Court cases are common in the United States, they always have been. Many even become headline material, for any number of reasons. During, and even before, the Civil Rights movement, many court cases were fought and won for the oppressed races of America, from the Blacks to the Native Americans, the Asian peoples and the Mexican immigrants. The Civil Rights movement saw plenty of action in the streets from activists, but the truly important part of the Movement, what won equal rights for all races, was the legal battles fought in the background.
We’ll start with one of the most important actions of the Movement and what made it possible. The Freedom Rides, a campaign waged by College Students of both races, riding the newly desegregated interstate
…show more content…
Virginia was another important case in the Movement. It was fought in 1967, and it regarded Virginia’s laws prohibiting interracial marriage. This was a huge step for civil equality, and was a landmark moment for the movement as a whole. The case was presented by Mildred Loving and Richard Loving, a mixed-race couple who were both sentenced to a year in prison for marrying each other, violating the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 in Virginia. The final decision in the Supreme Court was unanimous in deciding interracial marriage was unconstitutional and therefore overturned. This was an impactful decision, letting the couples who’d formed during the civil rights movement stay together, and even …show more content…
The most eye opening case of racism during this period of the movement was the Selma to Montgomery march. The Selma to Montgomery march was conducted by Martin Luther King Jr. in response to the death of Jimmie Lee Jackson, a peaceful demonstrator fatally shot by an Alabama State Trooper during an attack on the group of white segregationists. King and his supporters planned to march from Selma to Montgomery, and refused to let anything stop the march. The group of 600 marched all the way to the Edmund Pettis Bridge and were met with resistance from Alabama State Troopers, armed with teargas and nightsticks. The troopers brutally beat the marchers and forced them all the way back to Selma, the entire scene being captured on national television, causing an uproar across the United States. The coverage of the event brought supporters from across the nation to Selma, bolstering the number of marchers from 600 to 2000. King led them to the bridge, once again blocked by State Troopers. The minister led them in a prayer on the bridge, and the troopers parted from the road in response. However, fearing another brutal beating, King turned his protesters around and returned to Selma. Even if they did not make the march all the way to Montgomery, the nations eyes were opened fully to the exact measure of what the Civil Rights supporters
American citizens were appalled to hear the racial prejudice from the National Socialist German Workers’ Party that terrorized the citizens in Europe overseas, and could not believe the horror stories that plagued those that endured their wrath. Fueled by certain propaganda to gain support for the war effort, America was all too eager to step in and end this unjust discrimination against minorities in Europe. While many campaigned for a victory for America during the war, other citizens were trying to push for another victory in their homeland. African Americans noticed the hypocrisy in this mindset and demanded reform when minorities were still facing discrimination in America. Called the Double V campaign, black organizations sought victory over their enemies on the battlefield overboard as well as victory over enemies at home.
In the case of Loving v. Virginia (1967), an interracial couple by the name of Richard Loving, a Caucasian man, and Mildred Loving, an African American woman, moved to Washington D.C. because of Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924 that banned whites and blacks from marrying. They both grew up in Virginia which was one of the many states that banned interracial marriages. After a few years of being married, the Loving’s returned back to Virginia to shortly be arrested for violating the miscegenation law. The law prohibited black and white couples from marrying out of state and then returning back to Virginia. Richard and Mildred were both charged and guilty of the crime that sentenced them to a year in jail.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on March18, 1965 conducted an interview with Meet the Press. The NBC interview has interviewers from different backgrounds asking Dr. King a series of questions about why he supported the march from Selma. His answers explain that despite the cost of human life demonstrations had the power to exact change in the nation. Martin Luther King also lays out why he believes demonstrations are necessary for civil liberties, and what it would take to stop the demonstrations. Since Meet the Press was intended for a national television researchers would have to be weary of whether Martin with accurately describing his own feelings about The Marches from Selma.
The only thing that was stopping them was Virginia’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act, which stated that interracial marriages were not allowed. Believing to have found a loophole, the couple traveled the Washington D.C. to get married, and then returned back to their home in Virginia.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Facts of the case: In 1924, the state of Virginia passed the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 which banned the marriage between a white person and a person of color. The law only targeted interracial marriages that consisted of a white person and a non-white person. The act had additional provisions that penalized the travel out of state for purposes of marriage between a white person and person of color; upon return to Virginia, the marriage would be subject to Virginian law. The punishment for the marriage was one to five years incarceration, and the marriage would be void “without any judicial proceeding.” Aware of the Racial Integrity Act, Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, traveled
Virginia. This landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court used the fourteenth Amendment to negate the previous laws forbidding interracial marriages. Mildred and Richard Loving pleaded guilty at a hearing in a Virginia state court in 1959, for disobeying Section 20-58 of the Virginia state code, which made it illegal for a “white” person and a “colored” person to return as man and wife after leaving the state to be married. The determined punishment, for violation of said law, was imprisonment in the state penitentiary for one to five years. The Lovings were sentenced to one year in jail, although it was suspended on the condition that the couple leave the state immediately and not return for 25 years.
Protest rallies, drawing thousands in some cases, were held in several cities. “In the south, the verdict seemed to spell the end to the system of "noblesse oblige"(Sewell). It marked the real beginning of the civil rights movement in that part of the country. About five months after the Emmett Till trial, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat to a white person in the back of the bus. “Rosa Parks has said she was thinking of the Till case when she refused to move to the back of a public bus in Montgomery, Alabama”(Kinnon).
On the night of his death he was accompanied by two of his family members, when he was shot by State trooper on February 18th, 1965. His death inspired many to join the march from Selma to Montgomery in his honor. After being stopped by state troopers in the first march, Martin Luther King, Jr. called for a second march with federal protection. Finally the Federal Voting Rights Act was passed on August 6th, 1965. To this day, the march remains an important piece of
The year of 1965 the black community let out a collective victory cry. They had finally gotten the rights they fought hard for. They could at last vote, go to school and college, and got the working condition they deserve. They couldn 't have done it without Martin Luther King Jr., but there were a slew of cases that were tried and further assisted in opening the black community 's opportunity pool. They were well known cases, like the Plessy vs. Ferguson, Brown vs. Board of Education, and the Regents of the University vs. Bakke, all very influential cases in the fight for rights.
When a house finally sold to them, 30 out of the 39 current house owners in the neighborhood signed a contract that stated no home could be sold to an "negro" (Shelley vs. Kraemer) family for the next 50 years. In the case, the ruling went in favor of the Shelley 's, giving them their home back. In addition, the whole covenant was ruled over by the owner of the neighborhood, who did not realize that the people buying the house were free blacks until the day of the purchase. Not to mention the multiple angry residents who made the contract in the first place. Shelley v. Kraemer was the first real freedom for African-Americans, however, it took a little over 90 years (the Dred Scott decision was 91 years before this case) for freedom of blacks to be fully recognized.
Their civil rights case, Loving versus Virginia, went to the Supreme Court, and it ultimately marked a monumental time in American history. For the first time, laws prohibiting interracial marriage were struck down. Richard and Mildred initially pleaded guilty. The judge ruled one year in jail as well as banishment
In 1891, a group of concerned young black men of New Orleans immediately formed the “Citizens’ Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law.” They raised money and engaged Albion W. Tourgée, a prominent Radical Republican author and politician, as their lawyer. The poeple involved in this case are the young concerned black men the us government and the states. On May 15, 1892, the Louisiana State Supreme Court decided in favor of the Pullman Company’s claim that the Separate Car Law was unconstitutional. The importance of this case is that In 1883, the Supreme Court finally ruled that the 14th Amendment did not give Congress authority to prevent discrimination by private individuals(Plessy v.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 consisted of formal and informal rules, personal and personality beliefs, and is now used as evidence in other cases regarding racial discrimination. The formal rule that was important to the outcome of the Civil Rights Act was the hearing of the House Rules Committee. According to the federal Administrative Procedures Act, “there are two types of rulemaking; formal and informal. In the formal rulemaking process, the agency must conduct a hearing on the record, at which evidence is presented.
Civil rights refers to fighting for equal rights between blacks and whites. It is an important part of history. From time to time, people have been fighting for civil rights for blacks in whites in the mid 1900’s. In fact, Bloody Sunday was probably one of the most important events to have an impact on history for civil rights. Everyday, people struggle to be treated equally and civil rights make it possible for everyone black or white to be treated equally.
Injustice The Scottsboro Case shed light on the racial practices expressed in law that made a great impact on the legal system today. The actual victims of the Case did not receive a fair trial due to the color of their skin. The ones who played the victims planned the crime, and their stories made no sense. But like many of the trials during the time it wasn’t based on the actual evidence that was found,or even the defendants ' stories.