's citizens from obstructions and corruption within the document. It is curious however to see that the party in which instilled and pledged to these rights, chose to almost even reject the existence of them. We see this type of “news censorship” a multitude of times when the press announced
The government is involved in the Chinese Exclusion Acts so it makes their perspective pose a potential bias, the government can be defending and hiding things within the source to save its reputation. The limitations of the purpose of the source arise through the possibility of the government using the source to clear its name and show how the Chinese Exclusion Acts were resolved which makes the sole motive for publishing the document, saving the reputation of the government after the acts. The limitations of content are emphasized when looking into how it impacted people because the acts simply do not highlight the reality of the Chinese Exclusion Acts which could pose a limitation to understanding the events that occurred because the documents only provide the context of
He forewarns the potential for corrupt governments to censor information and suppress
President Xi wrote his thought into the Chinese Constitution in 2017. Xi thought says that global triumph of socialism over capitalism is
They created a new language called Newspeak that doesn’t have words that allow people to express their thoughts, or even have thoughts that go against the party. Words and ideas like revolution don’t even exist in the society. They use fear by putting two-way televisions everywhere so they can permanently watch everybody. Even if they aren’t watching, people are behaving because they don’t know if someone is watching or not and they are afraid of what will happen if someone sees them breaking a rule. When someone thinks or does something that goes against the regime, the Party takes them in a prison and tortures them until they change or sometimes just kills them.
In today's world, human rights still face many challenges and problems. There are still political systems and behaviors in the world that do not respect human rights, such as dictatorial regimes, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, poverty, hunger, and other issues. In addition, new technology and globalization trends have brought new challenges to human rights protection, such as privacy protection, digital rights, and other
In the article, “China Censors: The Tiananmen Square Anniversary Will Not Be Tweeted” it wrote, “Tanks and soldiers were sent in to control the crowds.” In 1989 some students were protesting against the Chinese government, and it got out of control and people were injured. People all over the world were reporting on this topic. This may emphasize why we need to censor the world, so violent protests will not occur. This is the opposite though, without protests no change will occur.
It might take away a person’s ability to speak freely, or keep some books from being written. They wanted people’s rights
To many, violation of human rights is a serious issue. This shows that for every negative force, there is always someone who recognizes the wrong and seeks to correct
Without freedom of the press discussions cannot reach a wider audience, debate is obstructed,
As part of a democracy, one is free to make their own lawful choices and to express their own opinions.
The freedoms of speech and of press are quintessential American rights, afford to it’s citizens through the ratification of the first amendment on December 15, 1791. These rights protect the voices of minority's, inform citizens, preserve the truth and create a watchdog for government corruption. Although these rights are toted in high esteem by most Americans, most are unaware these freedoms are not absolute and poses limitations. Such limitations sometimes include speech that criticizes the government. Throughout American history freedom of expression seem to be treated
Many people consider the repressive capability of an authoritarian regime as the most serious factor as to why these regimes remains durable. They are able to some what manipulate and establish their rule as almost a norm in society. It is obvious that repression is very much present in china in a number of different ways for example in relation to internet censorship. Internet censorship being the great firewall of china a surveillance project controlled and operated by the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) division of the Chinese government. Internet censorship breaches the right to freedom of expression and the surveillance of it also breaches the right to privacy (Morozov,2011).
Contrary to the finding that “income inequality increases socio-political instability” (Alesina and Perotti, 1993, p. 18) current levels of inequality in China seems to have little impact on the societal status quo. Although China has experienced massive number of social protests, about 180,000 to 230,000 in 2010 alone (Gӧbel and Ong, 2012, p. 8), these protests are motivated by “abuses of power and other procedural justice issues, rather than being fueled by feelings of distributive injustice and anger at the rich” (Whyte, 2012, p. 6). According to a research paper funded by the European Union (Gӧbel and Ong, 2012, p. 36), income inequality is not among the top five motivations for social protests which include land disputes and environmental degradation. This data is evidently incompatible with a survey finding that income inequality is too great for 95% of Chinese as opposed to only 65% of Americans. Barring survey inaccuracy, high levels of inequality in China so far does not translate to dissatisfaction that leads to outright mass protests and instability.
The author documents the dismissed university teaching staff living in dilapidated conditions with the rest of the populace giving them a wide berth. The close-knit nature of Chinese communities implies that the fate of the surviving active participants of the 1989 protest is sealed. It seems to several of the survivors of Tiananmen Square protests; the Square is the anti-climax of their hopes for change. The Square has ruined their once illustrious life. They are seen as society’s misnomers or residues.
It devotes vast energy and resources to control information as a way to maintain social stability and assert political control. The Chinese government’s sophisticated instruments of censorship and control aim to prevent all potential sources of independent reporting. The comprehensive management consists of three main categories: legal, political, and economic. Legal methods create an environment that is unfriendly to press freedom through restrictive laws and regulations, including the structure of official media regulatory