Andrew Jackson really liked power, some would say he is obsessed with it. Andrew Jackson had an idea called the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears and what it did was that it kicked out the indians from west of the Mississippi. The indians felt very strongly about protecting their land because if you you think about it, what if you had just 1 day to pack up all of the things in your house and had to leave forever. Plus what if on that journey to find a new home, along the way you lost some people like family that you love and care about. That is what the indians had to go through and that changed their lives forever. Many people had many different viewpoints on what should of happened and what decisions should have been made to prevent …show more content…
Many people had many different viewpoints on what should of happened and what decisions should have been made to prevent or help the indian removal act and the trail of tears. The video mostly just showed how the indians were getting through the moving process and how they were reacting and less of Andrew Jackson during his ruling. The Andrew Jackson speech mostly showed his misuse of power and how many things he has vetoed or put down. It also shows how he proves his claim that thinks and tries to prove that the removal act was a great, useful idea. The Soldiers account basically says the Removal Act was bad and worthless to move these innocent people out of their homes just for their land and moving them at a thousand miles away just nothing many died because they had nothing also due to the conditions being so they would have to start life low again and try to make their way to a powerful tribe again.It shows you how things went when Andrew Jackson was president. it showed you that things were harsh in life was not even close to perfect for anyone. It showed that some people can be greedy and abused the things they can take for granted. It showed that people got pushed around and things weren't fair. It showed that some things that the government does aren’t necessarily the right things to do And sometimes they can be useless or Ineffective.The Indian Removal Act in the Trail of Tears was a good example of one of the government's bad decisions.The Indian Removal Act in the Trail of Tears were significant to US history because it showed how much Indians and natives got pushed around by Andrew Jackson. America isn’t really afraid of hurting people of their lives, and we are willing to take risks to get what we want. It expanded and created more Power for presidency. But we obviously didn't learn her lesson because a hundred years later
The Indian Removal Act was a law that allowed the president to bargain with Indian tribes in the south of the United States of America for their disposal to federal territory. So it basically forced the indians to move out of their own homes. In 1832, Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the bank of the United States of America. In 1835, they went into federal dept, Jackson worked extremely forceful and paid off the whole national debt after he was elected as president again in 1832.
President Andrew Jackson was not a good leader. I say this because he was unfair. President Jackson Signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal act was started because people in Georgia wanted to expand their land to the South so they could plant more crops. By doing this the Indians were forced to move out of there land.
Jackson’s belief that he was the “defender of the common man” led him to assume that he had supreme authority over the government, and as a result, ignored the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place by Congress and forced the Indian tribes to move west on the Trail of Tears. Jackson’s bold actions led to a great increase of power in the executive office. Resembling that of Jackson, Abraham Lincoln’s presidency also fortified executive power. During the Civil War, Lincoln’s “presidency shattered all precedents [and the]…. actions taken by the president were by no means understood to be powers of the executive” (Baker 176-177).
In the 1800s, the Jacksonian Democrats were a major political group in the United States. This party had great social, economic, and political effects. Jacksonian politics and the biblical belief of honoring God deserve to be explored and compared in order to better understand both views. Once this exploration is complete, it can be concluded that Jacksonian politics, as a whole, cannot be compatible with the biblical view of honoring God because it undermined the value of community and equality, supported manipulative rule, and contradicted its own doctrines through questionable and even sinful actions. It is important to establish what Christianity says about honoring God in order to compare these two views.
Andrew Jackson once said, “There are no necessary evils in government. Its evils exist only in its abuses.” In perspective, Jackson’s work can also be applied to his own quote in which he tries to talk about the rich men who use their power for personal gain or social status. The Indians who were endlessly persecuted hated his unmerciful hand that was responsible for the killing of thousands. Andrew Jackson forced the Native Americans to an early death by pushing them to the Indian territory of present day Oklahoma.
The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove
Although this act was harsh, to some it overshadows the good that Jackson did. In the source: Letter from Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Indian, Elias says, “Removal, then, is the only remedy, the only practical remedy. Our people may finally rise from their very ashes, to become prosperous and happy, and a credit to our race.” The quote is from a Cherokee Indian agreeing that the removal might be the best thing for the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson is a hero because he worked to bring more democracy to the
I decided to research about The Trail of Tears Removal Act when my mom bought me a book about “100 events that changed the world” to give me some ideas for the trail of tears. Each day I would read about five to ten stories right before I went to bed. I finally landed on the Trail of Tears and remembered in fifth grade learning about the horrible journey. Before doing any research on the Trail of Tears I assumed that the Americans were being greedy and wanted more land. But no, they found gold and pushed away the Native Americans to the Indian Territory which began their journey.
The Supreme Court ruled that the Indians had a right to their land. Even after that ruling, Jackson still continued with the Indian Removal. He was messing up the government's system of check and balances. He forced the Indians to go on the Trail of Tears. This was the Native Americans journey to Indian Territory.
Andrew Jackson was one of the greatest presidents who made very difficult decisions for our country. Although his choices were not always the popular decision, he made choices that were always promoting democracy. The things that make a good democracy are: giving people a say in government, having a good leader that you can trust to make wise decisions, peace and stability between each country and other states, and having equal power in the government (checks and balances). Andrew Jackson came into office with a popular vote and great support. His supporters viewed him as a man of the people.
Andrew Jackson, being a tyrant, abused his power in his time of presidency. He was the 7th president, but before Jackson’s presidency, he had no political experience. One of the only things that really qualified him was the hardships he went through when he was younger. His father had died while Jackson was young and Jackson received the reputation as a “self-made man”, or an independent man.
Does Andrew Jackson Deserve to be on the 20-dollar bill? In my belief Andrew Jackson does not belong on the 20-dollar bill, due to the simple fact of that in 1836 Andrew Jackson tried over throwing the U.S national bank because he believed that hard currency like gold and sliver should be used. Andrew Jackson in some sense is an ironic placement on any paper currency in the United States. Although this topic is very controversial in the United States. I will try and clarify my belief about why Andrew Jacksons placement on the twenty dollar bill and why he should be reconsidered.
Andrew Jackson has been remembered as a ground breaking president, even being put on the $20. President Jackson was a controversial figure, doing many popular and unpopular things in his time. Although he is remembered as a hero from the war of 1812, he also caused the Trail of Tears and tried to destroy the National Bank. As a result, Jackson should not be put on the $20 bill. His actions have caused many misfortune showing that villains do exist.
Nobody's lives would be the same after losing the ones they had lost during the long journey. The Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears were terrible events for the Native American people to live through. They lost lives, supplies, homes, and family memories.
It shows the what kids during that time went though and what they saw just playing outside. They saw the hate of blacks and whites. The kids saw how badly the black people we thought of and they could not do anything about it. They saw how people could blame anything on a black person and a white person would