Compare And Contrast The French And Indian War

1974 Words8 Pages

The French and Indian war transformed the communities of the British and its North American Colonies exceedingly at the hand of land acquisition concerning native alliances and settlements of the citizens, economics containing elements of navigation systems along with taxes, and ideological relations regarding loyalty versus disloyalty. Prior to the Seven Years’ War English colonies were located throughout the east coast, restricted by the Appalachian mountain range. Moving towards the North New France had dwelled who had aspired to control the Mississippi River as well as the lands between the river and the mountains to the east. The French preferred water ways that allowed access to the inland. The Iroquois were crucial allies to the French …show more content…

Mercantilism was the operating economy system of the time. British main focus was to make sure their colonies exported more than they were required hearsay to import. Colonies provided raw materials for their mother country and existed merely to enrich the mother country. Throughout the 17th and 18th century the British government was starting to become weary with the fact of their North American colonies becoming more superior to the mother country. Since, that cannot be the British government had to impose regulations on colonial trade. They first imposed the Navigation Act of 1660 to regulate the prospering colonies. The Navigation Act of 1660 stated, all colonial trade had to be conducted by English ships, and some colonial products were to be enumerated articles. With these enumerated articles all that were imported into England, were subject to duties. Follow that act the Staple Act of 1663 was declared. The Staple act stated that no goods, except for salt, wine, servants, and horses could be shipped from any European country to the colonies without passing through England first. American colonists still violated these acts prior to the French and Indian War. The British tried to get tough with their enforcement so they created a new Navigation Act in 1696 which required all colonial governors to take an oath promising to uphold the Navigation Acts. The British tried to create a …show more content…

The French colonists were loyal and had Native American alliances. The colonists and French rulers both saw their relations with the Indians as a vital resource for their hopefully prospering colony. Though all colonies have their problems with the rulers and government systems the colonists were still loyal trying to survive and thrive. The colonists listen to the command of the rulers in both the British and French colonies to try and keep peace, yet that did not go well with the British government growing and moving to the French and Indian “territory” in the Ohio Valley. Since laws were not enforced citizens could do as they please without being punished so in the eyes of the government being loyal to the crown. Post French and Indian War ideological relations changed between the citizens and the leaders. The once loyal subjects were now rebelling against the higher authority. In August 1774 argues about Parliamentary jurisdiction appeared in print including James Wilson’s pamphlet which argued that the colonists were not bound by any act of Parliaments because the authority of legislation depended on representation. Thomas Jefferson shared common points with Wilson in his own pamphlet. Jefferson went further on to discuss how if King George did not stop his oppression of the colonists and abuse of his power, the colonists would have the right to separate

Open Document