Injustice Within Our Justice? What causes you to be more anxious, a cop’s presence or a white van’s? Despite the heavy belief that white vans are suspicious or dangerous, would you believe many are more uncomfortable with the police around? This is because we fear their power over us. We learned to be obedient and to respect those with authority. In our minds resisting the formal social controls is a deviant act and would result in a negative consequence. Should we fear and question those in power? According to Annie Sunderberg and Ricki Stern’s film The Trials of Daryl Hunt this just might be the case. The film sets place in 1984 North Carolina, where Daryl Hunt was convicted of raping and murdering 25 year old Deborah Sykes. That is to say that Hunt was convicted of these allegations, not that he had committed these crimes. …show more content…
Hunt’s friend Sammy Mitchell was constantly at odds with the police, and although Hunt had no previous criminal record he was considered a prime suspect. Had a phone call not come to 911 operators the day of the crime, claiming to be a witness by the name of Sammy Mitchell, Hunt no doubt wouldn’t have been a suspect at all. The caller had the power to alter the attention of the police towards Sammy Mitchell, and along with him, Daryl Hunt. Actual caller and witness Johnny Gray had identified two suspects. One of which was Daryl Hunt, and a man who was supposedly locked up. Police were determined to calm the masses by convicting Daryl Hunt of the murder and rape of Debora Sykes. Nevrmind having rookie defense attorneys, but against all logic and evidence, Hunt was sentenced to life in prison. Hunt would be wrongly placed in prison for almost 20 years. No matter how many times the defense attorneys had tried, it was not possible to give Hunt his freedom. The only exception being that the true criminal was
Introduction The book that I selected is called “Getting Life” by Michael Morton, who is a man that was wrongfully convicted of killing his wife in Texas in 1986. This book takes us from a happy young couple to the day of the murder, through the investigation into his wife’s murder, Michael’s trial and conviction, 25 years in prison, appeals, release from prison, and reintegration into society. One unique fact about this case is that is the first case where the prosecutor in a wrongful conviction case was subsequently convicted of prosecutorial misconduct, stripped of their law license and sentenced to serve time in jail.
Howard County’s led officers into Prince George’s County, in part, due to information obtained from a search warrant. A global position system affixed to one of the defendant’s vehicles, and information gleaned from tracking one of the defendant’s cell phones led Howard County officers to the warehouse. Notably, the specific details involving Howard County’s investigation of Snowden and Caldwell were suppressed, but the State was permitted to elicit testimony indicating that Howard County officers were in Prince George’s County for an investigation. That evening, Detective Puglise was disguised as an electrician in a bucket truck. Detective Puglise testified that he observed Caldwell driving the blue Toyota Camry drive into a parking lot and position itself near a white box truck for approximately three minutes and then drive away.
• In 1957 the police of Ohio received an anonymous notification that the suspect of a bombing was hiding in Dollree Mapp’s house. • The police of Ohio went to Mapps house and demanded to search the house; she denied them the access to her property and demanded a search warrant. • After the police first try to gain access to the house, they went a second time and forced their entry to the property. • Mapp requested the search warrant to which the police only showed her a piece of paper, one that she could not had access.
I am 21 and for as long as I can remember I have heard many stories about innocent people being accused of and being punished for crimes they did not commit. On Monday, March 20th of this year, I met Anthony Ray Hinton and learned about his story. Arrested on suspicion of two capital murders at age 29. He was convicted and sentenced to death despite having a reliable alibi and passing a polygraph test. It was only after repeated efforts by the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) team that the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned his conviction based on his attorney’s deficient representation and he was eventually exonerated after 30 years in solitary confinement on Friday, April 3rd, 2015.
Brent Staples’s essay is still relevant today because of the fear that lives inside people who don’t understand or accept others, which often leads to authorities abusing their power so that they can feel safe while others live their lives cautiously. This relates to how both African Americans and the police live their lives in fear and with caution. The police fear African Americans due to their own prejudice reasons which causes them to abuse their authority by acting more aggressive which helps themselves feel safer and stronger. This forces African Americans to live their lives with caution and patience because if they don’t, they put themselves at a higher risk of endangering themselves. Brent Staples wrote the article “Black Men in Public
Elmore’s lack of objection or emotion convinced the people around him that he must be guilty. This was not your typical open and close murder case. This was a case of wrongful conviction and a miscarriage of justice that lost a man years of his life. The United States is distinguished for having one of the most sophisticated judicial systems in the world.
Society and government require people to be obedient towards authority, but is it always the best thing to do? During the aftermath of World War II many of the major leaders of the Nazi regime were put on trial for crimes against humanity (History.com). These trials were known as the Nuremburg war trials, were most of the convicted proclaimed that they were “just following orders” (McLeod 584). Being an accomplice to a crime is also against the law. In the Nuremburg trials, those accused were not breaking the law that their government had created, they were actually following it.
This is the downfall of leaders in many works of literature, including Harrison Bergeron and The Lord of the Flies. If given power, individuals obsessed with achieving their ideals will revert to an aggressive and uncompromising leadership style unless there is some form of a rival to keep them in check. Harrison Bergeron’s titular character experienced oppression first-hand and sought to exert complete power over a society that tried to make him powerless. Determined for change, Harrison stormed a TV station, the “ballerinas, technicians, musicians, and announcers [inside] cowered on their knees before him, expecting to die” (Vonnegut 4). A fear of individual recognition kept his society running, yet in his desire to remove this fear Harrison establishes his own and becomes a veritable enemy to peace.
Introduction This case study review is of the 1997 rape and murder of 16-year-old Sarah Hansen, perpetrated by a man named Robert Keith Woodall. The areas of this case that are identified in this review are: description of the crimes that took place, how the evidence led law enforcement officials to identify the Mr. Woodall as the killer, the rulings handed down by three separate levels of the US Court system, and how those courts came to the conclusion that the death penalty was the appropriate sentence for the crimes committed by Mr. Woodall. Lastly, this review identifies the impact that the decisions made by the US supreme Court had on the American justice system.
State of Florida v. Brenton Leonard Butler is a case where the State of Florida accused Brenton Leonard Butler, a 15-year-old high school freshman, of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens by a gunshot to the head through the bridge of her head. Since Brenton fit the description of the suspect according to Officer Martin and his partner, they approached Mr. Butler and asked questions regarding the shooting. The officers later asked victim’s husband, James Stephens, if Brenton was the man that shot his wife and being he was the only eyewitness, the officers arrested Mr. Butler. It is easier to wrongfully accuse as an African American male of a crime and that was the accusations put against Mr. Butler.
Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.
Imagine how a court would be run if it was dysfunctional. With many pieces of evidence to solve one problem that can lead to months after months, just to say those words, “guilty or not guilty.” There was one case that caught everybody's attention and became very famous. In 1994, O.J Simpson was accused for brutally murdering his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. He was sentence to court, and it took about 10 months to come to a conclusion as he walked out of court as a freedman.
Having power is a big responsibility and people in society need to find the right balance of control or risk losing everything they have, even the ones they
Power can have the persuasive action in undoing the moral ethics of one’s character. This can be seen throughout history, such as World War II and proven by the actions of Napoleon in the allegory, Animal Farm, by George Orwell. As Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In history what was viewed as a villain, is never the same as the perception. A leader does not begin wanting to do wrong, they start with the best intentions, but power is a tricky thing.
Random sample surveys were conducted in Seattle, Washington by telephone, which asked citizen’s various questions concerning their feelings towards police. These questions included their level of happiness in regards to police problem-solving, their views on police hassling citizens, and if they had ever experienced, or perceived to experience racial profiling or bias by law enforcement (Wu, 2014). Of all the citizens that took part in the survey, 64% of African Americans felt that racial profiling was a problem inside their neighborhoods, 28% of Asians, 20% of whites, and 34% of Hispanics agreed (Wu,