During the early 1600’s there were two influential men, John Smith and William Bradford, that both wrote stories on their experience in America being European, where they set off to the New World to become leaders of a colony. Smith wrote The General History of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles and Bradford wrote Of Plymouth Plantation. Smith became a leader of Jamestown, and Bradford became the governor of Plymouth. Smith and Bradford had major differences when it came to their views on Native Americans. They both want the majority same thing for their communities, but they do have some differences on how they want their community to be. Smith and Bradford were very different in their leadership roles. Smith and Bradford had many differences in their personalities and throughout their voyage to the New World. …show more content…
Smith referred Native Americans to savages, and paints negative pictures of them at their feasts, because he saw that the Native Americans killed the English newcomers that were trying to cross the Native Americans tribes to get to wherever their destination was. Smith met a young girl named Pocahontas when natives took him to Werowocomoco for the King to kill him, and Pocahontas laid herself on Smith and wrapped her arm around his head to save him from death. Pocahontas and Smith had a argument when they later met again, about him not getting in not writing her back. Smith looked down on Native Americans even though they were the reason for the colonies surviving. Bradford had many interactions with Native Americans throughout this journey. Every Native American Bradford met were very friendly to him and spoke English. Bradford viewed them and Indians rather than Native Americans, due to their kindness and respect; therefore he referred to most of them as
While both settlers were met with Natives of the new land, each had two profound differences as to how they went about communicating and living with them. In order to best answer the question that still is of relevance to today’s nation, “Why did Plymouth, rather than Jamestown, earn pride of
“Nathaniel Bacon disregarded the Governor’s direct orders by seizing some friendly Appomattox Indians for “allegedly” stealing corn” (National Park Services). Sometimes the ones that were perfectly fine with the colonists at the time, got punished the most. No one was safe from the discrimination and hatred. It may seem that the Indians were treated poorly from the start, but it actually became worse once William Berkeley repeatedly refused to offer Nathaniel his
Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.
Although all the colonists all came from England, the community development, purpose, and societal make-up caused a distinct difference between two distinct societies in New England and the Chesapeake region. The distinctions were obvious, whether it be the volume of religious drive, the need or lack of community, families versus single settlers, the decision on minimal wage, whether or not articles of agreements were drawn for and titles as well as other social matters were drawn, as well as where loyalties lay in leaders. New England was, overall, more religious than the Chesapeake region. Settlers in New England were searching relief for religious persecution in Europe. Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics were coming in droves to America searching for an opportunity to have religious freedom.
Thanksgiving a time where people sit around the table and be thankful for the things they have. However, many people know of how it became a holiday, but people don’t know is who started this holiday. The man who had started Thanksgiving was named William Bradford; It started from his marriage ceremony in the New World where the (Johnson) Wampanoags Native Americans (Whitehurst and Ruffin 18) brought over turkeys and deer to feast on (Johnson). William Bradford was the second governor of Plymouth for his wisdom and leadership; he ran for governor for thirty years with a five year break.
The colonists portrayed the natives as uncivilized barbarians, and John Smith’s account is the epitome of this idea. His portrayal of the story reflects the natives as inferiors while displaying the colonists as superior individuals who always have the upper hand. Smith describes how for “six or seven weeks those barbarians kept him prisoner,” however he was able to improve their image in the natives’ eyes so much that “those savages admired him more than their own” and he was able to gain back his freedom (Smith 63). John Smith uses bias in his account in order to generate a better look for himself over the natives. He expresses the overall general consensus in how the colonists felt about the natives, portraying them as overwhelmingly barbaric and savage-like who captured him for such a long period.
During the early 1600s, Edward Winslow and Captain Smith each wrote a letter describing the “new world.” The two letters are very different and have very different focuses. Smith wrote his letter like a military report and focuses on how difficult it would be to control the land. Winslow focuses more on survival and the people that reside in the nearby areas. The two colonists look at the “new world” through very different eyes.
Most likely, one has heard about the story of Pocahontas and John Smith. However, John Smith was not as loving and kind as he was portrayed. In the letter Address to Captain Smith, the speaker, Chief Powhatan, Pocahontas’ father, takes a condescending tone and addresses to the English settlers, especially John Smith, how the chief’s generous hospitality has not been appreciated. Literary devices such as rhetorical questions, antithesis, and repetition, diction, and pathos and ethos are exercised by Chief Powhatan to address his purpose and produce it as impactful as fully possible.
Although Byrd and Bradford were both writing about the same topic, they had very different purposes for writing each of their articles. In Bradford and Byrd’s articles, they both examined the early settlers and both perceived them differently. Bradford described the settlers as very hardworking and determined. They were willing to do anything and everything to be successful in the new country. On their journey to America they had a lot of troubles, including problems with their ship, but that did not let it stop them.
Thomas Morton and William Bradford are both famous for their accounts of New England. Thomas Morton and William Bradford practiced different religions. Thomas Morton was a conservative Anglican, which meant that he believed in the Church of England. William Bradford was a Puritan, which meant that he wanted separate congregations from the Church of England. Both men based their accounts of New England off of their religious views.
The arrival of the first Europeans in the Americas is dramatically captured through the many writers who attempted to communicate what they saw, experienced and felt. What is more, the very purposes of their treacherous travel and colonization are clearly seen in their writings; whether it is poetry, history or sermons. Of the many literary pieces available today, William Bradford and John Winthrop’s writings, even though vary because the first is a historical account and the second is a sermon, stand out as presenting a clear trust in God, the rules that would govern them and the reason they have arrived in the Americas. First of all, William Bradford provides an in-depth look into the first moment when the Puritans arrived in the Americas. In fact, he chronicles the hardships they face on their way to Plymouth, yet he includes God’s provision every step of the way.
This leads to an inference that Smith never took the time to learn their names and that it was out of importance. This pointed out that Smith was selfish and conceded with himself. In Of Plymouth Plantation during the time of describing Indians, “His name was Samoset. He told them also of another Indian whose name was Squanto, a native of this place, who had been in England and could speak better English than himself” (Bradford 82). This statement shows that he knew some of the Indians names, yet Smith always called them insulting names or referred to them as “them” (75) or “they”
Both John Smith and William Bradford were Englishmen who came to America and helped to found the earliest colonies in New England. They came at different times and for different reasons. Both tell of events during these travels in their written accounts, but these accounts show that the two men, as well as their goals, were drastically different. Captain John Smith, considered to be the first American writer, came to America in the spring of 1607. He had many adventures prior to the voyage to New England, and thought quite highly of himself, as is clear in his writings.
In 1608, there was a race to get to the Americas, which were beginning to be colonized. Britain used lots of advertising to try to convince people to move. During this time, John Smith had been exploring the territory around the Virginia area when he had an encounter with the local American Indian tribe. Many people are unsure what happened during this encounter, and historians argue whether or not Pocahontas saved John Smith when the emperor of the tribe supposedly attempted to kill him. Pocahontas did not save John Smith’s life because the emperor was kind to him; in fact, the emperor was not going to kill John Smith at all.
The Native Americans and did have some similarities, “both groups deep religious beliefs, subsided primarily on agriculture, accepted a social and political hierarchy, and observed well-defined gender rolls” (Norton, 39). All of these similarities were vague. Their religions were very different, they used dissimilar agricultural techniques, their hierarchies were vastly different, and some of their gender rolls were converse from one another. The colonist also had different views on land owner ship, “the Indians granted the English permission to live on pieces of land within their territories. The English saw this as a right to own and permanently occupy the land.”