Approaching the end of the 1915, Australian experienced a leadership change. The prime minister at that time, William Hughes was a support of Conscription. Conscription means a compulsory enlistment for state service, typically into the armed forces ( the army ). However, the majority of people in the Labor Party did not support conscription and therefore caused conflict.
While some were patriotic and wanted to help to fight for their country, others thought it was a waste of lives and that war was stupid. Among the people who went to war, many of them fought and returned home. Some strongly believed that conscription was needed in order to maintain full strength on the battlefields. One of the main reason that triggered conscription was that
…show more content…
Everyone had their own opinions on the breakout of this war. Not long after, it was very obvious that the nation had split evenly into half. Half supporting conscription and half against it.
The first referendum on conscription was lost only by 72476 votes. ( 1087557 yes and 116033 no). The defeat of the referendum led to a major split in the Labor Party. Hughes and a few others formed a new political party called the National Labor Party. The National Labor Party and the Liberals conjoined. They contested the May 1917 elections calling itself the “ Win the War” party, forming the Nationalist Party, and obviously with the Liberals support, they won easily. Shortly after, Hughes returned the being the Prime Minister. The Australian Labor party was left in an absolute powerless position.
War kept on going, and the enlistment rates continued to decrease. Around 450recruits per month were joining the AIF ( Australian Imperial Forces). Hughes was hoping that at least 16000 men were recruited per month. He asked “ Why should able-bodied Australians be allowed to live in comfort while many of their country men are fighting and dying in France?! “ He decided to hold a second
Conscription is the process, by which a government makes military service obligatory for citizens in a certain age group. Many studies that have been conducted are against this policy as it can be detrimental to a nation’s economic growth and security. More specifically, if implemented in the United States of America, conscription would result in a less lethal military, by producing discontent among its citizens, mediocre performance in the military, and a downward spiral of its economy. The idea of being told to be a soldier against ones will would undoubtedly cause a feeling of resentment towards the American government.
The Viet Cong movement was to declare and spread communism to the South East Asia, the Pacific and ultimately around the world. The US took this as a threat to the human rights and declared war with the Vietnam. As a result, the Australians and New Zealanders must fight along the US in the conflict. Conscription Conscription is the whole idea of compulsory military service.
Ever since the dawn of Republic, the American public grappled with the issue of the military draft. During the American Revolution, the Continental Army struggled to recruit men and enticed the potential soldiers with the lure of the free land or cash incentives. George Washington proposed to institute the draft, however, the Congress rejected his idea. The Civil War, the deadliest of the American armed conflicts, compelled the both warring sides to enact the conscription. The South instituted their draft in 1892, and the North followed with The Draft Act of 1863.
Australia initially became involved in the Vietnam War in august 1962 when 30 military advisors. The men were set the task of assisting in the training of the poorly equip and under trained south Vietnamese army this marked the beginning of Australian involvement in Vietnam. Australian involvement in the Vietnam War potentially was a very costly campaign loosing 520 live, but events and key battles in which Australian troops were involved played a significant role in the events of the Vietnam War. Through out the campaign a total of 49,211 Australians served in Vietnam, which in comparison is very small number to the mammoth American army of 580,000 soldiers. Although having a small number of soldiers serving the Australian forces still played
Australians supported the decision to go to war very enthusiastically in 1914 mainly because they were very loyal to England but of course, there are other reasons which influenced their decision. Because Australia was extremely loyal to their ‘mother country’, they of course did not hesitate in following Britain’s declaration on war. Australians had very little experience before World War 1 which started on the 28th of July, 1914 and continued until the 11th of November, 1918. It was said that the cause of World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and his wife, Sophie who was the Duchess of Hohenberg, in Sarajevo, Bosnia. World War 1 was also known as ‘The Great War’, it was supposedly the war to end all
How did Conscription and the rise of the protest movement affect the lives of Australians in the Vietnam War? The Vietnam War started 1 November 1955 and ended 30 April 1975. 60,000 Australians participated in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was the longest twentieth century conflict.
John Curtin John Curtin was an outstanding individual dedicated to a better Australia. Often described as serious and stern, these characteristics helped him to be the great leader he was during the nation’s toughest times. He was hard working and never stopped fighting for what he believed was right. The combination of these has made him one of the country’s most recognisable Prime Ministers today. This essay will explore how he rose through the ranks: from being an average child in WA to becoming wartime Prime Minister, and his determination and tenacity to overcome the fate of Australia.
Hundreds of thousands of men have volunteered to fight in WWI; however, not all were eligible and most were English-Canadians. As the war dragged on, the amount of volunteers diminished, and soon there were not a sufficient amount of volunteers to supply the war. Previous promises to Britain were made by the Prime Minister that 500,000 men would be sent into action to support the Allies. However, propaganda and posters were not enough to grab the men’s attention. This resulted in the Prime Minister breaking one of his only promises to the citizens of Canada; enabling conscription.
Legalized conscription truly revolutionized Canada’s future. The efforts put into making conscription possible created positive results, the increase in Canadian economy , increase in respect for women, and women 's political rights. All of this had only happened because of conscription. The Canadian economy improved drastically due to conscription.
From the beginning of the United States’ history, conflict has always been prevalent. The need for armed forces continually grows, especially in times of war, as the fight for freedom becomes more challenging. Conscription, better known as the draft, was first introduced during the Civil War as a way to get more individuals involved in the military to fill vacant positions. The practice of the draft was finally discontinued in favor of an all-volunteer military system, when the need for troops was no longer necessary. After almost two decades of being involved overseas, the demand for armed troops is imperative once again.
Not only the war had a massive effect on the Indigenous in Australia, The war was a huge boom to the Australian economy and as it turned out another massive factor. As many Australian fundamental products were purchased as could be produced, and secondary, subsidiary industries manufactured many ‘modern’ items for the services. Many men and women retired and fled their careers to accompany the armed forces leading to a ‘deficit’ of labour. New commerce and businesses need to have been created to fund the troops with combat weapons, uniforms and ammunition. Scarce goods needed to be controlled by the Australian Government in enhancing better buying and selling and in ensuring that everyone received a fair share.
Throughout history, countries are inevitably pulled into conflicts that result in war. These conflicts usually occur because of interests in: economic gain, territorial gain, religion, and nationalism. America, like every country, needs a military to defend itself, especially when tensions arise in other parts of the world and when militia numbers start to decrease. This then allows the government to draft its population to serve in the military. People argue that young men and women’s bright lives are often cut short, and not allowed their Constitutional right to “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”, but there are many benefits for the nation and the individual by serving one’s country.
Events from the Home Front #1 - Conscription One of the most serious controversies experienced by many at the home front during WW1 was conscription. In 1914 Canadian Prime Minister Robert Borden declared that conscription would never be necessary in Canada. Only 2810 men signed up to fight during the war but the Canadian government needed more men. In 1917 conscription was introduced and men were forced to enlist for the war as a result of the Military Service Act that was passed by Prime Minister Borden. Men aged 20-45 were forced to leave their families, join the war and fight for Britain.
During the next 20 years’ Australian citizens grew to consider themselves separate from ‘Mother Country’ making Australia a nation in its own right. This line of thought lead to people questioning if it was still acceptable to give everything they had for Britain. In particular, was it sensible to join a war no matter what the cost to
Conscription, also known as drafting, is a law that the government made for people to go to war. This law stated that anyone who was old enough and was able to fight in the war had to go, whether they wanted to go or not. People thought conscription was very beneficial, I on the other hand disagree. Personally, I do not think conscription is a good idea. It is unfair to force people to go to war, by forcing men to enlist in the army, the army force will not be as strong as it could be, and if conscription occurs, there’s an emotional toll to fighting.