Often history lessons debate the ruling between the United States Supreme Court and the Cherokee Nation. In 1831 Chief Justice John Marshall deemed the Cherokee Nation a “ward to its guardian”. Chief Justice Marshall pointed to Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution as evidence; separated "foreign nations" and "Indian tribes" because they did not consider the Indian nations as either foreign or independent. [1] Since the Cherokee were not a foreign state, he concluded, the Court had no original jurisdiction powers, and so it could not grant the injunction that the Cherokee desired. Many historians have denounced Marshall's opinion as inconsistent, weak, or merely protective of the Court's power. In Fletcher v. Peck, the case in which the …show more content…
Georgia never replied to the allegations against the laws instituted by the state; instead, the state asserted that the Supreme Court had no power to oversee a state's business. Georgia lobbied Congress during arguments of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia to limit the powers that the Supreme Court had under Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. In the Judiciary Act, Congress had allowed the Supreme Court to declare a state law unconstitutional and to grant such an injunction that the Cherokee sought.[3] Chief Justice Marshall had found in the Cherokee Nations favor that Georgia had no jurisdiction over the Cherokees and no claim to their lands. Even after the findings by the Chief Justice Marshall, Georgia simply ignored the ruling, and President Jackson refused to enforce it. Jackson was angry and personally insulted by the Marshall ruling, stating, "Mr. Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it!"[4] If the Supreme Court would have ruled in favor of Cherokee and other Indian nations were indeed independent; this could have then allowed European nations, to move into American lands and form alliances with the Indians. …show more content…
However, President Jackson and his government more than often ignored the letter of the law and forced Native Americans to vacate lands they had lived on for several generations. In the winter of 1831, under threat of invasion by the U.S. Army, the Choctaw became the first nation to be expelled from its land completely. They made the journey to Indian Territory on foot, without any food or supplies, nor help from the government. Thousands of Indians died along the way. By 1838, an estimated 2,000 Cherokees had left their Georgia homeland for Indian Territory and 7,000 soldiers were sent to expedite the removal process. The army marched the Indians more than 1,200 miles to Indian territory and during this long journey several Cherokee died due to such diseases as: Whooping cough, typhus, dysentery, cholera and starvation were epidemic along the way. It was estimated that more than 5,000 Cherokee died as a
The Cherokee people were faced with a problem because they were forced to leave their property due to the Indian Removal Act. This Act was presented by Georgia so the state could have Cherokee land. The historical question is asking what path was best; migrating west or to stay put and fight back? The tribe was torn on what side to be a part of.
1. I do not agree with the case Georgia v. the Cherokee Nation because I feel it is not fair for Cherokees. This case just give us its purpose without any reason why those nation must move out and immigrate to new settlements in west, “[t]he full moon of May is already on the wane; and before another shall have passed away, every Cherokee man, woman and child in those states must be in motion to join their brethren in the far West.” It also forces that nation to obey by the treaty and troops. For examples, “[b]y the treaty, the emigration was to have been completed on or before the 23rd of this month…” and “[r]eceive [troops] and confide in them as such.
Several states passed laws limiting Native American sovereignty and rights and encroaching on their territory. In a few cases, such as Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court were against these practices and affirmed that native nations were sovereign nations “in which the laws of Georgia and other states can have no force. As President Andrew Jackson himself noted in 1832, that if no one intended to enforce the Supreme Court’s rulings then the decisions would , in his own words, “[fall]…still born.” Basically, if no one enforced the Supreme Court’s ruling, then it might as well never happened. “Estimates based on tribal and military records suggest that approximately 100,000 indigenous people were forced from their homes during that period, which is sometimes known as the removal era, and that some 15,000 died during the journey west.”
In the article it states that 10% of the cherokee Indians only moved to the new Indian territory. This means that the cherokee doesn’t wanna move due to their past problems, the cherokee possibly doesn’t want to move due to the fact that their land was carved into something they love, the cherokee may not want to move. Also, the supreme court even says “...Indian Territory shows how little support the treaty has.” , this obviously means that the Cherokee doesn’t want to move at all. More the reason why they shouldn’t move.
The document “Thomas Jefferson and the American Indian Nations: Native American Sovereignty and the Marshall Court” is a historical journal article written in 2006. It was published in the thirty first volume of the Journal of Supreme Court History, a popular historical journal focusing on the history and actions of the Supreme Court. It was written by Stephen G. Bragaw, Ph.D., a Visiting Professor of Politics at Washington and Lee University. He has published numerous articles and papers, and has extensive experience in American History and Politics. The Journal of Supreme Court History is a historical journal that is very popular among historians, those interested in the history of the Supreme Court, and most likely also modern politicians
Andrew Jackson, John Marshall, and The Trail of Tears There have been many dark times in our History as Americans. Among them is the Trail of Tears,brought upon by Andrew Jackson, which exiled the Indians from the American south and resulted in the death of thousands on the way to Oklahoma. Before this trying time there was speculation within the supreme court whether to treat the Native tribes as a sovereign foreign nation or as a dependent entity within the United States. I will discuss how these decisions came to be, the reactions to said decisions, and the aftermath of these rulings which inevitably leads to the Trail of Tears.
In the article Worchester v Georgia from pbs.org is says in the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia conducted a relentless campaign to remove the Cherokees. Then Marshall Worcester took Georgia to court. Congress voted in favor of Worcester. So technically no one could move them off their land. Andrew Jackson didn't listen to congress and when the Indian removal act was passed, he moved them off their land.
The time period of 1828 to 1836 was an eight year time span in which Andrew Jackson, a Democrat, serve two terms as president of the United States in which he sought to be a champion of the common man. To fully understand this time period, one must look at the the context. Before this period, the Democratic-Republicans most recently controlled the presidency under John Quincy Adam, who won the 1824 election against Jackson due to the Corrupt Bargain. This led to anger and resentment towards Adams and drastically destroyed his political party's image. In addition, beginning in the West as new states were being added their constitutions allowed for all white males to participate in voting.
This law allowed the federal government to pay the natives to move west. Most Native Americans accepted the payment for their lands and agreed to move, but the Cherokee nation refused. They took their case to the Supreme Court, and Chief Justice John Marshall decided that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokees. Jackson disagreed with the Supreme Court’s ruling. The textbook states “ ‘John Marshall has made his decision,’ Jackson reportedly said.
The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.
The case of Cherokee Nation V Georgia was a very important one. For a long time the Cherokee Nation lived in Georgia for hundreds of years. The Cherokee Nation has helped shape our country. When Hernando de Soto came to what is now the United States, he encountered at least three Cherokee Native American tribes. In the year of 1711, the English have given firearms to the Cherokees in exchange for their help in fighting the Tuscarora in the Tuscarora War.
“No one need think that the world can be ruled without blood. The civil sword shall and must be red and bloody.” “Peace, above all things, is to be desired, but blood must sometimes be spilled to obtain it on equable and lasting terms.” In both of these quotes from the United States’ 9th president, the word ‘blood’ is used rather lightly. Throughout all of Andrew Jackson’s presidency and life before the office, he was considered a powerful man.
On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.
The Genocide: Trail of Tears/ The Indian removal act During the 1830s the united states congress and president Andrew Jackson created and passed the “Indian removal act”. Which allowed Jackson to forcibly remove the Indians from their native lands in the southeastern states, such as Florida and Mississippi, and send them to specific “Indian reservations” across the Mississippi river, so the whites could take over their land. From 1830-1839 the five civilized tribes (The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chickasaw) were forced, sometimes by gun point, to march about 1,000 miles to what is present day Oklahoma.
However, in 1830, the Indian removal act of 1830 was signed by Andrew Jackson and suddenly everything changed. “The Indian Removal Act in 1830 forced the relocation of more than 60,000 Native Americans to clear