Compare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights Of Anti-Federalist And Anti Federalists

505 Words3 Pages

In 1775, the Revolutionary War between Americans and Britain started. The reason why colonies decided to get independence was colonists did not want to be under the oppression of British anymore. They were angry when British imposed taxes on them because they felt that British ignored their rights. They had an effort to self rule from government in political ways, but it was no use changing their situation. They had disappointment to Britain, and recognized that it was not possible to be free within the British system. So, to have the power to control their own government, the colonists determined to separate from Britain. Then, on 1776, thirteen colonies declared independence and the United States was created.
In the early period in shaping the United States, Federalists who wanted a strong central government and Anti-federalists who wanted a strong state government had conflict. It was because Anti-federalists wanted to include bill of rights in Constitution while federalists did not agree. "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse."1 This is said by Thomas Jefferson. This quote is the best to show why Anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights. They expected it could …show more content…

It helped in making good advantages for the country. Americans became free people who had divine rights under the government unlike the time when they were only the subjects under the control of ruler. They could express their opinion because they are free to say what is in their minds. Furthermore, a bill of rights limited the power of monarchs. Monarchs could not use their powers arbitrarily if that were not allowed by Parliament such as enforcing laws and imposing taxes. Under the bill of rights, monarchs were not able to impose punishments in cruel ways on the citizens without

Open Document