Change can be scary, but in most cases it is for the better, especially when it comes to technology. Two men by the names of David Crystal and Steven Pinker wrote and published articles magazines and newspapers. In Everyone’s An Author by Andrea Lunsford, Crystal and Pinker each wrote an essay incorporated within the textbook. David Crystal, an author and a professor at Bangor University in Wales, speaks about myths of the texting world. Steven Pinker, a psychology professor at Harvard University, has published many works for the New Republic and the New York Times. In his essay he wrote about misconceptions of new mass media. Both authors share similar ideas when reflecting upon the changes in technology. Throughout evolutions in technology, …show more content…
Strangely, many believe that such advancements are showing negative effects on people. However, David Crystal demonstrates in his article that texting is not as destructive as many believe it is. Beliefs exist that texting is a terrible new source of technology and as a result, language is being sickened. This is incorrect because, “Texting has added a new dimension to language use, but its long-term impact is negligible. It is not a disaster”(David Crystal 747). Texting by no means is as negative as some argue; it is merely an extension of writing. This technology not only extends writing, but also communication. Steven Pinker discusses how media and technology are portrayed as only a negative impact while the technological advancements show to help with brain function and intelligence. Today, “discoveries [in science] are multiplying like fruit flies, and progress is dizzying”(Steven Pinker 894). While many think that technology is disastrous, advancements in science have proven that it is essential . Both communication outlets such as texting and also scientific advancements are significantly are just two examples of how new technologies can aid in people’s everyday lives. These advancements display the agreement between both men that technology is helping to make life better for people by improving brains in ways that have never been viewed …show more content…
The brain is always evolving and adapting to change just like technology is in today’s world. New technology is created everyday and continues to demonstrate knowledge improvement. The new creations are thought as scary, but when viewed in David Crystal’s essay he reflects that people often think technology will damage language and sentence structure due to abbreviations. According to a study at Coventry University, “The more abbreviations in their messages, the higher they scored on tests of reading and vocabulary”(David Crystal 752). Many abbreviations used have been around since the time writing began. One must be aware of writing technique to abbreviate and make sense at the same time in texting as well as writing. Most ideas of texting are just false accusations in response to a new form of technology. In Pinker’s words he expresses that, “The decades of television, transistor radios and rock videos were also decades in which I.Q. scores rose continuously”(893). Just because something is new does not automatically entail it to be negative. These new technologies proved themselves to be beneficial in knowledge stimulation. Improved I.Q. scores means people are growing in intelligence due to new technology. Abbreviations used are just illustrations of people’s use of the English language. Distrust of
The author’s bias is emphasized in the article, in that “technology is largely to blame for big words’ fade out.” The author feels that the scholarly words’ decreased usage is a direct result from technology, and is not good for the society as a whole because she loves these words. The whole paragraph, “Technology is largely to blame for...our language is becoming abbreviated”, is a restatement of a common point: technology is degrading society from a vocabulary standpoint. Also, the author mentions Ramsey Bahrawy, an elder-law attorney. Bernstein states that Bahrawy “stays away from “vicissitudes” and instead refers to “the changes that occur in your life” when talking to people with lower educations.
Today, texting has become the most widely used communication technique for teenagers and young adults. It is written in completely informal language and it has no literature value in it. Although the critics believe texting is destroying literature value, McWhorter has another opinion in mind. McWhorter thinks that texting is another form of language that is developed by teenagers. It is the creation of a brand new language evolving from the old literature.
The magazine article “MSN Spoken Here” written by Charles Foran allures the attention of adults ranging from the ages of 40 and higher, particularly the ones who find text messaging an inconvenient way of communication in their everyday lives. This article appears to be about the transformation of the English language through electronic devices, visible in the 2004 lifestyle. However, based on Foran 's strand of language and, consequently, the binary word "Net Lingo" from paragraph five, it really is about raising awareness of the negative quality of messages that have become a barrier for the young demographic to properly communicate and connect with the older generation. Notably, due to the phrases and words of the English language that are
In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
The influence of textspeak on teenagers' writing is a polarising concept with both fans and critics of texting weighing their opinions. In her essay, "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington, a previous student of Marywood University in Pennsylvania, outlines her investigation into whether or not texting affects writing. Cullington analyzes the critiques of texting and why critics believe that texting has a detrimental affect on teenager writing. Along with the critics,
In the present global world, we are living in the era of advanced technology like computes, smart phones, TV and so on; and I love that. As early day goes by technology is changed. Technology makes things happen so faster. In the article, “Meet your iBrain,” the authors Gary Small and Gigi Vorgan talk about the current explosion of digital technology and how is changing the way we lives, how we communicate, and it is also rapidly and profoundly altering our brains. “Our brain is evolving right now at a speed like never before” Gary and Gigi.
All of these factors combine and work well together to form a well-executed argument within Cullington’s essay. Cullington begins her essay by addressing her opposition: “It’s taking over our lives” (pg. 361). She cites studies done that suggest that a decline in the quality of students’ formal writing has occurred since the advent of text messaging, and she also cites teachers who believe that their own students’ works are influenced for the worse by the students’ being accustomed to texting and using textspeak. Cullington then proposes her opposing position that the writing of students is unaffected by their use of texting and text speak. She also cites studies that support her thesis that text messaging and textspeak do not have an effect on
Not So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.
Too much screen use induces less communication between people and more time spent using technology. Technology used in our society in the same way. Sometimes people use television to forget about a hard time at work, others using phones in public, so they don’t have to interact with other people. “Little by little, technology has become an integral part of the way that people communicate with one another and has increasingly taken the place of face-to-face communication. Due to the rapid expansion of technology, many individuals fear that people may be too immersed in this digital world and not present enough in the real world,”.
Nicholas Carr, What the Internet is doing to Our Brains The Shallows (2010) asserts that, “The price we pay to assume technology’s power is alienation.” He supports this assertion by saying, “They both ultimately achieve their mental and behavioral effects by shaping the synaptic organization of the brain.” Also by, “ We long to keep it activated.” The writer concludes in order for people to improve their thoughts, they will have to cope with the new technology and how they think. Carr believes that technology is taking over how people interact with each other.
However, does texting really affect the literacy of teens and children? MXit is a trending mobile instant messaging service, that has over 10 million registered users, most users happen to be under the age of 18, who send on average 250 million messages every day.1 Even though teens and children are writing more than ever, most people don’t consider
actually affects our brains and the way we use them. Many people would argue that technology has more cons than pros, however it’s quite the opposite. We use technology in our everyday lives and it helps us to gain more knowledge than we’ve ever been able to before. The technology we have today is one of the greatest advantages we could have. Andrea Lunsford, who wrote “Our Semi-Literate Youth?
Text messaging allows people to send messages to anyone in the world quick and simple, but it 's only temporary. In other words, sending a text can be effortlessly erased. Postman believes that new technology such as text messaging is a blessing and a burden, meaning that there are many advantages as well as disadvantages. Furthermore, he also believes that every new technology will replace the old. In other words, new technology such as messaging on cellular devices has replaced writing letters to people as a way to communicate.
Everyone has a phone in their hands and are constantly texting in a specific manner. These people including myself are using slang such as LOL for laugh out loud or BRB for be right back. Texting language utilizes acronyms and abbreviations at their advantage to speed up conversations in obtaining ideas or information. Thus, the quicker the conversations, the simpler they can be resulting in a lack of understanding knowledge or information gained. Recent findings have suggested that schoolchildren in the 1960s and 1970s are more literate than children of today as they didn’t have the same access to technology and spelling correction tools like children today do.
One side of the argument is research and statistics show that students’ texting does not affect a student’s writing skills. In fact, it actually helps students in their development and structure of sentences within formal writing. On the other hand, some educators say otherwise, texting does have an adverse effect on students’