Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Era In the Elizabethan Era there was a lot of punishments for the crimes that people did. There were some punishments that people can live through, and there were some punishments that could lead people to death. During this time people just could not kill somebody and just go to prison, you will go down in painful and sometimes slow death. One out of the many punishments people can live through was the pillory. The pillory is a wooden farm work for heads and hands were people were exposed to public abuse. The pillory was set up to hold petty criminals by crossroads, market places, and ect. People were only held in the pillory for two hours at least. When there was a person in the pillory people can walk by and throw tomatoes, rotten food, mud, dead animals, and anything they basically want at the prisoner. Sometimes people will get very violent and throw bricks or pieces of metal and sometimes pieces of glass at the prisoner. (“Internet Shakespeare Editions”). Also, people did crimes were punishments and consequences lead to there death. There were several of crimes in the Elizabethan Era. Some crimes that people do that can lead …show more content…
If a person gets caught for treason it involves a way crueler punishment than just getting hung. For example the person’s head will get cut off because they were going against their government. In the Elizabethan Era people should not go against their government because the people find it very disrespectful. Also, there were way more grievous punishment than that. One of the most grievous punishments was when the “officers” hang the prisoner until they are half dead, then bring them down. Then when they are a quarter alive they will cut their members and bowels and and then throw it in fire. The only way a person will ever get this punishment is for murdering an innocent person. (“Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan
Once they were in that cage they were not tolerated to have contact with anyone whatsoever and no other meal but bread and water. In the dark cell room the prisoners were also stripped down to their underwear and sometimes the prison guards would throw snakes into the cage. A punishment that a prison would extort them if they tried to escape is being changed to the ground outside of the wall, not being able to move or have any contact with other prisoners. There were never any executions at the prison, but there were about 111 people that died there serving time at the prison. Most of the bodies that were at the prison that had died at the prison were due at the back.
The most common punishment was solitary confinement, which was when prisoners were put into cells by themselves. Another punishment was the dark cell. It was a cell that was pitch black and it contained an iron cage in the middle of it, the prisoners would be chained up in the iron cage and only be fed bread and water once a day, which barely kept them alive. The dark cell was also called the snake den because prisoners started a “rumor” that the guards would intentionally drop snakes in there to harass the prisoners, they were given this punishment when they were caught possessing opium, refusing work, or stealing. There was also ball and chain, which was when the prisoners had to carry a heavy ball everywhere they went.
Execution is the act of carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person. This is carried out either by lethal injection or electrocution. Execution despite its barbaric nature has survived in many legal system and will continue to because it: reinforces a state of security of the general public, detters other individuals from committing such crimes, and enforces the concept of cause and effect within the legal system. In the text “The Penalty of Death” H.L. Mencken discusses not only why he supports executions, but also the ripple effects this action has on a society. While in a text entitled “Death Penalty,” Anna Quindlen discusses her objections to execution, because, as she states:”it consists of stooping to the level of the
Breaking the law was no joke back in colonial times. Punishment were extremely harsh. The convict will be punished by physical pain or sometimes death. Do to the poor judgment from the court 's most of the accused were innocent. Even the defendants of the accused were punished, if the accused were proven guilty.
Laws of good and evil no longer mattered to them. Another deeper heart problem was their love for money was worth more to them than their own lives. During the medieval time period, the punishment for murder was often imprisonment which sometimes led to death whether by hanging or stoning. These men allowed their greed to blind them from the bigger picture. It can also be implied that the riches were more important than their brothers’ lives.
The town of Salem, Massachusetts was run by a strict theocracy. The Puritan theocracy looked down upon activities that would be considered “fun,” an example being dancing. If people were caught doing a sinful activity such as this, they could, and most often would, be punished. The punishment for dancing would usually involve being struck by a whip. This way of life was especially difficult for young children who had more energy to use than their lifestyle would allow.
This essay will mention some of the crimes and punishments; it will also explain the differences between the medieval times and the modern times. Crime Crimes for people to commit in the Medieval times was easier for people to commit than. Most of the crimes were very so unnecessary that even lighting a fire can cause big times. Some of the crimes committed in the Medieval times were Theft which means to steal something from another person, Arson which means to light fire in public, Witchcraft means to practise magic such as black magic and a use of spells, Heresay/blasphemy means disrespect towards god because in the Medieval times they looked up to god a lot and they would make big discussions by asking god in a way people would not know. Treason which is traitor to the crown (king), Vagrancy means homelessness which in the medieval times was very common for people that work or the king such as peasants.
Then before we know it, by the end of the day the audience is presented by this old fashioned, gruesome death of stoning. This source is most accurately going to be used in my essay, by its citation for irony of the “stoning” itself. I quote “though the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the original black box, they still remembered to use stones”. Ironically no one in the community understands why they must kill a citizen each year, but in response, know “exactly” how to throw stones and kill
Did you know that for stealing a purse you could have your limbs torn off?During the Elizabethan period, there would be crimes committed followed by punishments. These crimes are most not like the crimes today. Some include stole purses, begging, and poaching. Now you're probably wondering, what such crimes must those be? Money wasn't much easy to get back then so people tried to steal and be able to feed their families.
Across the world, various countries impose sentences on criminals for different reasons. Some reasons include to punish offenders, protect the public, change an offender’s behavior, ensure offenders do something to make up for their crime, and to reduce crime in the future. With that being said, the country I chose to have the better sentencing philosophy as opposed to utilizing them all, is England. I chose the English sentencing philosophy because they utilize isolation, deterrence and rehabilitation as a means of condemning their offenders, and by punishing them in proportion to their culpability for criminal activity (Terrill, 2016). By isolating the offender, the British believe their society would be safer and more protected from
While we prefer life in jail, they preferred death. To conclude, a significant extent of the nature of crime and punishment changed between social classes and over the years since the Medieval Period. This is seen through the significant groups that were involved in medieval crime and punishment, the effects of a person’s social class on crime and punishment, the sort of crime each punishment was used for and the difference between crime and punishments between the Medieval Period and today. The Medieval Period lasted from 476 CE to 1453 CE, with different punishments for each crime committed by different social
In Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging,” he compares the punishments for crimes in the 17th Century to the punishments for crimes in the present. Jacoby suggests in his essay that “the Puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment. Their sanctions were humiliating and painful, but quick and cheap.” Jacoby makes a good argument to bring back an old punishment policy. He points out that “a humiliating and painful paddling can be applied to the rear end of a crook for a lot less than $30,000 (per year).”
Imagine someone that has been stretched out on all four limbs of their body laying there and could not move, because they were tied down. Then was chopped in half all because he or even she stole one piece of bread? It might be hard to imagine because people now days if they create a crime, they are not killed for it. There are simply fined for it or place in jail, and are not beheaded or cut in half. Torturing people back in the medieval days was entertaining for them, they enjoyed looking towards the next day where they can watch people die.
In The Canterbury Tales, more than twenty pilgrims meet at the Tabard Inn, preparing to leave to Canterbury to visit the shrine of the archbishop, Saint Thomas Becket. Before the travellers had set off on their pilgrimage, a character known as the Host decided to create a game between them; all of the pilgrims would tell two tales during the entirety of the trip. Whoever would win would receive a free meal paid by the losers of the game and whoever decided to not participate in the game would be forced to pay during any stop that were made during the trip.. Two of the tales that were told during the pilgrimage included “The Knight’s Tale” and “The Pardoner’s Tale.” Once the pilgrims had returned to the Tabard Inn, the Host judged the tales based on two factors: moral education and entertainment value.
Crucifixion was the capital punishment during ancient times (Roman Empire). Overtime, slaves gained limited legal protection. During the Hadrian Era, it was believed that a master should not hold the power of life and death over a slave (Roman Empire). An owner that killed his slave without just cause was considered a murderer, as they should have been. Overtime, a slave could even complain of mistreatment and appear in court to appeal against his