ipl-logo

Compromise Of 1850 Compromises Essay

870 Words4 Pages

In the early nineteenth century, series of compromises had been made in order to keep the states unified rather than divided. The overall reason for the sectionalism in the nation had all started from slavery. Compromises passed by Congress were used to keep the nation unified hoping to resolve the political disputes by trying to appeal to the South, by feeding into their “need” of slaves. However, political disputes could no longer be resolved by compromise due to different social views, lack of government interference, and the belief over whether the north or the south is more superior. Therefore, from 1820-1860, compromises could no longer help solve political disputes. In the nineteenth century, slavery played the biggest role on why …show more content…

There were treaties created to find peace within the nation, but it wasn’t much help. Compromises such as the Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850 had been “flops” because of instead of government taking the authority; they give into the peoples wants. The purpose of these compromises were to end the dispute over slavery by trying to make half the states free and the other have slave states (Missouri Compromise), or to have people return slave states and have new admitted states choose where they wanted to be slave or a frees state (Compromise of 1850). A common factor that they both share is that Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850 had been created by Henry Clay, who had said “I believe it is utterly impracticable, whatever course of legislation she may choose to adopt, for her to succeed (Doc A).” In Document E, a cartoon of Preston Brooks caning Charles Sumner is being shown. The purpose of this picture is to show that other government officials (in the back) had found entertainment in the violence rather than do something to stop it, which means that they’re not willing to interfere in something like that, what more a more serious situation. Also, it shows that the north and south can no longer be civil with one another since violence was resulted

Show More
Related

  • Southern Secession Dbq

    266 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this paper there has been a discussion of the legislation and the tensions preceding the southern Secession. Based on this discussing it can be concluded that the tensions, which culminated with the Civil War, were present many decades before the secession itself. Even threats of Civil war and secession were present much prior to this particular conflict. 
This paper has also concluded that the threat of Lincoln was real to the South, because of the Republican party’s very distinct foundation as an anti-slavery party. Slavery was a soft spot in the South because of the substantial value slaves had.

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

    133 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1877 was brought to attention recently, shortly after the Presidential Election of 1876. It called to resolve the disputed 1876 presidential elections in the United States. This was supposedly a deal to make it so Rutherford Hayes, the Republican Party candidate running for president, could become president. The Democrats would also become powerful in the governments within the South. Having Hayes, when he would become president, promise to allow troops to be pulled out of the rebelling states and slave states out of the South, it would the Democrats to become just that.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Research Paper

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

    Read More

  • Compromises In Bleeding Kansas

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    Prior to the events of Bleeding Kansas that begun in 1854, the United States followed a strict policy of compromise in regards to it’s political decisions. Being a relatively newly founded country a great deal of care was given towards pleasing the citizens of the United States, through compromise, in order to maintain a stable society. This is specifically evident in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850. These events helped to maintain the stability of American society for a time. However, as the nation developed further there became apparent divides on many matters, but mainly over slavery.

    Read More

  • 1820-1860 Dbq Analysis

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    DBQ: Political Disputes 1820-1860 For forty-four years, the United States of America was a thriving country. We had won our independence from Great Britain and we had started to create a country that would change the world. Yet, in the year 1860, a joined country and political agreement between all states seemed utterly impossible. People fought with each other so deeply about slavery, the country was divided between slave and free states. By the time of 1820 through 1860, political disagreement grew so large, there had been only one answer.

    Read More

  • What Are The Problems With The Article's Of Confederation Dbq

    632 Words  | 3 Pages

    To resolve these differences The Great Compromise happened. The Great Compromise was a system of federalism—power is shared between the state government and the

    Read More

  • How Did The Underground Railroad Lead To The Civil War Compromise

    1085 Words  | 5 Pages

    Did you ever want to know why we were never to find a compromise on slavery which lead us to the civil war. Well he reason that the US was not able to find a compromise on slavery for 40 years. Is because the north and south were never able to agree on a compromise in the government and with the people. I will be showing you this through 3 sources that are. Uncle Toms Cabin, The Election of 1860 and John brown.

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Compromises In 1860

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    P.6 Compromises seemed to be working in 1820 as a solution to political issues that America agreed to disagreed on. As seen in the Missouri Compromise, where Henry Clay made slaves free in twelve states and not free in the other twelve; in order to keep everything balanced. But between the period of 1820 to 1860, compromising took a shift and no longer seemed to be the solution. Compromises worked with Henry Clay in the Missouri compromise in 1820 but by 1860 due to a series of geographic, political, and social changes compromises were impossible.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government.

    Read More

  • The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

    Read More

  • Confederation Vs Congress

    570 Words  | 3 Pages

    It not only required compromises but it also initiated controversy between the states over who had the most influence and representation in congress. The bigger states wanted population as their representation, while the smaller ones just wanted equality and their voices heard in congress. (2)Amid the verbal skirmish, a man named Roger Sherman ended it and proposed that two houses, one senate and one representative, be established.(4) Silencing the disagreements, Sherman’s idea led to what would be known as the Great Compromise. Now the south had slaves in their hands and wanted them to make up part of the population, and the north was opposed.

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion In America

    785 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the pre-civil war time period— also known as the antebellum years— America experienced a widespread transformation for the sake of its economy. With the booming belief of the Manifest Destiny, America’s constant desire for westward expansion caused disputes between the North and the South regarding the establishment of free states and slave states, which led to certain compromises such as the Missouri Compromise. After the Market Revolution, the North and South used its new gained land to create different means of economic gains; the North became industrialized through manufacturing, while the South became an agricultural industry dependent on cotton. However, as America’s boundaries expanded, tensions between the North and South grew, often leading to compromises in bloodshed. The drastic differences between the two groups eventually transformed America into a divided nation of sectionalism economically, politically, and socially.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    1563 Words  | 7 Pages

    Slavery was a big issue in the 1800s. It divided the country into an argument between having slavery or not having slavery. It also made a conflict between the north and south and they could not agree on it. Some wanted to keep it, some wanted to get rid of it. The states would argue and they could not come up with a compromise.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

    Read More

More about Compromise Of 1850 Compromises Essay

Open Document